That seems too low for 3x mtron 7500's. I have 2 and I get 240. I expect on #3 to have 360 no problem. They seem to scale up perfectly until you hit the limit of your controller.Quote:
Originally Posted by Atlantic2142
Printable View
That seems too low for 3x mtron 7500's. I have 2 and I get 240. I expect on #3 to have 360 no problem. They seem to scale up perfectly until you hit the limit of your controller.Quote:
Originally Posted by Atlantic2142
4 x Patriot Warp v2's on ARC-1220
http://i18.photobucket.com/albums/b1...ca128katto.jpg
2x 150GB VelociRaptor's RAID 0 - OS/App. Drive
http://i211.photobucket.com/albums/b...Tune200109.jpg
Intel Matrix - Maximus Extreme
supertalent 32gb sata mini pcie ssd @ asus eee pc900
http://img207.imageshack.us/img207/3392/900jj9.png
Boot & App Volume:
Mirror of Fujitsu MBA3147RC 15K SAS Drives
http://www.pcrpg.org/pics/misc/fujitsu15kmirror.png
Data Volume:
8x500GB WD & Samsung 7200RPM SATA in RAID-5 on Areca ARC-1220
(HDTune doesn't show the real capacity of 3160GB usable due to an issue with supporting 64-bit LBA in the program--as such, the true access time isn't shown either which is around 15ms)
http://www.pcrpg.org/pics/misc/newarray.png
3XWD 40GB in RAID 0 -128K stripes. With amd SB750 controller.
http://i2.photobucket.com/albums/y9/...boy/hdtack.jpg
http://i2.photobucket.com/albums/y9/esi-slowboy/1-8.png
Raid 0 results are all based on two drives.
OCZ core is single drive (performance was so bad I wasn't going to buy another one to see raid results).
All results are on OS based drives untweaked, apart from the OCZ drive, which was tweaked to improve performance.
http://img16.imageshack.us/img16/6540/pcmark053.png
http://img244.imageshack.us/img244/3527/random.pnghttp://img19.imageshack.us/img19/4117/read.png
NOTE: please dont take these numbers seriously dont want to make anyone cry :)
ahahah :D
What's up with your numbers? PCIe x8 doesn't even have remotely that much bandwidth.
VR 150 raid 0 on ICH10R
http://i32.photobucket.com/albums/d1...ancedCache.png
@ NapalmV5
Config?
Their system is PhotoShop ;)
Areca ARC 1231 use pcie 8x. Pcie 1x = 500 MB/s , 500x8 = 4 GB/seg max.
Bench show >10 GB/s :ROTF:
You have not seen as jumping the line at the end, ? , muahah http://img291.imageshack.us/img291/5159/vengaya.gif
@ FEAR
lol come on you know my config :)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mr.Bean
Quote:
Originally Posted by Particle
FYI: its 12GB/s max !!!Quote:
Originally Posted by Mr.Bean
:ROTF: photoshop? right! im gonna spend all my time punching in all those numbers/dots/graphs :rofl:
if you guys want more info check the storage subforum :rolleyes:
F1 500gb
http://img7.imageshack.us/img7/391/hdtunesamsungot8.jpg
Hitachi 640gb
http://img152.imageshack.us/img152/4...hitachihj0.jpg
Hitachi 750gb (8mb)
http://img10.imageshack.us/img10/788/hdtunehitachi.jpg
Yes, but not what Ram do you use.Quote:
Originally Posted by NapalmV5
DDR2, DDR3? OC or not? ;)
No, it's really not. PCIe 1.x is 250MB/s per lane. Seeing as how all the Areca cards are PCIe 1.x x8, that means you're limited to ~2GB/s by the slot itself. 9GB/s average is simply impossible on that hardware and means one of the following:Quote:
Originally Posted by NapalmV5
- Benchmarks are screwing up (quite possible)
- You've got Windows setup to do insane caching, thus skewing true hardware performance greatly
- RTC slowdown
@ Particle
Napalm means 12GB/s. with MFT ;)
http://www.xtremesystems.org/forums/...d.php?t=218669
Ok then. Let's just not try and pass this off as hard drive performance when it is RAM being used as a generous cache.
FYI: its not ram! it has nothing to do with pcie = xxxxMB/s :rolleyes: its done on the ssd!
those of you not enjoying the numbers hope you got a good rub-in/not taking the numbers for fun you really got dire issues
heres the NOTE: please dont take these numbers seriously dont want to make anyone cry :)
late purposely :D
@ FEAR - all the info is @ thread: giga ep45 extreme/ddr2/q9650 @ 4.5ghz
The data has to get to the SSD somehow, and if you're going through a controller then it very well does have to do with PCIe bandwidth.
Ram-Timings and Ram-Clock?Quote:
Originally Posted by NapalmV5
^ 600mhz @ default 5-5-5-15
why so interested ? :D
you wanna pin point why your 1261 cant catch my 1231 ? :D :D :D lol
just let me get 4x faster ssd..
Just setup a raid 6 array on a 3ware 9690Sa-8I with BBU and 8xSeagate 7200.12 500gb
Here are some benchies:
http://img3.imageshack.us/img3/6877/raidc.jpg
why?Quote:
Originally Posted by NapalmV5
MFT profits from the performance of desktop-ram
So, you can use slower SSDs than your´s. :D
I think on a Core i7-system you have the best performance (better cpu-ram linking)