Honda: Did I miss anything?
http://www.xtremesystems.org/forums/...=1#post5110030
Printable View
Honda: Did I miss anything?
http://www.xtremesystems.org/forums/...=1#post5110030
@maxxx you're wrong, i missed your score lol.
Sorry man, I was updating my reply (#476) with link.Quote:
Originally Posted by Hondacity
Many thanks for your effort....
-updated
maxxx welcome back btw. awesome quick top20 result
Thanks Honda. Been a struggle. And still struggling to break that result.Quote:
maxxx welcome back btw. awesome quick top20 result
Alternatively you can test yourself. :)Quote:
Originally Posted by AMDnord
Convert RTL CLK to ns, and look at the disparity between steps in WCL and frequency limits.
-Raja
i dont have z77/P67 atm, only 990fx on which i tried many things and didnt see any "real difference" thats why i am waiting for others results :D
Quote:
Originally Posted by AMDnord
I think the data that was provided by Cheapseats is incomplete for use on IB until quantified fully. There has to be a real shift in the IMC side schedule for there to be any gain in performance. I have seen one place where the RTL remains static with a CAS shift but have not compared that against a drop in TWCL. What someone needs to do is find the RTL clock shift and then plot that against TWCL clock margins. If the RTL changes (lower) or stays static, then the performance has to increase to some extent (even if small), otherwise there will be an eventual buffer overflow.
I am busy now for the next 3 weeks so it will be a time before I get to this. I provided the approximated read equation a few pages back and how to work it all out above, so someone can run with it if they have the time, or I will get to it eventually. :)
@Hondacity, I also had an update on the same page as maxx see post 429 http://www.xtremesystems.org/forums/...=1#post5109910
No hurry to put it up just letting you know.
excellent improvement C-N, 2600C9 is very nice :D
-updated
Honda why i dont enter the rank ? i have all done well
http://www.xtremesystems.org/forums/...llenge!/page18
Thanks !!!
Sergio
the link you're providing leads me to no score. please correct thanks
@andresergio you can use your own format. but to be in the rankings you have to use the required format.
andressergio - 6:43.410 - 50x100 - 4x2GB PATRIOT VIPER EXTREME@ 1200MHz - 11-12-12-31-1T - 1.65v (AIR cooled memory, - WATER Cooled CPU) - ASUS Maximus Xtreme Formula IV
ZenEffect - 6:33:058 - 50x100 - 1333.8MHz - 8-11-6-19-232-1 - Gigabyte UD5 - Kingston 2333mhz 2x1gb/BBSE - 1.72v - stock air
how many seconds are you guys getting from wazza 2-3?
3-3.5 consistentlyQuote:
Originally Posted by Splave
waza is still a challenge for me on this platform,
one thing i have noted though, as your memory timings get tighter and tighter, waza becomes more consistent,
for me when testing waza with "loose" memory secondaries my waza can swing around a bit, but when i tighten up those secondaries it becomes more consistent,
i think 2-3 seconds is a fair estimate, but it also depends on your OS, so does waza size, copy techniques, wait times, etc
HondaQuote:
Originally Posted by Hondacity
i updated it thats why i linked you
http://www.xtremesystems.org/forums/...llenge!/page18
cheers !!!
Sergio
Does wazaa on an SSD have any ill effect? My wazaa method might not be as good as the rest as it made my results 3 seconds slower. Same OS and tweaks, same wazaa as in my good ol' raptor. :confused:
I am re-checking the OS tweaks as I may have missed something. This is on WinXP. I couldn't get Win2k3 to run properly on IB (always shows 35x in the OS even though in I have it set higher in the BIOS/UEFI). lolz
TIA....
fix your link... no such page18 exist yet.Quote:
Originally Posted by andressergio
here HondaQuote:
Originally Posted by Hondacity
andressergio - 6:40.561 - 50x100 - 1300MHz - 12-12-12-31-1T 1,65v - ASUS Maximus Xtreme Formula IV - 4x2GB 2400 C11 PATRIOT VIPER EXTREME/Hynix - 1.65v - Air
http://img11.imageshack.us/img11/5929/spi32.jpg
Uploaded with ImageShack.us
GUN'G'STAR - 6:19:156 - 50x100 - 1400 - 10-12-12-21-112-1 - M5G - sams - 1,87 - all on air
Attachment 127560
initial and 1st loop are good but rest...
looks like something wrong with my waza, am i right?
initial loop should be irrelevant for result, got 3 different, 4.313, 28x and 265 and same result.
sometimes first 5 loops are strong and then time gets worse...depends on waza yes..
anyway..strong result :cool:
Splave - 6.19.578 - 100x50 - 1300 MHz - 8-12-8-28-80-1 - ASUS MVF - G.Skill PI DDR3-2300 2x2Gb / PSC - 1.86V - Air
http://i.imgur.com/IfdFn.jpg
Getting stronger, melting Vaseline as I type this :) (dont get a boner Honda) rofl...chip is limited to 2610mhz mem speed on air (it is worse cold) so will just be tightening timings..
Changed from 1.8gb to 3.2gb .rar, I think bigger file is necessary on SSD
@raja thanks for the answers
lol
air-sanity! dang sub 6'20s
nice run Splave!