I have a Fry's close by too...
What is the level variance for max FSB on these boards? Is is it really that bad?
Do you know what the current price @ Fry's is? $130 on newegg.
Printable View
From what I've seen the FSB's are all about the same, its the amount of volts required to acheive them that differs. If you can hit say 450 on auto, then chances are you can hit 500 @ the max of 1.71V. Runawayprisoner has had more than one and refers to some requiring more volts than others @ certain speeds. I too want 450-475FSB with low volts for 24/7 operation and don't care what volts it takes 495+ as long as it will. If you need the full 1.71v just to get 475 stable then 500 won't be likely. Once I find one that can hit 450 on auto and +500 @1.71v then I'm gonna keep it and change the northbridge cooling. They're $154 here in Texas. I've only tried one thus far, the next one will be tried this weekend.
What do you suggest for NB? I was thinking of simply adding a cheap 40mm fan...
I'd be fine with basically any board that gets 475 on air... The problem is that I'm not sure about my RAM...
It's running at 916MHz 6-6-6-18... I can't test higher so that could always be a limit... Plus it's heatspreaderless so I'm worried giving it more than 1.9v.
My P5K-DLX kicked the can earlier today running same settings its been running 24/7 for nearly 2 weeks.
Hope it didnt take my X3350 with it :(
All I have for a backup board is an Asrock 775Dual-VSTA. X3350 wont post on it :(
That's my Q9450, mounted on Gigabyte EX38-DQ6, cooled by Scythe Zipang.
Vcore setup in bios 1,3125.
V Fsb +0,20 volts.
V Nb +0,20 volts.
V Dram +0.20 volts.
Memory 4x1Gb Crucial BallistiX Tracer with Led latency 4.4.4.12 @ 900 Mhz (1/1 Dram/Fsb)
Look's it have a FSB wall around 460 mhz, I will try more, with more voltage on Vfsb and VNb later
Enjoy it.
A question, CoreTemp V 098.B1 shows 1,0875 VID, and Coretemp 099 shows 1,20 VID, wich is real?
Anyone tried the new P45 chipset with their chips yet? Any improvement?
There are quite a few people on the thread about the new ASUS P5Q Deluxe board. Go here: http://www.xtremesystems.org/forums/...d.php?t=189437
There is a broad range of CPUs being used on it, quads and duos alike.
My P45 (ASUS P5Q Deluxe) is arriving Tuesday. I got this Q9450 last week - I'll be setting everything up & OC'ing by the end of next week.
Okay My first P5E-VM HDMI(pencil vdrooped) may be a keeper unless I find one that breaks 500FSB with 45nm Quad.
System
Q9450 L810B906
Swiftec H20 220
Asus P5E-VM HDMI(pencil vdroop Mod)
VisionTek 3870 OC Edition
2GB Kit Crucial PC8500
OCZ GameXtream 700W
Code:Jumper Free Configuration
Ai Overclocking (Manual)
CPU Ratio Setting (8)
FSB Strap to North Bridge (333MHz)
FSB Frequency (450)
PCIE Frequency (100)
DRAM Frequency (DDR2-900MHz)
DRAM Timing Control (Manual)
DRAM CAS# Latency (4)
DRAM RAS# to CAS# Delay (4)
DRAM RAS# Precharge (4)
DRAM RAS# Activate to Precha (12)
DRAM Write Recovery Time (Auto)
DRAM TRFC (Auto)
DRAM TWTR (Auto)
DRAM TRRD (Auto)
DRAM TRTP (Auto)
Clock Over-Charging Mode (Auto)
CPU Spread Spectrum (Disabled)
PCIE Spread Spectrum (Disabled)
CPU Voltage (1.3125v)
CPU Voltage Reference (Auto)
Cpu Voltage Damper (AutO)
PLL Voltage (Auto)
DRAM Voltage (2.26v)
FSB Termination Voltage (Auto)
North Bridge Voltage (Auto)
North Bridge Voltage Reference (Auto)
South Bridge Voltage (Auto)
http://img.techpowerup.org/080608/Q9...VM HDMI641.jpg
The second reading is correct, so 1.200V.
You can also use realtemp to check the VID of your cpu.
Nemesis, is it safe to leave the motherboard voltage settings on auto?
I was under the impression that the boards can over compensate, over-volting some components unnecassarily?
I haven't had any bad expirences with auto. It typically would set voltages too low and I would have to manually set them higher to get stable. Only the VTT & North Bridge voltages need increasing on this board as you go up in FSB. The PLL seems to overvolt regardless of what you set. 1.52v showed 1.6v+ in windows.
I have two Xeons X3350 with the same WK/batch. One of them has the vid of 1.2V and the second one 1.2375. The second one clocks a bit better and is also a bit cooler. vid itself doesn't matter in terms of the CPU's overclockability. If it did, then QX9770 would be the worst clocker as it has the highest vid in most cases (1.275V in my case). So just OC and you'll see what your babe is able to do.
Question that might not be related much, but look at my 5v:
http://img180.imageshack.us/img180/8821/occtxx9.jpg
System is running stable like a rock. I wonder if the reading is wrong. Would even a system run alright with such low 5v rail?
qetto , Mayor (king) Daley can corrupted your PSU
hey guys, just booted my q9450 @ 3.8 :up:
heres what im using
Asus P5E-VM HDMI, 2x 1GB Crucial Ballistix DDR2 800, q9450
this is what concerns me, the 4th core temp sensor doesnt
work.. i havent reseat the CPU yet, since i just installed
everything, so ill try that tomorrow but it concerns me much :shakes:
has anyone ever have this issue? and can it be fixed
i know this doesnt belong here but seems like when i change
some things in the bios it doesnt directly apply.. like my ram
speed and timing are manually set but seem to be automatically
set when booted..
thanks in advanced :up:
Can you get it stable? I can boot my xeon 3350 at 3.7 just fine with extreme voltage on the NB. I can`t get it to prime for more then a few minutes before freezing though. Stable easily on a P35 board of my mate though. (And more then 3.7 actually) Booting doesn`t say much when it crashes all the time. :p:
just got a q9450 but i think my temps are stuck on core's 3 and 4 should i return this cpu? and idle or load temps on core 3 and 4 always have the same temp its kinda bugging me if i have a diffective proc, any suggestion or info? and what safe temps should i have for a 24/7 setup idle and load?
core temp 0.99
--idle--
core #0 52c
core #1 49c
core #2 65c
core #3 65c
--load--
core #0 66c
core #1 62c
core #2 71c
core #3 71c
Real Temp 2.5
--idle--
core #0 42c
core #1 39c
core #2 54c
core #3 54c
--load--
core #0 57c
core #1 53c
core #2 62c
core #3 62c