Conroe 2.4Ghz on 965G mobo, brief test...

Yeah 3Dmark05 must be much more GPU dependent. That is the only thing that can explain why I can beat Absolute's scores above so handily when we have the same CPU and his is clocked 115Mhz higher...


Actually my highest 3dmark05 score was 12,600 :D


guess the X1900XTX pwns... :slapass:

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by VictorWang

1G*2 still cannot run, only 256m*2 running.

xfx 78gtx 512m on stock.
580_1730, LOD=0
3Dmark05=10517
CPUmark=8621

---

I hope its the fact that your running only 512. Or hopfully that its buggy as heck. I scored a 11170 in 3dmark05, but with 2 gb of memory. See my Signature.

http://service.futuremark.com/compare?3dm05=1884411

Here is mine to compare with, stock 7900GTX(which shouldnt really very from the 7800GTX 512. (650mhz core, 1600mhz Memory) I think this thing kicked ass in the SuperPI test, but isnt doing so well in 3Dmark.

~Mike

its def gpu dependant
01 is where its at..

looks like 9500 - 9900 is the score for a X2 4800+ with a GTX 512 and 2gb of ram... 800 more points is pretty damn good for a gpu benchmark.

http://service.futuremark.com/compare?3dm05=1761119

Guys, guys, guys... the GPU dependency means that any increase in score due to the CPU represents a very large CPU power!

About the 512mb thing, 512mb versus 256mb makes 0 difference in 3dmark

And the score being higher because it's buggy? Buggy can only make scores lower, not higher.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by arisythila

I hope its the fact that your running only 512. Or hopfully that its buggy as heck. I scored a 11170 in 3dmark05, but with 2 gb of memory. See my Signature.

http://service.futuremark.com/compare?3dm05=1884411

Here is mine to compare with, stock 7900GTX(which shouldnt really very from the 7800GTX 512. (650mhz core, 1600mhz Memory) I think this thing kicked ass in the SuperPI test, but isnt doing so well in 3Dmark.

~Mike

---

622_1880 3Dmark05= 11225 :p: only 256m*2 4-4-4-12

if 79gtx @ 650_1800 with 1G*2 ram , at least 12000 :D

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by VictorWang

xfx 78gtx 512m on stock.
580_1730, LOD=0
3Dmark05=10517
CPUmark=8621

---

Wow that is a good CPU score. I just ran 3dmark05 again right now on my machine (no tweaking just spur of the moment) and got:

http://img82.imageshack.us/img82/4008/ma059hq.jpg

So Conroe is defintiely pwning AMD dual core current gen!

i'm confused i asked one of my contacts at a mobo company and he told me that the only mobos that will support conroe officially i guess are:


965 and 946 series chipset

any one can explain this to me?? also he told me that by august they will have the mobos ready

Nice Victor, keep it coming!

well, hes using 965 for these tests, and 975 is supposed to work from everything i've heard, but so far no current boards are working with Conroe that we've seen.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by VictorWang

622_1880 3Dmark05= 11225 :p: only 256m*2 4-4-4-12

if 79gtx @ 650_1800 with 1G*2 ram , at least 12000 :D

---

:eek: :eek: :eek:
Getting better and better... Again, let me emphasize, this is the kinda performance you'll be getting from a ~$300 CPU at STOCK speeds...:woot:
Loving it.

Mike

PS

Great job Victor :toast:

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by VictorWang

622_1880 3Dmark05= 11225 :p: only 256m*2 4-4-4-12

if 79gtx @ 650_1800 with 1G*2 ram , at least 12000 :D

---

Keep up the good work :D

any info on the cpu temp??? idle ??? full load ???

Some very nice scores VW, thank you for sharing it with us. At stock this CPU is really killing almost everything. Hope to see a 975X board + this chip go for Rampage.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by VictorWang

622_1880 3Dmark05= 11225 :p: only 256m*2 4-4-4-12

if 79gtx @ 650_1800 with 1G*2 ram , at least 12000 :D

---

Looking here http://www.xbitlabs.com/articles/vid...900xtx_37.html, I figured the performance ratio (for 3Dmark05 only!!!) of ATI 1900XTX to nVidia 7800GTX 512Mb cards is about 1.11, sooooooo if you had a 1900XTX you'd be getting ~12460 3Dmark05 score... :eek: :banana: :eek:
I forsee AMD hardware getting very cheap in the coming months...;)

Mike

cant wait to see this thing overclocking, a core based on low power principles when given lots of high power must be crazy.

and no cold bug either


Conroe will probably be the chip that I switch to phase change for...


Thanks for all the great results Victor, any info on temps??

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by ceevee

and no cold bug either


Conroe will probably be the chip that I switch to phase change for...


Thanks for all the great results Victor, any info on temps??

---

just a heatsink with 2 heatpipes inside.

no fans at all :p: :p:

the HS just a little bit warm, maybe 25c (ambient=22c)


some results updated, welcome to my blog:
http://vic.expreview.com/index.php

So overall it's probably pretty cool running? Wonder if you could get any temp probes in there, no temp support from the motherboard?

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Absolute_0

So overall it's probably pretty cool running? Wonder if you could get any temp probes in there, no temp support from the motherboard?

---

ya, cool like yonah (maybe a little bit cooler......since lower vcore)
no temp monitor function in the mobo :(

Are you running passive cooling on that CPU? That's insane!

damn it VW i want to see this thing running past 3GHz.....common dude show us the goods :)

yes..... only oced@3 GHz :-)

cause yonah just hit the 17sec 1m
and an impressive 16 min 32 m

:clap: :clap: :clap: :clap: :clap: :clap:

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by VictorWang

just a heatsink with 2 heatpipes inside.

no fans at all :p: :p:

the HS just a little bit warm, maybe 25c (ambient=22c)


some results updated, welcome to my blog:
http://vic.expreview.com/index.php

---

Geez, what are we gonna do w/all those 120.3 rads! :eek:

Strat