Well it does look like they're taking their sweet time so I wouldn't be surprised if they jumped Kepler to 700 series. I just think that's way too consistent naming for Nvidia. :ROTF:
Printable View
Well it does look like they're taking their sweet time so I wouldn't be surprised if they jumped Kepler to 700 series. I just think that's way too consistent naming for Nvidia. :ROTF:
Lol
Enjoy. Some of it is spot on, some of it, who knows, but finally there's something real. (=confirmed)
http://i41.tinypic.com/9h6xe9.png
Nvidia made a 6970?
This is quite old actually. Do you have some kind of confirmation about these specs? If so, what kind of confirmation?Quote:
Originally Posted by Vardant
It's old, I know. It's funny though, cause the same thing happened at least once already. Unbelievable spec show up, people discard them, ask for real info and few weeks later, somebody tells them, they had them all along.
The same source also confirmed the rumors about the $299 price. It solely depends on the final clocks, obviously, but it's a possibility.
So I'm guessing the GK104 specs are right with the exception of TMUs (could be 96), TDP (around 170W) and clocks (due to A3 I'm guessing between 1100 and 1150).
Hot, cold? :D
So because Chiphell post a table that == legite?
-PB
The exact same table have been allready posted the 2 jan by Olivion... http://www.xtremesystems.org/forums/...=1#post5026626 post 35.Quote:
Originally Posted by Vardant
The source was allready coming from chiphell: http://www.chiphell.com/thread-338350-1-1.html
I discarded it the first time I saw it too, but something has changed.
Exactly?! :shrug: been waiting for Keplar details for ages..Quote:
Originally Posted by paulbagz
What would that be?Quote:
Originally Posted by Vardant
Somebody trustworthy confirmed them.
Very interesting indeed! But not everything in this table is correct?
For example, in the case of GK104, they have the bus width and ROPs right, but the TMU number is different. TDP will also change after they finalize the clocks.
That fits with the info a guy gave in another forum. He said, one column is almost completely correct, the others not so much. I guess he was talking about GK104 column. I still bet on 96 TMUs and <200W TDP.
Quote:
Originally Posted by boxleitnerb
LoooooooL.
I quess its fair to say that Cheetah is almost a dog and Tiger is almost a cat.
Until we have any reliable source, we feed on rumors and give those websites a thousands of clicks per "leak". (Y)
Ok, somebody confirmed ROP count and bus width specs, but what about the most important specs like CUDA cores count or hot clock absence? :shrug:
For GK104, this time their marketing team won't use "DirectX 11 done right" (as they did with GF104) but "Cayman done right" :PQuote:
Originally Posted by Roadhog
Oh, yeah, sorry about that, core number for GK104 is also right and that confirms no hot clock.Quote:
Originally Posted by japamd
With that specs (and if efficiency per unit is not completely down the toilet) GK104 should be able to approach the 7970 sometimes but mostly duel with the 7950 and win slightly.
Something is sure, if they go from 512 cudacores ( FP+Int ) to 2304SP, the SP are absolutely nothing similar to what is find on Fermi. or divided ( 1Alu for FP and 1 for Int ), or a lot smaller. will be hard to compare.Quote:
Originally Posted by boxleitnerb
Has anyone got links as to where the no hotclock rumour originated?
-PB
I would rather guess 2048. GK104 would have 4x the amount of GF114, I would assume the same for GK110 vs. GF110.Quote:
Originally Posted by Lanek
Seems AMD/nvidia arch is converging...
Is the gk104 still due out this month?