http://www.shrani.si/t/2l/k4/2ezWdYhB/11.jpg
I hate this stupid 3DM11 :mad:
I7 930@4000MHz 7470 points, GPU 1005/2290
I7 930@4650MHz 7600 points, GPU 1006/2335
Only 130 points difference :shakes:
Printable View
http://www.shrani.si/t/2l/k4/2ezWdYhB/11.jpg
I hate this stupid 3DM11 :mad:
I7 930@4000MHz 7470 points, GPU 1005/2290
I7 930@4650MHz 7600 points, GPU 1006/2335
Only 130 points difference :shakes:
I haven't run the benchmark yet myself so I can't say for sure, but it probably responds more to increased gpu clocks rather than increased cpu clocks.Quote:
Originally Posted by cole2109
Thats a good score, looks like 3dm11 likes X58/Bloomfield.Quote:
Originally Posted by cole2109
Yes i know 3DM11 is more GPU friendly, but 650MHz more on CPU and just 100+ points :down:Quote:
Originally Posted by MTP04
I tried 05 to and got low score. I think that 580 or latest drivers are not working properly on 05.Quote:
Cant figure out why I score higher with a 470 in 3dm05 vs this 580. Was able to hit 49,400's with a GTX470 at 890ish mhz, same cpu clocked at 5400mhz.
This is what I get with the 580. Maybe I need a fresh install.
My 580 doesnt like 05/03/01/AM3 either, its not too bad in 11. It only really shines in Vantage and 06.
:)
Very nice!Quote:
Originally Posted by Dumo
Please check your PM. Think I screwed up:yepp:
Dumo, is that 2600K chilled-water-cooled? High voltage with HT, no decreasing visible?
It cooled with single stage. For vantage I use 1.62Vcore bios LLC2 HT on and 1.575Vcore bios LLC2 for other 3D marks.Quote:
Originally Posted by Asmola
So far so good, of course high Vcore used only for a few rounds of benching and never run it with air or water
Damn, i need to buy single stage for my self too! LN2 is worthless with SB and it also cost's way too much..
Had a bad scare for a couple hours. I flashed the card and bricked it, during the process I erased the eeprom to try and get it to flash using ..nvflash -Protectoff...nvflash -Eraseeprom, because it wouldnt allow me to override the protectoin. Then it wouldnt allow me to reflash the card, tried everything, booted back to a black screen. Nothing seemed to work. Finally got it running again, guess I can cancell the RMA lol. Finally tried this... nvflash --index=2(adapter number) biosname.rom
I was getting real nervous for about an hour.
Thanks Dumo for helping. :up:
No problem:up:
I put a note for that just in case it happened to me:D
To remove protected bios use nvflash -r
Playing with '01 now...Trying to pass 130K sli run:)
My Crysis OC results are odd
with 1.088v @ 900Mhz core min FPS is a bit lower at 19fps while I get a higher and avg fps and with stock speeds I get a higher min with 24ps while avg and max is at bit lower.. also the tests really have HUGE variances in the min fps per batch run may it be stock or overclocked, warheard on the other hand is pretty consistent with min fps and gives me a boost of about 3-4fps minimum and 3-4max from 797Mhz (stock) to 900Mhz
Seems like my Q6600 @ 3.4Ghz finally met a GPU that bottlenecks it!
is your 580 on water?Quote:
Originally Posted by Dumo
My card does the same so i believe not.:cool:Quote:
Originally Posted by p3gaz_001
mine i think does not... actually i'm with stock cooler..and i can't push more than 935mhz 1.1v..... :mad:Quote:
Originally Posted by Asmola
not as bad as you may think :) its pretty good :up: bump up the voltage for higher clocks.. good luck!Quote:
Originally Posted by p3gaz_001
-----
guys please read the 1st post.. the 1.025V in the thread title is the vid not the voltage 950 runs @
Quote:
Originally Posted by NapalmV5
nice to hear that :rolleyes: btw, i've got 1.000 vid as default, and 1.150 max, wich voltage you suggest me to hold on daily / oc use? ;)
depends on the temps/fan setting/your preference.. you can run it @ 1.1v nonstop no problemQuote:
Originally Posted by p3gaz_001
title changed thanx Gautam!
do you think that if a get under liquid cooling my 580 i can push more event with less voltage?Quote:
Originally Posted by NapalmV5
http://www.xtremeshack.com/immagine/...3dm-record.jpg
this was a run of 3dm06 made just yesterday , as i said b4, 580 stock cooling... let me share a pic if you guys don't mind ... :bravo:
------------------------------
http://www.xtremeshack.com/immagine/...690-resize.jpg
and a koolance ready to go ..
http://www.xtremeshack.com/immagine/...484-resize.jpg
I have a stability question,
With several loops on crysis using the ambush and GPU maps, maxing everything out I dont have any crashes / artifacts, same with the warhead benchmark and 3DM demo looped several times.
I do get a hardlock with Dragon Age 2, but im NOT sure if its caused by the GPU OC ( 1.088v , 900Mhz Core ) Dragon Age 2 stays at about 50-60% GPU usage.. The music in the background or sound continues but the system hard locks.. its NOT that often though and very very hard to reproduce!
Comparing the GTX480 PCB and GTX580 reveals differences and similarities. One thing I noticed immediately on the 580 was the lack of filter caps after the chokes, despite there being spaces for them. On the 480, the caps are present. You will also see on the Direct CUII there are filter caps post choke. Anyone with some tantalums lying around want to fill in the blanks on the 580 and see if it makes any difference in clocks?
Pics (first 2 pics from Hardware Canucks review, 3rd pic from techpowerup review):
http://i720.photobucket.com/albums/w...580GTX-480.jpg
http://i720.photobucket.com/albums/w...GTX-580top.jpg
http://i720.photobucket.com/albums/w...echpowerup.jpg
Since GDDR5 has some sort of ECC, whats the best way to test for stability on this ?
Diminishing returns vs clockspeed increase probably. Plot a graph and see when it starts to become non-linear.
Since these cards mem chokes seem borderline under-specced when OC'ing and like to fail, how far is even safe to push the mem 24/7?