At that point it's looking for something to boot from. Do you have a flash drive, non bootable CD or diskette inserted?Quote:
Originally Posted by lancer
At that point it's looking for something to boot from. Do you have a flash drive, non bootable CD or diskette inserted?Quote:
Originally Posted by lancer
Disable legacy USB support.
You see some numbers changing on the lower right of the screen, then after "00" the screen turn black with only a blanking cursor on top left?Quote:
Originally Posted by lancer
If yes, try to set the ICH7R to RAID mode.
I see you are using SATA optical drives, the problem is most likely involving them. Check that the SATA mode you have selected is correct for the optical drives (Native would be my first guess). Also check that the firmware on the drives is up to date.Quote:
Originally Posted by lancer
After being unsuccessful loadind Vista Business 64 bit, I reinstalled the 32 bit version. Now my audio is distorted. I have installed the audio drivers and reinstalled both from the CD and Web site. Anyone have this problem? In Win XP it's fine so I know it's not the audio chip.
Has anyone found a utility that will allow you to up the fan speed in vista of the fans attached to the xbx2 headers? I used IDCC in XP to manually increase the header fan speeds for me but IDCC doesn't work in vista! My cpu runs a good 8-10C hotter in vista than it does in XP according to TAT and the ability to up my header fan speeds will shave off a good 2-3C for me like it does in XP. Any info would be really appreciated.
Vista has the audio drivers included. Loading the Intel ones causes the conflict.Quote:
Originally Posted by tom8881
Uninstall the drivers then make sure there are no traces of the following files left in Windows and it's subdirectories...
stacapi.dll
staco.dll
staco64.dll
stlang.dll
sfng32.sys
sfng64.sys
sthda.sys
sthda64.sys
Scan for new hardware.
Alfredo just updated Speedfan to control the chip on our boards. Still in beta so you may have to register to get it.. 4.32 beta 17Quote:
Originally Posted by astrodave
http://www.almico.com/sfbetaprogram.php
3.6? Whosajiggawhat?Quote:
Originally Posted by Speederlander
How did you do that?
Have you tried it with the BX2?
I have the BX2 with a QX6700 and I am cooking along at 3.33 (10x333)- I can go upto 348x10= 3.48.
I am using the Tuniq Tower, OCZ PC2-5400 at 1.92 Volts. CPU Stock Voltage. C1E, EIST and Watchdog is OFF.
Keep us posted, please.
I just tried the speedfan beta and it doesnt do anything to my fan speed. I changed it to 100% but they never increased like they do in idcc. I dont think it works right yet.
I need more volts to get windows up and stable, 3.6GHz prime stable is about 1.44v idle/1.4v load, maybe a tad more (but it's just too hot to let it run long term that way on air). I already posted at 4.1 GHz when I first put the chip in the Asus board because I had never reset the BIOS on it and had no intention of taking out the 6600 that was in it and overclocked. Volts then were at like 1.6 and fsb at 401, though temps were 70*C idle haha. BUT, I think this chip would fly under phase. With my tuniq I would keep it at 3.2 GHZ since I can do 3.2 GHz prime stable at 1.3v idle/1.26v load.Quote:
Originally Posted by smoothmove
The intel board is certainly dead though. Tried it with a 6600 and got the red led and no post. :(
BIOS Version 2634
About This BIOS:
February 16, 2007
BX97520J.86A.2634.2007.0216.1057
SATA RAID info:
Intel(R) RAID for SATA - v5.6.2.1002
Marvell 88SE6145 SATA BIOS – v1.1.0.34
PXE UNDI: Initializing Intel(R) Boot Agent GE v1.2.28
PXE Base Code: Intel(R) Boot Agent GE v1.2.42
Intel® Active Management Technology info:
Intel® AMT BX Firmware: v1.2.3
New Fixes/Features:
Added support for ACPI Serial Port Console Redirection (SPCR)
table for AMT SOL.
Added support for Windows Vista* Media Center OCUR Host Firmware
Support.
Added fix for ITK where Parallel Port is always hidden.
Added fix for Windows Vista* where EBIOSPost.exe had error while
returning EBU status.
I just got my D975XBX2, and i do have some problems with the Multiplier-lowering to 6...
I have disabled C1E in configuration-Mode, i have not overclocked the CPU, i disabled VT and EIST and still the CPU lowers the multiplier when in idle mode.
How can i force the Board to disable ALL powersaving stuff?
Its pretty annoying because it can cause framerate drops when gaming.
RMclock works. just set it up so that it loads at start up and it'll disable EIST.Quote:
Originally Posted by cryptocat
The BIOS is broken. Changing C1E has no effect.Quote:
Originally Posted by cryptocat
Get RMClock: http://cpu.rightmark.org/products/rmclock.shtml
Quote:
Originally Posted by gtj
Are you SERIOUS?!
Intel does not allow me to disable C1E? What the...
And actually i do have RMClock, but i dont wanna use a software for what one SHOULD be able to disable in the BIOS.
I might just return this board to the store... Fan-control doesnt work either...
Is this the case with all xbx2 bios atm?Quote:
Originally Posted by shimmishim
I'm working with Intel now to solve the C1E issue.Quote:
Originally Posted by cryptocat
What do you mean "Fan-control doesnt work either"?
Yep. C1E has always been broken as far as I know.Quote:
Originally Posted by Speederlander
You're gonna need a fairly extensively modded phase change system to handle the heat load from a quad core. It's a strange thing, these QX6700s seem to like lower volts sometimes to achieve an overclock; that is, in a few instances I've seen unsuccessful POSTs at 3.4GHz and 1.5v, but lowered to 1.4v, it POSTs and is stable.Quote:
Originally Posted by Speederlander
Seems like it's only recently been recongnized then, yes? No mention of it through most of this thread as far as I can see.Quote:
Originally Posted by gtj
Getting a custom phase tuned for high load QX6700. ;)Quote:
Originally Posted by Omastar
I agree that they like low volts. I've had mine post FAR below baseline. But the fact that it popped up at over 4 GHz with 1.6vcore (1.56 actual in BIOS) gives me warm fuzzies about its overall abilities. With well tuned phase I should be well into the 4's (I hope) on GHz with volts well below the 1.6v mark.
Quote:
Originally Posted by lancer
+1 on related to SATA opticals. I have 3 sata opticals and disabling the boot from cd ability in bios fixed that issue.
That's because most people are using cpu-z and it wasn't reporting correctly until version 1.89 which just came out. It was reporting the max multiplier, not the current multipler.Quote:
Originally Posted by Speederlander
Well, there have been several tools that also did report correctly, such as RMClock.
You said your were working with Intel to solve that. (Which i do appreciate!)
Does that signify you are an employee at Intel?
Because i dont think they would change the (next) BIOS if you just told them :(
clockgen 1.0.5.3 working with the XBX2
pll SLG505YC56D
I too wish there was a way in the BIOS to set the fan speeds to 100%. IDCC is the only way I have found to do it but it won't work in vista. Fanspeed does nothing for me in vista. I set the speeds to 100% but the fans don't do anything. I would love a way to control the fanspeeds whether it be through the BIOS or in vista...
No I don't work for Intel. I just happen to have some spare time to pursue the issue.Quote:
Originally Posted by cryptocat
I'm not just "telling" them. I've also given them MSR dumps and other debugging info that demonstrates the bug.
IDCC should work on Vista-32 if you run the installer in xp compatability mode, then set compatability mode on the executable after it's installed.Quote:
Originally Posted by astrodave
Oh yeah, the latest speedfan beta will work but youhave to use the configure-advanced tab to set the fans to manually controlled.
Hm, that also doesnt work for me.
Ive Installed the IDCC on Windows 2003 (IA32) - crashes when i try to run it.
Ive read about the XP-compatability mode, doesnt work either.
Im kinda pissed off, everyone said the Intel-Boards were so super-great and now nothing works - no IDCC, cant disable C1E - the Fanspeed-Control is not able to set the RPM to 50% or less (which my old Asus P5AD2E could do) and the Sigmatel-Audio stutters in Ghost Recon Advanced Warfighter.
Intel TAT installs but when i try to run it it just wont do anything at all.
By the way, is it right to assume that the D975XBX2 is inofficially capable of FSB 1333?
Since it does have the 333 strap it should be, right?
Im getting DDR2-667 DIMMs next week, so id like to use the FSB 1333.
But stability is really important to me, does OCing the FSB also overclock the PCIe-link and the Southbridge?
Ive heard that is decoupled now, but im not sure since my P5AD2E (925XE) did have dividers, and if you set it to slightly below 266 it wouldnt recognize the hard drives anymore, because it used a new divider starting at 266MHz.
Nonetheless, i do hope you can achieve that they change the C1E-Bug in a new BIOS :)
CPU Temp Question:
Just fired up my new rig for the first time. I'm in the BIOS and just wanted to monitor the CPU temp for a bit before proceeding. I want to ensure I don't need to make any modifications to the 9700 Zalman cooler I have on it before I go any further.
BIOS CPU Temps after 10 minutes with CPU, memory, etc. ALL at default speeds. e6600 CPU:
Processor Temp: 38C
Internal Temp: 32C
Remote Temp: 31C
Is this acceptable, good, bad, normal, or ???
Thanks.
-scaryogre
looks normal, depending on ambient.Quote:
Originally Posted by scaryogre
Ambient is about 74F. This is also with the case cover OFF right now. Once the Arctic 5 grease starts to settle in I am guessing the temps may go down some as well.Quote:
Originally Posted by Speederlander
Once you're up and running, make sure you use a monitor that reads the actual core temperatures.Quote:
Originally Posted by scaryogre
Tried that and it doesn't work. It BSOD's my box if i do that. It won't even launch unless it's in xpsp2 compat mode but it then blue screens so...Quote:
Originally Posted by gtj
I also have been all over those tabs in speedfan and it sees the fans and says it is 100% but there is no speed increase in the fans and then speedfan just drops back to 20%-30% by itself.
Didn't know you were running WS2003. You're correct about IDCC and TAT but Speedfan 4.32 beta 17 works fine on WS2003. I'm playing with the speeds right now. I've got my 2000rpm fan down to 600rpm.Quote:
Originally Posted by cryptocat
1333 FSB easy. PCIe and SB not linked, no issues.
what do you suggest?Quote:
Originally Posted by gtj
ps: my board came yesterday :) so much for being backordered, huh? :)
Well, Everest ULTIMATE has the best all around support for the board butQuote:
Originally Posted by argylesocks
Intel's Thermal Analysis Tool (TAT), Coretemp, the latest Speedfan Beta, are also good. Try them all and pick the one you like.
Latest Everest (you need 2007 build 879 or greater) Just unzip...
http://www.lavalys.com/beta/everestu...x4fmanswgo.zip
TAT...
http://www.techpowerup.com/downloads/392a/tat.exe
Coretemp...
http://www.thecoolest.zerobrains.com/CoreTemp/
Speedfan (you need to register to get the beta)...
http://www.almico.com/sfbetaprogram.php
IDCC 2.2.0002 definitely works in Vista32
Run both the install and application as an administrator and in XPSP2 compat mode and it works fine... in fact better than XP for me ;)
http://support.intel.com/design/moth...c/download.htm
I was on a quest to get a custom screen on my G15 keyboard that had the info that I needed to see w/o the glitz.
I wanted: Voltages (VCore, 12, 5, and 3.3) Both core temps and the GPU temp. (threw in an analog clock for grins)
I used LCD Studio 2.0, Speedfan 4.32 build 17, and ATITool 0.26 and got what I wanted.
What all that unrelated stuff leads up to is that:
1) Speedfan comes close to TAT (within 1 degree) with temps on both cores.
2) ATI Tool gets the temps on the 8800s pretty well.
3) Without spending buku bucks I still have to load and run several tools to get the info I want on my G15 LCD :( but what the heck...
So ultimately how serious is the C1E issue for serious longterm overclocking? Seems rather concerning. Now that my Asus lost its cold boot issue with the lower FSB, I am not as quick to jump ship, though I still like the idea of the Intel for a few other reasons. However, the C1E issue is making me second guess (on replacing the one my tuniq backplate fried :rolleyes: ). If it is something that will obviously be cleared in a soon-to-be released BIOS, then it's no biggie. But if it's a nagging problem that doesn't get resolved...
edit: or is it EIST bug? meh...acronyms.
Does this waterblock fit the xbx2 NB? Says it fits "badaxe motherboards" in the write-up but the slots seem in the wrong place for xbx2...
http://www.petrastechshop.com/dadenmachwa9.html
I am getting low scores in AquaMark3..I have a Evga 8800GTX..I saw a fix somewhere and can't locate it.
Thanks
the manual states if you shut the fan control off in teh bios that it will run at 100%.Quote:
Originally Posted by astrodave
could someone explain what the following is & what the setttings 'should' be:
C1E
EIST
SpeedStep
i have a general idea, but im still a little confused on how they all are connected, or not.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Speederlander
Quote:
Originally Posted by argylesocks
C1E should be OFF - (not sure what it does)
EIST- OFF ( this is speedstep)
ALSO- WATCHDOG has to be off. It screws up overclocking (you get to the watchdog function but changing the bios jumper to get in. Change the watchdog and shut down after the save. Replace the jumper to normal positionn)
Hope this helps, Stan
It blue screened my machine....Quote:
Originally Posted by stmckin
That is probably just for cpu fan control. I have a big typhoon with manual twist knob for cpu fan speed. I need a way to control the other 3 fans in my machine, especially the fan positioned across from the video card so that they are running at 100%. At 100% they are still pretty silent but give me an additional 3C of cooling and with my machine now running 10C hotter in vista than in xp i really need those 3C back. IDCC blue screens my machine, fanspeed does not do anything for me so I'm stuck until Intel updates IDCC.Quote:
Originally Posted by argylesocks
Quote:
Originally Posted by smoothmove
so, C1E changes the multiplier... does the voltage stay the same?
what does EIST do?
edit: actually, is there a linky that has more info on the bios? it would be nice to see everything with an explanation of what it all does.
edit#2
after searching this thread, i then check the stick guide (duh, should have check this first)...Quote:
Originally Posted by faq
so what is changing the multipliers? the C1E or the EIST? does the voltage ever get dropped with the new bios 'bug'?? if so, is it causing stability problems? or does it work hand-in-hand & drop the multiplier down at the same time?
with it enabled, how quick is it to know when the cpu is under load? is there any lag while playing games, etc??
thanks :)
C1E = changes multiplier
EIST = changes voltage
:toast:
PS - C1E drops the multiplier to 6 even if you have it disabled. aka "the C1E bios bug"
thanks :)Quote:
Originally Posted by theonlybabyface
so that guide has it backwards, i guess ??
so is it either 6 OR 9 ?? ie: slow OR fast? no multi of 7 or 8? (for an e6600).Quote:
Originally Posted by theonlybabyface
when does it "know" that it can slow down, or need to speed up?
if im playing a game, and pause for a minute to go pee, will it drop down to 6? hopefully it will go right back up to 9?
so is there a 'bug' with EIST? do voltages drop?
when your cpu cycles are not being used, the mult drops down to 6x. so if you're just sitting in front of your computer browsing IE or firefox, your computer will be running 6 x FSBset.Quote:
Originally Posted by argylesocks
now if you turn on some program that stresses the cpu such as dvd encoding or running a distributing application like f@h then your cpu will go to 9 x FSBset.
it's a power saving function ( 6 x FSBset consumes less power than 9x FSBset).
As for the voltage dropping... I haven't seen the voltage change.
Actually, they BOTH have the capability to change the multiplier AND the voltage. The difference between the 2 is that EIST allows the OS to make the changes (either automatically from power profiles or under user control) while C1E is triggered automatically by the processor going into a halt state (I.E. no work).
So, EIST by itself does absolutely nothing. C1E is what's causing the multiplier to move around based on demand. BTW, I think C1E only messes with the voltage if the voltage is set at default in BIOS. At least that's what I'm observing.
Personally, I LIKE C1E once I'm stable. Why run the cpu full during idle periods? It's during tuning that it becomes a pain.
So...
No bug with EIST. It's probably never even being invoked.
Bug with BIOS correctly setting C1E on initialization.
You can manually control C1E from within Windows with RmClock, Everest and others.
If you're concerned about C1E, just play with it and see how your system reacts for the kind of load you put on it.
thanks for the clarification.Quote:
Originally Posted by gtj
so do you have EIST shut off in bios now? and just running C1E? or do you have both turned on?
im still a little confused on the two.. got some more reading up to do, i guess.
is there any relation of this to setting my computer in "hibernate" "sleep" or "quick resume state" ??
I have EIST off on all 3 machines. It's not doing anything anyway but I have it off just on case.Quote:
Originally Posted by argylesocks
C1E is enabled on my 2 production machines and disabled on my test machine. Obviously because if the bug, I have to also disable it from Rmclock to get it to really disable.
No relation between the power states (hibernate, sleep, etc) and the power saving features.
On my 2 stable machines, I have both EIST and C1E on. EIST isn't doing anything however.
On my test machine, I have both off.
thanks for the quick reply (and your patience)Quote:
Originally Posted by gtj
Thanks gtj for the links. I'm assuming by recommending that I monitor core temps you are referring to "Computer" and "Sensors" under Everest correct?
I do like this program. The registration pop-up every 2 minutes is unbelievably annoying though. Not yet sure if I want to drop $30 for the full version.Quote:
Originally Posted by gtj
Going to try this one tonight...Quote:
This one failed to work for me. :confused: Upon start it said something like "Failed to load driver". Then did not report on the core temps at all. Running Vista-32.Quote:
Anyhow, thanks again for the links and the advice.
-scaryogre
I had to unistall the drivers and install Microsoft's HD Driver to get my sound to work properly, but Intel audio Studio has no uninstall option. Now every time I start up Vista I get a error. Anyone know how to uninstall the Intel audio Studio?
You should see 3 CPU temps. One that's just "CPU" which is the diode on the substrate, and 2 "Core" temps which read the digital sensors on each of the cores. It's the "core" temps that are crucial.Quote:
Originally Posted by scaryogre
It'll be the best $30 you ever spent. They are great folks to deal with: extraordinarily responsive to bugs and feature requests.
Go to Control Panel / Windows Defender / Tools / Software Explorer / Startup Programs and delete it's entry. Next go to Program Files and delete or rename the directory.Quote:
Originally Posted by tom8881
OK, thanks for the info. I may end up purchasing it. It seems very comprehensive.Quote:
Originally Posted by gtj
The first feature request I will make if I end up buying it is to limit the pop-up reminder to at least every 30 minutes. :D
i am still running 2333
has anyone had any issues with the latest 2634 BIOS, thanks
it was posted here cant find it....it told you beep codes,all imfor for the badaxe2 from intel....help
I have a question regarding the sound. I currently have a home theatre 5.1 and I used it before to connect to a Creative card in my XP machine. I was just trying now to use the integrated audio in the BX2 with my home theatre, but I only get sound in 2 speakers. Any idea why?
Quote:
Originally Posted by horatiub
You only installed the drivers and did not setup the intel studio software. It has all of the "feature" needed to make it 5/1 7/1, etc...
hmm, do you have a link to what I was supposed to download? I remember installing a Sigmatel software, but it looks very basic.
bummer. so you we can used the Audio Studio in vista?Quote:
Originally Posted by tom8881
how come there are vista-specific audio drivers then?
Vista has everything needed to run the internal audio. No need for separate drivers or intel audio studio. In fact, if you do an upgrade of XP to Vista without removing the Intel Audio Studio and the Sigmatel drivers, the audio will get messed up.Quote:
Originally Posted by argylesocks
Not sure why Intel just release a package for Vista.
http://support.intel.com/design/moth...umentation.htmQuote:
Originally Posted by eagle101
The HDD LED staying on was fixed after 2333 but the watchdog was also introduced which doesn't work well.Quote:
Originally Posted by neonflx
I didn't have any external USB devices connected at the time this thing kept hanging on soft reset boot.
I've upgraded to the latest bios from 2333 and no longer have this issue for those interested.
It works fine, thats the block I am using on my XBX2 (ordered from PTS also :cool: )Quote:
Originally Posted by Speederlander
speaking of audio...
if my case only has AC97, am I going to have troubles using the front audio?
i believe there are drivers for this, but im scared to use them now, due possible conflicts with Vista32...
what are others doing?
I'm using Eist for Vcore and multi change with overclocking and it's working fine as long as you don't want to go higher than stock volts. You would have to use RM or Crystal for that.
To my knowledge C1E is disabled in bios. Well I can't be bothered to do a maintainance boot right now...
Idle: 2Ghz @ 1,1V
http://img140.imageshack.us/img140/9697/idleui2.th.jpg
Load: 3Ghz @ 1,325V
http://img140.imageshack.us/img140/1171/loadsk9.th.jpg
anyone know how long of an SLi bridge connector I need to connect to nvidia cards on this board and what brand sli bridge i'll need?
As far as I know, this board doesnt support SLI. Crossfire only.Quote:
Originally Posted by shimmishim
its called hacked sli with hacked drivers.Quote:
Originally Posted by chaotic646
it works.
just need to find the correct length sli bridge....
wonder if i can use the flexible asus one.
The flexible Asus one will work for slots 1 & 2 with a little slack. I'd be interested to know your results.Quote:
Originally Posted by shimmishim
thanks! that's what i was wanting to know. :)Quote:
Originally Posted by gtj
i'll get a flexible one then.
can somebody show me the link for the Vista drivers? Also, do I need to install anything else other Sygmatel audio control?Quote:
Originally Posted by horatiub
Here it is...Quote:
Originally Posted by horatiub
http://downloadfinder.intel.com/scri...ting%20Systems
but all it gives you is a little applet with a sigmatel logo that does nothing of consequence. Just more crap you don't need.
Im going nuts here. Does anyone have any kind of 6channel audio working through S/PDIF? I can do the Test for DTS and Dolby Digital in the Encoded Formats section and the surround sound test work fine. Can't the 9274D upconvert everything to 6channel? Also have no clue how to get Red Orchestra to use the card but I guess thats separate issue.
edit:
oh lol-
http://www.techwrighter.com/index.ph...d=62&Itemid=42
Sorry
Which OS? I can play Dolby Digital 5.1 DVDs and get the correct s/pdif data stream out to my digital speakers. I think you have to start with a 5.1 source.Quote:
Originally Posted by JamesAvery22
THANKS FOR THE HELP GTJ....Quote:
Originally Posted by gtj
you're right, I have that installed, but I still can't get my 5.1 sound to work. I can't figure out what I'm doing wrong hereQuote:
Originally Posted by gtj
Are you using the analog audio jacks or the digital outputs?Quote:
Originally Posted by horatiub
Is the source 5.1?
the analog. and yes, the source is 5.1Quote:
Originally Posted by gtj
OK, in Control Panel / Sound / Playback you should see 2 devices, 1 for the speakers and 1 for the spdif output. Select speakers and click configure. Are they set to 5.1?Quote:
Originally Posted by horatiub
I am aware of hacked drivers, but I havent read anywhere of anyone having success with hacked sli drivers on this board yet. Did I miss something?Quote:
Originally Posted by shimmishim
TAT reads 8-9 degrees high on the bx2 so keep that in mindQuote:
Originally Posted by gtj
Coretemp reads incorrect as well. The only "correct" reading software I'm aware of is either intel desktop control center or intel desktop utilities. I don't own everest or sandra software.
IDCC and IDU don't read the core temps. They only read the diode on the substrate.Quote:
Originally Posted by slagdemon
The reason the various core temp programs appear to disagree is because the digital thermal sensors embedded in the cores are very sensitive and have a very quick response time. If you read them even at half second intervals you can get very different results based on what's going on at the time. If you load the CPU to 100%, all the programs that read core temps will agree.
i haven't either. i'm gonna give it a try! :)Quote:
Originally Posted by chaotic646
my 2nd 7900gt should be here hopefully by the end of this week. else, i won't be able to try for another 1 plus week as i will be gone on business.
also, any word yet of unlocking the mult with a future bios revision? I'd really like to use my 8x mult to see what the max of this board is w/o having to use crystalcpuid (which i can't seem to get to work properly).
you're right, I'm such an idiot. That was the problem, I've never configured the sound before in Vista and I didn't bother to look there.Quote:
Originally Posted by gtj
Thanks again, I appreciate it.
for some reason on my new replacement board with the 2634 bios .. i cannot overclock at all .. i disabled watchdog and stuff but still .. just wont give me video after i exit bios or it just shuts down
i basically just set everything the way it was on the old board with the 2507 or wutever it was bios
Hey guys,
Just built the rig in my sig. I read this thread up to page 45 and concensus up till then was that BIOS 2333 was best for OC'ing. Is this still the case? I'm not having much luck on getting this CPU/board past about 340, I'm using the latest BIOS.
All your power cables connected again?Quote:
Originally Posted by jetjaguar
If you're changing the voltages,did you completely power down afterwards?
It's still the consensus. If you're using later BIOS's did you disable the Watchdog on the maintenance menu?Quote:
Originally Posted by J@mmer
What settings are you trying and what symptoms are you seeing?
No I have left the watchdog thingy on. Basically I get the OC failed message whenever I try even a mild OC. I'd prefer to keep the latest BIOS if I can.
Thanks GTJ! I'll give this a crack tonight when I get home.