Victor, can you run Super Pi 2m?
Regards..
Printable View
Victor, can you run Super Pi 2m?
Regards..
yeah! what are temps like?Quote:
Originally Posted by StyM
I gotta ditch this Gskill ram 200*11 at 3-4-4-8 921 on winrar bench OUCH !!!!
oooooohhhhyeah~~~~~~~!!!
78gtx 512m no running with my lovely E6600.
3Dmark05 benching ...
exciting !!!
Good to hear :) Keep us informed. :toast:Quote:
Originally Posted by VictorWang
Just curious what did you do to get the 7800GTX to work if you don't mind me asking?
Oh my god i cant wait :DQuote:
Originally Posted by VictorWang
Keep up the awesome work Victor!
well, whats the deal?Quote:
Originally Posted by VictorWang
Very exciting news indeed. Waiting impatiently for the 7800 512mb results.
and put some 3dmark06 on in...stat!
vic, you get the 2x1g stix to work yet?
On Victor's page, did you guys notice how dual SPI only does a run at 25seconds? That's 4 seconds lower than in single.
Can anyone on a DC AMD do a single and then a dual SPI run and see what the difference in times is? (make sure you seperate both instances to run on one core only by setting affinity)
naturally, it will be this way because of the shared cache. oh well.. 4mb is still a ton and 25s at stock is farking crazy nonetheless :)Quote:
Originally Posted by The Coolest
Quote:
Originally Posted by VulgarHandle
1G*2 still cannot run, only 256m*2 running.
xfx 78gtx 512m on stock.
580_1730, LOD=0
3Dmark05=10517
CPUmark=8621
put some 3dmark06 on it!Quote:
Originally Posted by VictorWang
Is 10,000 3Dmark05 really very good?? :confused:
I get over 12,000 3dmark05 with the rig in my sig no problem
3dmark05 is a graphics card benchmark =[ You have a x1900xt
X1900 Runs 3DMark05 better than 7800GTX, your rig is at 2.9GHz, this is at 2.4, his ram is only at DDR533 and 4-4-4 timings, yours is higher and tighter than that, plus you have 1GB he is working with 512.Quote:
Originally Posted by ceevee
All in all, very good initial results, he can't tweak anything at the moment, except the video card maybe.
Damn Conroe is killing it @ the momenet getting 10K plus with stock parts and with a 2* 256 ram.with buggy bios.Now that's somethin good job Victor:clap:
Agreed. Its too hard to read much of anything into the '05 score because of some problems that still have to be sorted through. Very unlikley the CPU is getting in the way of the rest of the system, no doubt its the other way round.Quote:
Originally Posted by RyderOCZ
3D benches that allow the members to project OC'ed results, will make for a dramatic finish to this initial testing thread. :D
Let's see some real benchies, like 3dmark01 :D
and an ATI cardQuote:
Originally Posted by wwwww
05 CPUmark=8621 is almost good enough for 1st page of orb (edit:@ stock)
The X2@3001 MHz/1gb/x1800 on the first page hits CPU Score: 8662
LOL :drool
If this is restricted by driver/bios issues... wow.
The geeks of earth need some sleep...we need some sub zero temp runs on a good board... on second thought that might make things worse.
the 3dmark05 score is phenomenal. I don't know much about 3dmark tweaking... but my 7900GT clocked higher than his 7800GTX (mine is clocked at 600/1860) with my 170 @ 3.15 Ghz benched exactly 10,500 on 3dmark05. Victor actually beats my system here even though my GPU is clocked higher and my 170 is 58% overclocked.
So from what i've seen 2.4 Ghz Conroe is faster than my 170 @ 3.15 Ghz
WOWZA
He has the 512mb version
Again, it is a gpu test. Cpu would be 2001SE
To compare (kinda) an AMD 4000+ (2.4GHz 1MB L2 cache) with 7800 GTX gets 3Dmark05 video score of 9395 (corrected) http://www.xbitlabs.com/articles/vid...900xtx_37.html (:eek: )...Quote:
Originally Posted by VictorWang
Sure, 4000+ is a single core, but from what I've seen 3dmark05 doesn't gain much from dual cores.
Not too bad if you ask me. :toast:
Mike
PS
Current AMD 4000+ price = ~$330 >>> same price Conroe 2.4 is to be released at.... (AMD-roids, keep your panties on, this is just a simple comparasent of prices that will most likely change, on two different classes or CPUs, but then again, single core, double core, it's all the same to 3dmark05)