Look at the crossfire scaling for 3870 in crysis I saw these pics on this german forum there half way down the page
http://www.forumdeluxx.de/forum/show...422403&page=42
Printable View
Look at the crossfire scaling for 3870 in crysis I saw these pics on this german forum there half way down the page
http://www.forumdeluxx.de/forum/show...422403&page=42
That's almost unbelievable! Why an earth anybody has ever tell us about this!?Quote:
Originally Posted by malik22
Tried to google and found nothing about it. It looks like Ati's AFR (announced in cat 7.10) rendering is working. Am I right that AFR doesn't need game to support multi GPU to perform in crossfire? I think this could be an example.
Quote:
Originally Posted by vengance_01
i made few tests ( in my signature)
Quote:
Originally Posted by malik22
nice find !! great results !!
Quote:
ATI Cysis Hotfix
WIN XP PRO SP2 DX9 HIGH - 1280x1024
2xHD3870 @ 825/1226MHz
E4400@ 3,2GHz
ABIT IX38 QuadGT
-----------------------------single card = 46,2 FPS-----------------------Crossfire = 69,2 FPS ---- >>> +50%
http://img236.imageshack.us/img236/2878/crysiswf8.jpghttp://img236.imageshack.us/img236/3614/crysi2nb5.jpg
-----------------------------single card = 24,8 FPS-----------------------Crossfire = 38,2 FPS ---- >>> +54%
http://img124.imageshack.us/img124/726/crysis1dq9.jpghttp://img113.imageshack.us/img113/7329/crysis2ag1.jpg
-----------------------------single card = 42,7 FPS-----------------------Crossfire = 52,6 FPS ---- >>> +33%
http://img114.imageshack.us/img114/2020/crysis3cx7.jpghttp://img114.imageshack.us/img114/8746/crysis4gv1.jpg
-----------------------------single card = 34,3 FPS-----------------------Crossfire = 95,7 FPS ---- >>> +179%
http://img253.imageshack.us/img253/6466/crysis5zz1.jpghttp://img253.imageshack.us/img253/6320/crysis6ni5.jpg
>> http://www.forumdeluxx.de/forum/show...postcount=1255
maybe next week i receive 2x Powercolor HD3870 PCS edition , i will test them also !!
:up:
:eek2: 3870 CF just keeps looking better and better :D
Nice wrok, mascaras!
He posted another picture, +73%. http://www.forumdeluxx.de/forum/show...postcount=1277 :up:
Quote:
Originally Posted by L7R
I know every review I saw says crossfire doesnt work in crysis compared to nvidias sli that only scales 20-30percent in this game this is pretty impressive on a hotfix driver and the sad thing is they said crysis was built on the 8800 series.
Wow, that's a decent performance boost from CF....time I got me an x38 board me thinks!
(which is best :P)
lol these cf test are fake
look what tech power up forum guy say
http://forums.techpowerup.com/showthread.php?t=45823
he says that cf doesnt work in crysis
Some of you folks don't have a clue what you're talking about and still make comments about what is fake and what is not. That's a P965 motherboard. Of course they will have problems with performance in crossfire.Quote:
Originally Posted by cefurkan
Bit-tech review also doesn't show any improvements in fps with cf in crysis (with X38 motherboard), and with hot fix installed any everything.
http://www.bit-tech.net/hardware/200...eon_hd_3870/11
Could it be Vista?Quote:
Originally Posted by Krizby87
For ati:
32bit XP = Good
32bit XP & Crossfire = Very good
Vista & DX9 = bad
Vista & DX10 = very bad
Vista 64bit & DX10 = very, very bad
I've tested CF in Crysis both for XP x64 and Vista x32!
XP x64 and final Cat 7.11 - CF a bit slower than single card, but no image corruption
Vista x32 and HotFix driver - CF much faster, but image corrupted BIG TIME!
I'm waiting for a Crysis Patch + new Drivers :)
Watchout, the Vista guys will get you;)Quote:
Originally Posted by L7R
They don't know I'm only vulnerable to garlic ...and sunlight. :devil:Quote:
Originally Posted by Donnie27
Hehehehe!Quote:
Originally Posted by L7R
any more tests with Vista DX10? :D
Since Crysis is a NVIDIA "The Way It's Meant To Be Played" game, ATi doesn't get the source code they need to develop CF drivers until after the game is released... :shakes:Quote:
Originally Posted by Krizby87
At least ATi releases drivers as quickly as possible, unlike NVIDIA...
As a consumer, does it really matter that whether this game is TWIMTBP so Nvidia has an edge in this game ? or which products offers the best performance/price on a wide ranges of games ? for a fan boy though TWIMTBP matters cause Nvidia is cheating because their developer relation team is doing their jobs.Quote:
Originally Posted by Zytek_Fan
...which is a farce though. Not seldomly i " :ROTF: :clap: " when most if not all problems in tech support threads of certain games that are "TWIMTBP", was from frustrated players with nVidia cards none from ATI's.
Typical ATI problem was the bad (or lack of) OpenGL support, supposedly fixed since Cat 7.1 (?) or so.
That reminds me: gonna check today if that's true!
EDIT: yes it is!
I recall reading that in the bit-tech reviewQuote:
Originally Posted by Zytek_Fan
Actually, ive read somewhere, that ATI themselves have stated that they have been working with crytek since early production, so i wouldnt go that far.Quote:
Originally Posted by Eastcoasthandle
Read the article here linkQuote:
Originally Posted by GAR
AMD has been buddy-buddy with Crytek for quite a long time, before FarCry days. While ATi wasn't sending anywhere close to the time and money Nvidia was giving to Crytek, they definitely did help A LOT with the engine and technologies needed to create it. I have seen two or three .pdfs in the past year - year and a half with both Crytek and ATi on them.Quote:
Originally Posted by Eastcoasthandle