Vista 64 long test
Raid 0 stripe 32k one partition
Abit Ip35 Pro ICHR9
2 x 160Gb WD1600AAJS
Printable View
Vista 64 long test
Raid 0 stripe 32k one partition
Abit Ip35 Pro ICHR9
2 x 160Gb WD1600AAJS
2x Compustocx 128GB MLC SSD (Raid 0, stripe size 128K) on ICH9R (DFI X38):
Write-back cache disabled (left) vs. enabled (right):
http://database.he-computer.de/Bilde.../SSDohneWB.jpghttp://database.he-computer.de/Bilde...h/SSDmitWB.jpg
http://database.he-computer.de/Bilde...ch/hdtuneR.jpg
Give them a real controller and use 4+ and your system will fly... very similar to OCZ core series (Samsung-based with crappy Jmicron) but I didn't experience any unusual lags yet :up:
Intel x-25m:
Perhaps a bit late... but here are my results.
Cheers
Areca 1680ix-12 and 10 Seagate 15k.5 SAS drives
:D
WOW Nizzen! :shocked:
That is the highest average read speed I have ever seen on striped mechanical or SSD drives! The only exception being a RAMdisk.
That is awesome. Good job.
I wonder if there any other raid cards besides the Areca 1680 that would allow that high of read or write speeds.
Tough act to follow, but...
my 4 ssds in RAID 0
http://www3.mediafire.com/imgbnc.php...7e58404e6g.jpg
3 x VelociRaptors in a Matrix 300GB slice
Does this look right? I thought SSD's were less volatile that this...[IMG]http://www3.mediafire.com/imgbnc.php...26c34d236g.jpg[/IMG]
they are if you don't have anything installed on them (i.e. OS / Programs) for benching or accessing them (i.e. AV software running), under these circumstances so are traditional hard disks except instead of a slightly wavy line you get a curve going from highest read to lowest on the far side instead.
WD 640GB (16MB) in RAID 5 on a RR 3510 controller
http://www.freeimagehosting.net/uploads/e801ce3092.png
Who has more IOPS or 4k-results? :p:
Left = read - right = write
http://www.abload.de/img/hc_471n1hx.jpg http://www.abload.de/img/hc_473w4i0.jpg
http://www.abload.de/img/hc_474xyon.jpg http://www.abload.de/img/hc_453f4qq.jpg
^ :D
http://img58.imageshack.us/img58/5453/readvf7.pnghttp://img67.imageshack.us/img67/2035/writedw5.png
they need to fix their write tests
after 64k the controller stays throttled @ max for 5+ minutes
Heres my main drive, WD 250GB Caviar SE 8MB (WD2500AAJS) (Slow boy) Q9550@3.6ghz Its way past due for a reformat, going on this format for about 2 years now... lol
http://i270.photobucket.com/albums/j...00AAJS-55R.png
Oh and heres my storage drive forgot about that one, little faster than my main, its a WD 1TB 16MB Cache (WD10EACS) same cpu/speed etc... Its got a fresh format as well.
http://i270.photobucket.com/albums/j...EACS-00D6B.png
@ Napalm
Which drives - Supertalent with Areca-Cache? (512k or 2GB?)
At write i see the typical write-deficiency of MLC. :(
Can you run read and write without cache, too? Please! ;)
@ F E A R
response here:
http://www.xtremesystems.org/Forums/...7&postcount=91
http://img243.imageshack.us/img243/130/512bgp6.png
http://img513.imageshack.us/img513/2899/80039142fy7.png
http://img513.imageshack.us/img513/1397/64kzx4.png
http://img243.imageshack.us/img243/6327/1mbtm4.png
http://img513.imageshack.us/img513/7008/randomzb6.png
My two drives for comparison.
WD Caviar 160GB IDE :shakes:
http://i288.photobucket.com/albums/l...b151/wd160.jpg
and my WD 74GB Raptor :)]
http://i288.photobucket.com/albums/l...wd74raptor.jpg
I have another 74GB Raptor, and me-thinks I will be trying some Raid setups soon...