He already has a 5Ghz screenshot up, so its definately possible. (withdrawn - my mistake)Quote:
Originally Posted by badatgames18
:)
Printable View
He already has a 5Ghz screenshot up, so its definately possible. (withdrawn - my mistake)Quote:
Originally Posted by badatgames18
:)
Don't think George has a CPU yet :p Hard to post a screenshot then....
""Today, 12:51 AM
eva2000
Administrator
eva2000's PC Specs
Join Date: Jul 22 2004
Location: Brisbane, Australia
Posts: 22,699
twitter.com/i4memorycom Facebook Page livestream.com/i4memorycom
Blog Entries: 41
Yeah if I am lucky earliest I can see my 3930K shipping would be by Tuesday/Wednesday ... fingers crossed ""
Unless it's already thursday in down Under...
My mistake mate, comment withdrawn (it was a 2600K screenshot)
A local guy is having nice luck with 2600K's, he found two that do 56x on air and now says he has one that boots into windows at 60x at 1.544v ..... I havent seen a screenshot yet but I have no reason to doubt him.
:up:
I just got L131b325 What this means, what can be expected?
just came back from the store again today :)
same supplier lmao
batch:3104C269
http://img835.imageshack.us/img835/869/anotheroneb.png
not as good as the one i just sold, but hey.. past 3 chips have been 58 or up :D
That is another keeper, good deal.:D
same batch as mine:up:Quote:
Originally Posted by badatgames18
you have the golden pimp hand, mini andre yang:D
You have a golden hand for sure ! :)Quote:
Originally Posted by badatgames18
Hey, its hard to get Costa Rica chips here at the moment, does anyone know which USA stores (particularly around badatgames area) will ship a cpu overseas?
:)
Guys, I just upgraded from a P8P67-Evo to a Maximus 4 extreme-Z and its giving me crap, I have lost 200mhz and so many more fine tuning adjustments available too, are they necessary?
:(
2600K, 5016Mhz Turbo on all cores with HT on with 1.37v Prime stable 8 threads
http://img408.imageshack.us/img408/8296/sb5ghz137.jpg
sup aussie how come ? can you explain more the issue ?Quote:
Originally Posted by aussie-revhead
PM coming ....
:(
He will loose ability to set VCCIO and VCCSA separately as they are now tied together on ROG Z68 and will loose 1 of the SKEW settings (cannot remember which one though)!
Great work and seems pretty hot to :eek: dont kill it and what are max multi ?Quote:
Originally Posted by 2good4you
That's VID no vCore...Quote:
Originally Posted by 2good4you
shoot me a pm, the bios can be a bit different, but as humeyboy said vccio and vccsa are tied together, try 1.05-1.1 and see what works best for your chip.Quote:
Originally Posted by aussie-revhead
VCCIO is supposed to be 0.5v lower than your DRAM voltage (think I posted it in this thread a page or 2 back or another thread)!
DRAM @ 1.6v would have VCCIO @ 1.10v.
You will see Asus turns the fonts yellow to warn 1 notch above DRAM @ 1.65v and therefore VCCIO @ 1.15v!
I picked up a Costa Rica with batch number 3114C461, but it seems to be a crap. It takes 1.38v for 4.5ghz and it fails at 4.6ghz even with 1.45v.
My L139B137 will do 4.5GHz at around 1.36v anything above won't clock at all no matter what voltage, going to try a different motherboard see if I can do any better.Quote:
Originally Posted by Andi64
My other two 2500K's
2500K: Batch No: 3138A838
4.9GHz = 1.408 load (prime95), 1.408v load (IBT 2.56) 1.424v idle. (Manual CPU Voltage = 1.43v BIOS)
4.9GHz = 1.400v load (prime95), 1.42v load (IBT 2.56), 1.01v to 1.06v idle. (Auto CPU Voltage)
4.8GHz = 1.336v load (prime95), 1.344v load (IBT 2.56) 1.352v idle. (Manual CPU Voltage = 1.36v BIOS)
4.7GHz = 1.296v load (prime95), 1.296v load (IBT 2.56) 1.312v idle. (Manual CPU Voltage = 1.32v BIOS)
4.6GHz = 1.384v load (prime95), 1.408v load (IBT 2.56) 1.01v to 1.06v idle. (Auto CPU Voltage)
4.6GHz = 1.280v load (prime95), 1.280v load (IBT 2.56) 1.296v idle. (Manual CPU Voltage = 1.30v BIOS)
2500K: Batch No: L104A429
4.6GHz = 1.336v load (prime95), 1.36v load (IBT 2.56), 1.00v to 1.05v idle. (Auto or Manual CPU Voltage) (Maximum Clock stable)
4.5GHz = 1.328v load (prime95, 1.352v load (IBT 2.56), 1.00v to 1.04v idle. (Auto or Manual CPU Voltage)
Should i be happy with my 2500k , Got it to prime stable @ 1.284 v under load. Bios voltage is set to 1.3
Should i be happy with my 2500k , Got it to prime stable @ 4.5GHz 1.284 v under load. Bios voltage is set to 1.3
Has anyone tried a 3129C016 batch 2600K yet?
:)
Id try any Costa Rica C chip :D
yup that's where all my golden ones have come from:)Quote:
Originally Posted by Viss
It won't die. 58 is max i think. It has high potential but a hot chip, even on low vcore, as I see 1.37 quite low. :yepp:Quote:
Originally Posted by PytonOrm
Yeah? Maybe you now what a multimeter are.Quote:
Originally Posted by st0ned
If that's 5ghz at 1.37v vcore,why are your temps hitting 90+c,????
Try IBT at that voltage and see it fail as it is NOT stable!
is there such a thing as a multiplier limit bug?
whenever I try x49 it won't work, no matter the voltages. haven't tried x50
specs in sig.
UPDATE: running x50 at 1.35V Prime95 stable for 30 minutes now. Maybe x49 is evil.
1st of all watch the language because I don't know you from anywhere... 2nd your CPU is morelikly thermal throttling. And as to my knowladge about what a multimeter is I'm a studdent of electrical engineering :), but I can't see any you your image.Quote:
Originally Posted by 2good4you
Bad coolingQuote:
Originally Posted by moorhen2
So you have to know me because I correct your speculations? I find my quote perfect to you. now you speculate that the cpu is throttling. Sorry but it don't. 98c is where it starts throttle. Also prime is getting the chip hotter. Not practical apps as heavy you wish.Quote:
Originally Posted by st0ned
Me and I think other XS users don't like to be lied to, and non of us is stupid, at least I know I'm not. Prime isn't more stressfull then IBT/Linx ( at least if you have the right linpack ) else your pic doesn't show anything about vCores, I'm not saying your chip doesn't do what you say it does, only that the onli proof you showed is flawed. I myself have a chip that does the same, but I have real printscreens showing correct data :)Quote:
Originally Posted by 2good4you
PS. TJmax isn't the temperature where it starts throtteling, but I let you read about TJmax at intel datasheet.
Uh?Quote:
Originally Posted by 2good4you
First of all, you need to post a proper screenshot. That's NOT the voltage at all, and the fact that that CPU is *THAT* hot tells me that you're at anywhere between 1.45 to 1.5v. And you have NO BUSINESS insulting stoned, because he clearly knows far more than you will ever know about this hardware.
#1:
That's the VID. The VID is the voltage identification signal that the CPU requests from the motherboard. The VID is calibrated individually and varies even from identical CPU samples. The VID is only the vcore if the voltage in the BIOS is set at Auto, and even that doesn't tell you the CURRENT voltage, since the requested voltage, *IF* set for auto, doesn't compensate for what is known as vdroop. If you set a BIOS voltage manually, then the voltage the board gives the CPU is completely independent and irrelevent to the default VID.
#2: Try posting a CPU-Z screenshot from the most recent CPU-Z version, and if that's not accessible for you, use hwinfo32. THEN show us your vcore. Then I suggest you post an apology, AND update your sig. And please don't ever use coretemp to show voltages anymore....
The ONLY reason we even care about "VID" is that it's been known that chips with a lower default VID (usually measured at stock speeds) tend to run at 5 ghz with lower voltages on average, BUT also run hotter, while chips with a higher default VID often require higher voltages for 5 ghz, but run cooler (meaning: the higher vid cpu will run cooler at the same mhz/voltage, than the lower vid chip). Not ALWAYS, but uusally.
I really like my 2500K, I set the vcore to 1.2v and every day I raise the clock by 100. I'm now at 4.2 and IBT is still running fine, I hope I will do 4.5 at this voltage :)
As for my temp, my core 0 is always 6° colder than my 3 others core, is that normal or should I reapply my thermal compound ?
Well got my 3930K on Friday just waiting on EK LT Supreme 2011 mount which should come this week :)Quote:
Originally Posted by Leeghoofd
In mean time messing around with new Asus Maximus IV Gene-Z with 2x new 2600K L047A898 but so far no much luck with getting high multi cpus.
1st 2600K L038A660 still best one so far 5Ghz 1.38v 32M pi, 5.2Ghz 1.512v 32m pi on Corsair H50-1 and handles 2x2GB Corsair Dominator GT 2000C7 at 2133Mhz 7-7-7-24 1T fine on Gigabyte P67A-UD7 1st rev board.
These L047A898 are so far hitting 51x multi wall for around 5154mhz at 1.496v on Corsair H50-1 with Maximus IV Gene-Z but still figuring out bios settings! But Prime95 custom small ffts at 4500mhz 1.312v so far.
lucky bugger, if you got a spare one to sell to a memory enthusiast in Australia let me know :DQuote:
Originally Posted by badatgames18
I asked him first ..... veloCD back here has had four that do 58x or more .....
:)
Where is the screen? :DQuote:
Originally Posted by aussie-revhead
fight fight! :DQuote:
Originally Posted by aussie-revhead
What's the lowest the BLK can be set to so I can see how much Multi my 2600k has before I swap over for the 2700k sitting here?
I somehow doubt it would boot much above 5GHZ with 100BLK!
Well, the problem is, it isn't exactly a multiplier wall at all. It's a frequency wall. For example, there are two walls...one with PLL overvoltage disabled and another with PLL overvoltage enabled. When you enable OV, you tend to gain around 400-500 mhz of possible mhz. Here's an example: You can replace this example with one more suitable for your current CPU:
If you find that you can load windows and run games at 4.9 ghz, 100x49, with PLL overvoltage disabled, but if you do X50, your board says overclocking failed, or boot loops and falls back to last settings (unless you switch PLL OV enabled), then what it means is that your CPU can't do 5 ghz with OV disabled, NOT that it can't do a x50 multiplier. You can test this by raising the BCLK and lowering the multiplier to x49, x48 or x47, to see if you can reach 5 ghz that way. What you will find is that your CPU will simply OC fail or boot loop around 4930 to 4960 mhz. You can quickly validate that by lowering the multiplier again and trying a slightly higher BCLK and see that it was not BCLK causing it, nor multiplier, and when you see that raising the vcore doesn't help in the least, you will have your answer.
Changing the BCLK/multiplier can let you squeeze in a little more mhz, but if you're too close to the wall, you may find strange things happening, like being unable to complete 3D, etc, even with enough vcore...
lol we are both probably in a que....Quote:
Originally Posted by eva2000
:)
Update from earlier :
x52 at 1.41V on water (almost 80c)
I cant make out my batch number since the sticker was right on the edge of the box where you split it open, however I can make out a D lots of 000 and a 3, might take off the heatsink when the 2nd 570 comes in to check what it is but my chip certainly wants volts for 4800 :( It's not stable unless I pump a whole 1.465 into it...Any ideas? this seems to be way too much for what the general trend is. I'm on a p8p67 Pro. I dont like running 1.465 through it for obvious reasons, the heat goes into the high 70s low 80s at that voltage and my room is uncomfortably cold. I'm running a Havlik 140mm which is a dual fan 6x heat pipe job which is supposed to cool better then most.
SOLVED
It appears that CPU PLL was causing all the problems with having the need to run high vCore. Since I disabled CPU PLL overvoltage, and lowered the voltage from default 1.8000 to 1.6000 I am able to run lower Vcore Prime stable
I'm not sure what specifically fixed the issue, turning off PLL overvoltage or going from 1.8 to 1.6
I am now able to run at 46x at 1.328 under load in prime, this is a huge improvement, I had to run 1.370 with CPU PLL overvoltage and at the default 1.8 CPU PLL to maintain prime stable 46x before.
I also lowered the load line calibration as it was overcompensating a tad too much. It's at utlra high, anything lower gives a bsod since the volts dip way to low.
So for those with "volt hungry" chips, try turning off the CPU PLL and lower the actual PLL voltage.
Never got a reply to my above Q due to some kind of argument going on!
I tested my 2600k tonight and got to 55x Multi (I lowered BLK) before it would fail to boot to Windows, not sure if settings/voltage was limit or if 55x was Max!
Anyhow be on my 2700k in day or so when I can be bothered swapping over!
What was the normal highest Multi for 2600k's or was 55x normal and 58x luck on a good sample?
There is no normal for 2600k just common and special. Your 55x is not uncommon but plenty won't even do that and a 58x capable CPU is a very good one indeed, there are some that do 59x and few that do 60x.
:)
Wow, man, you saved me. I couldn't get anything beyond 4.5Ghz, It took 1.39v load to get it stable at that speed and even 1.45v wasn't enough for 4.6GhzQuote:
Originally Posted by sfdmalex
I though I was stuck at 4.5Ghz, but tonight I finished 6Hs of prime blend at 4.6Ghz with 1.4V :) and now it passed 30 minutes and counting at 4.7Ghz with 1.428v (66°C / 72°C full load).
All I did was set the CPU PLL to 1.600v, instead of 1.800v. The Internal CPU PLL Overvoltage is enabled. Do you think I could lower the vCore even more without it?
Thanks, I'm starting to like this chip :)
TY, just wanted to test before swapping over as be a shame not to! :)
From the looks of it your chip is behaving very much like my own. In that case you should be able to go down to 1.365 then work your way down. But once again I'm not sure what exactly did it, the CPU PLL overvotalge OFF or the actual CPU PLL voltage (can anyone explain how the two are related?).Quote:
Originally Posted by Andi64
Try 1.365, but boost the CPU PLL to 1.63125...because my prime failed after 45min...I'm still working things out, Im trying more cpu pll to see if that caused the crash before I give it a tad more vcore, I would like to stay at 1.34.
I'm fairly new to SB processors, or Intel for that matter. I have the following hardware:
Sandy Bridge 2600K
Asus Maximus IV Extreme
2 x 2Gb Corsair Dominator GT 2133Mhz running at 1866 8 8 8 24 timings and 1.65Vdimm
I'm running 4.9Ghz for everyday use at 1.35Vcore with custom air cooling Thermalright 120 Black. I'm able to run 5.2Ghz under WinXP without HT and 1.485vcore bench stable for 3d and 2d. When I try 5.2Ghz under windows 7 it would post and as soon as it starts running windows 7 64bit it would hang either with only an underscore or at the logo screen. I tried up to 1.512Vcore and that is where I'm stuck. What do I need to look at to see if I could go higher. The temps seem to be okay, but the south bridge seems tro be getting fair warm, not hot. I put a custom fan now, but does not seem to change. I tried DICE a couple weeks back, but same story. Any software to use in Windows to change multy or BCLK. Oh I was able to boot into Windows 7 64 bit at 101 x 51 giving me 5151mhz and it is bench stable for 3dmark06, wprime 32m, cinebench 11.5 and SP32m, but no 3dmark11. Any advise would help
My 2500k is the same - its cpu pll overvoltage it doesnt like. I need 1.8cpu pll for 100bclk, 1.92cpu pll for 105.5bclk. vccsa stock 0.925v. Takes 1.58v for 5.2ghz, 1.52v for 5ghz and 1.45v for 4.8ghz. 49x max multi. Using cpu pll overvolt gets me up to 53x but its never stable in prime or gaming. Linx and superpi are fine, 3dmark 50/50.Quote:
Originally Posted by sfdmalex
cpu pll is the bugbear for me as well. I can do the switch on to enable and increase the value by rote but am never truly at ease with it. Are you leaving everything else at set values and repeating the cpu pll check repeatedly or is there some correlation (:eek:big word pain) with other settings that convinces you that you have a cpu pll problem. Does the bclk failure direct you straight to cpu pll?Quote:
Originally Posted by PiLsY
Hope that makes sense.
Im stable right now for my 24/7 clock at 47 x 102.2. If I enable PLL overvoltage it crashes gaming :). PLL OV for this chip doesnt give true stability at the higher cpu speed. Increasing CPU PLL was the key to stability at high clocks.
My first board didnt have PLL OV enabled in bios for the first few weeks so I found the limits with what I had at the time. Even when it was added to bios it only helped for benchmarking. It didnt give any extra 24/7 stability and just masked instability issues during short testing.
I've since swapped boards to a P8P67-Pro thinking it was the board doing this and its just the same. Im hoping to get another 2500k shortly so I guess I'll find out for sure then.
Haven't really pushed the envelope with OCing yet but so far I've set my 2500k @ 4.2GHz on 1.044V. Been running 24/7 stable for almost a month now. I'm not lookin for 5Ghz, but I'd really like to hit 4.5 at some point when I feel like tweaking more.
http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v1.../overclock.jpg
Gigabyte P67X UD3-B3 motherboard with a Xigmatek Gaia cooler. Think I'll be able to hit my goal of 4.5GHz?
Decided to try a 16gb kit from my x79 board in this p67 while Im waiting for a 3930k. G.Skill Ripjaws Z 2133 c9-11-10. Didnt spend much time tweaking, but it was pretty easy to run 16gb of mem without much time spent on settings/voltages. W7-64 no tweaks, 1.38VCore set in bios LLC7 1.66VDimm, 1.160VTT for 5ghz. For 5.6ghz VCore is high, didnt spend time trying to lower it just for a 32m run. Water cooled. Not sure the batch#, just grabbed a chip from the drawer labled "good" from the plastic bin I keep hardware in. Im pretty sure its a costa rica.
http://i43.tinypic.com/2iiu5c6.jpg
http://i40.tinypic.com/4f9tj.jpg
http://i42.tinypic.com/2rggqac.jpg
Great chip OC Nub. Just a few out there can do 5ghz @ 1.38 stable. Nice!
Thank you Federico.
A few 2700ks coming today in the mail
3128C083 (2X)
3126C259
also have 4X 2600ks
all batch
L104A418... one so far is 54X under SS
sn: 1452
anyone know any of the 2700k batches? second one i know splave has had... was it 55 or 56? awesome if you could chime in.. thanks!
I have a sealed Batch L137B605 and a sealed Batch L037B039 and I can't decide which one to crack open.
I plan on selling the other one and the anxiety is keeeeeeling meeeeee. :D
And, no, I won't tell you where I got that L037 chip. ;)
Any thoughts here for which one to take the plunge with?
I'm a bit skeered to jump in with a Engineering Sample as a daily driver on a high overclock, so I'm leaning towards to the other one.
BUT, if I go with the other one, it might be a little trickier finding a buyer for the little Golden Chip.
Decisions, decisions.
Test them both then keep the one you wish, bench results will sell the other.:D
It's been tested with a DMM that Internal PLL Overvoltage does not change the CPU PLL voltage at all. What is changes is anyone's guess. But this setting did not work on Engineering sample steppings (I believe the cpu's failed to POST). Only worked on final silicon. What it actually changes is anyone's guess...Quote:
Originally Posted by sfdmalex
And what was the result of your latest testing? you never posted back with results...
fyi, splave's 2700k 56x is heading down to Australia :DQuote:
Originally Posted by badatgames18
I just posted this somewhere else, but wanted to reply to your advice:Quote:
Originally Posted by flesheatinvirus
As I mentioned above, it was a factory sealed Batch L037B039, listed as a Q1J1, "Intel Confidential".
The suspense was killing me, so I popped it into my non-overclocking geared rig to see how it overclocked and the following happened:
1. Boot into Windows at stock speed.
2. Check temps.
3. Reboot into BIOS
4. Go straight to 4.6Ghz without adjusting vCore or any additional settings, other than multiplier.
5. Run Prime for 45 minutes.
6. Stop Prime. Bump multiplier. Drop voltage. Stare in disbelief.
7. Go to bed because it is 3:45am.
8. Close my eyes with a $hit-eating grin on my face for what today brings. :up:
I still have the other one sealed and once I find the limits on the ES, I'll decide how I want to proceed.
Be back later tonight with final results.
There you go, now where cooking. Sounds like the ES might just be something solid though the other chip could be killer as well. Careful testing and posting results always helps. Sounds like you are going to have a great week end. Good luck with both chips and check out the other one for your answer.:cool:
nice! should get some boints with that chip :)Quote:
Originally Posted by eva2000
here is one of the 2700ks tested so far
2700k
batch 3128C083
sn 4768
max multi: 53
Cooled by SS -47C
*probably the worst (in terms of max multi) 2700k i've seen :(
http://img836.imageshack.us/img836/3...t2700kever.jpg
So here is my latest...Quote:
Originally Posted by Falkentyne
It appears that its actually the CPU PLL Overvoltage (ON/OFF) that is making all the difference. I went back to 1.8000 for the actual voltage and have been 100% stable prime and BF3 at 1.360vCore
I was passing prime at 1.6315xxx on CPU PLL but I would BSOD whilst playing BF3, so I bumped the CPU PLL to 1.800 and now it has been stable...
I just finished 2 hours of prime small FTTs at 1.355vCore x46 at 100mhz
2700k
Batch 3126C259
sn: 0799
max multi = 52..
i quit 2700ks FOREVER.
There might be another one that validates at 5800 heading down too.Quote:
Originally Posted by eva2000
:D
That really sucks man, just average for a 2600k. They need to do a better job than this to justify the extra cost.
Its average up your end of the world but you must get better silicon than us as a lot of ours won't even do 56x
:/
Sorry, I was referring to badatgames post, 2 chips and highest multi is 53.
-Quote:
Originally Posted by humeyboy
UPDATE:
2700K has been fitted for 2 days now!
56x multi (57 stalled while Windows was booting) but not sure how to test 57 or higher as 94 BLK is as low as it can go without BSOD and I do not want to take VCore and CPU-PLL too high even though its a simple quick boot into windows with no load to check Multi in CPU-Z!
I do not have the best of cooling (TT Frio) but now 5.0GHZ is stable at 1.41*v and still testing to try for lower voltage!
My 2600k was good to 4.8GHZ with lowish voltages then not stable at 4.9GHZ with decent voltages and not stable at all at 5GHZ with any safe voltages or even a tad higher for quick test as it failed in 30seconds max in even basic IBT tests!
In testing I mean proper testing not quick PI tests like some claiming 5GHZ on 1.35*v, I am running Prime 95 and IBT at Max settings but not overnight or anything near as long for Prime95 till I get to my limit then I will do so!
Very nice cpu there.
:P
looks really good,Quote:
Originally Posted by :banana::banana::banana::banana:_43
max multi?
That is just an awesome chip...
looks good badatgames18
Why is your GLFOPS only at 66? At 4.8Ghz I consistently get 111GFLOPS and at 5Ghz I consistently get 115GFLOPS. Are you running the latest version of linpack libraries?Quote:
Originally Posted by :banana::banana::banana::banana:_43
Maybe SP1 not installed?Quote:
Originally Posted by deachus
Junk lately (purchased @ microcenter in CO):
L133B883: Max multi 51x (1.4011VID @ 4.9 :eek: )
3134B173: Max multi 51x (1.3911VID @ 4.9 :eek: )
EDIT: both 2600Ks. Is anyone buying 2700Ks ? :D
Also he is using 3072mb of 16k...Quote:
Originally Posted by deachus
i am, but not much going on there either.. (highest on bot is <58 last time i checked)Quote:
Originally Posted by ugotd8
binning select batches of 2600ks (older) is still the way to go i think.. newer ones seem to be really bad (~52X average.. everything that was made past week 10 of this year.. i've had no luck with)
Just got my GTX580 Classi hooked up with my 2600K on my old ud5, 3DM11 and Vantage coming up.
Can anyone tell me what code 58 is on a M4E ? I just got my single stage going and it wont boot .... :(
Same batch Core i7 2700K 3126C259 Costa Rica cpu arrived today from Splave and finally can play with 55x and 56x multi.Quote:
Originally Posted by badatgames18
The cpu is definitely hotter than my 2600K but much better overclocker without Internal PLL overvoltage needed, the 2700K can bench HyperPi 16M Pi x8 instances all the way to 51x multi for 5100Mhz, while my 2600K started to need Internal PLL OV around 4700Mhz.
- Core i7 2700K 3126C256
- Asus Maxmus IV Gene-Z 0902 bios
- 2x2GB Gskill 17600 PIS 7-10-10-28 rated
- Sapphire HD5870 flashed to Asus bios
- 80GB Intel X25-M SSD
- 1200W Silverstone OP1200
2700K @5600Mhz
First up disable HT due to heat (can hit > 80+C under load if HT enabled) for 56x multi can only manage 8M Pi but this is just on Corsair H50-1 H20.
Super Pi 8M
http://fileshosts.com/intel2011/asus...1m18s938ms.png
Super Pi 1M
http://fileshosts.com/intel2011/asus...1m_6s656ms.png
2700K @5558Mhz
32M Pi run
http://fileshosts.com/intel2011/asus...9s266ms_tn.png
looks great bro! :D
I've got an L118434A here batch 3124C542 that is going in to a P8P67 Pro. Any suggestions on where to start? This is my first go with these newer chips, been running an I7-920 for a very long time ;p Seeing all this stuff about PLL overvoltage, no overvoltage, changing the PLL manually, etc.
nice eva2000! :up:
what cooling are you using?
on Corsair H50-1 H20.
water cooling
Mine i7 2700K does 4.6 at 1.32v and 4.8 at 1.37v.
For 5 GHz needs 1.45v.
I have bad luck for good clockers :(
Batch: 3122C590
Quote:
Originally Posted by badatgames18
yup using Corsair H50-1 H20 :)Quote:
Originally Posted by GLENBOY
Nice cpu George :)
Guys, my M4E is dead so what am I going to replace it with? Its going under single stage so I just want a mobo thats going to let the cpu clock as well as it can, I dont need multiple pcie's so I was thinking of going with a Gene-Z, what do you guys think? Or buy another M4E?
Any help would be great.
:)
Well my Mobo is a POS and that one you mention is its little brother!
You get zero support and until recently only 2 Bios were released and now about 6 in total have been released with 2 pulled so that leaves 4 and all since launched around May 2011 AFAIR.
To put in perspective the brand new X79 ROG was launched recently and is at same 90X Bios build branch already!
I have had pretty good luck with UD7, many changes of CPUs and multiple times testing on Dice(LN2 for graphic card), board is still working flawlessly...Ofcourse my luck with chips have not been great sadly..Quote:
Originally Posted by aussie-revhead
I have tortured my P8P67 EVO on water many times and its been great but this M4E is a worry .... its got code 00 now, anyone know what that is?
:(
Edit: Mobo is alive, cpu is dead, RIP another 56x cpu .... now to buy another ....
:)
Try setting off the LN2 mode.Quote:
Originally Posted by aussie-revhead
Its a false alarm, the cpu is dead, M4E is alive but I tested another 2600K on the M4E and it locks up at 4300 at any volts, so I tried it on another mobo with air cooling, it went a little higher oddly but locks at 4500, what the hell is this? Faulty cpu? Worst ever 2600K for overclocking? Or is something else at play here?
Any help would be great.
:)
PLL Overvoltage enabled?
Its on auto as I always leave it, just tested it on a third mobo and the same thing happens. Doesnt internal PLL come into play closer to 5ghz? Its worth a try though.
:)
Edit: Internal PLL enabled and it got to 4900 then locked at 5000.... not great but its better, that was with 1.5v too so maybe its just a poor chip and needs lots of volts.
Im going to buy a new chip tomorrow, are you guys getting better results with 2600K or 2700K?
:P
Depends, if you have a low CPU mhz wall, some processors need PLL overvoltage enabled as low as 4300 mhz, which means their absolute maximum clocks will be about 4800 mhz. It's rare, but it happens. And Auto is the same as disabled. Never seen auto enable it if it needed to be enabled, since the CPU simply won't post successfully (or will do overclock failed or a boot loop on gigabyte boards) if you're at the point where it needs to be on.
Auto cant be the same as disabled, I have benched up to 5650 on water with Internal PLL on auto so it must enable itself at some point.
I got this cpu up to 4900 with 1.500v so yes its just a low wall cpu, this is the first time I have enabled internal PLL manually.
Has anyone tried a set of the g.skill 1600 ECO C7 rams? I was wondering if they can overclock well since they are BBSE equipped.
:)