Did quick setting in Bios on 9911 and ran a bench, no memory tweaks yet. Just feeling out Cores and NB.
http://3800z24.info/CHVF/fx8120-8150....8_2.6_1.6.jpg
Printable View
Did quick setting in Bios on 9911 and ran a bench, no memory tweaks yet. Just feeling out Cores and NB.
http://3800z24.info/CHVF/fx8120-8150....8_2.6_1.6.jpg
AMD FX-8120 @ 4933 MHz, 8.12
http://img836.imageshack.us/img836/3...2020110000.png
so im a little late, but heres my submission of a 1055T from one of the earliest thuban batches
this is a 'little' better than my 3.4ghz run, lol
this is on water btw
Where's the CB and CPU-z screen shots? + What type of cooling (Air, H2O, etc?)Quote:
Originally Posted by Particle
I didn't take any picture as I wasn't doing runs for this thread when I ran it. All I've got is the recorded result in CB from when I was testing some overclocking stuff. I might run it again and take a snap if you wish.
Cooling wise, that's with a Corsair H100 (water). It wasn't possible with the Core Contact Freezer I was using before. Load temps would almost hit 90C and it would crash while the H100 keeps it <= 60C. heh
Mine is H20, thanks for adding me!Quote:
Originally Posted by ReKcOlNu
I buy new cooler, A70 from Corsair (my last air cooler ever!) and I will give at it 2x Ultra Kaze 3000 RPM, think, this will be as H100 with stock fans.
Here you go:
http://pcrpg.org/pics/misc/fx8120cb.png
:clap:Quote:
Originally Posted by Particle
Update
I am having issues with NB clocking and my RAM doesn't clock well either.
FX 8120
4.9ghz cores 1.52v
2.4ghz NB 1.2v
1600mhz MEM
Water
8.04pts
http://3800z24.info/CHVF/fx8120-8150....9_2.4_1.6.jpg
http://i453.photobucket.com/albums/q...igg_2009/g.png
Tried with my 890FX board.
Man, my 8120 is the shiz......
http://3800z24.info/CHVF/uber.jpg
Wow! :eek:Quote:
Originally Posted by charged3800z24
FX6100 on the hit list...
5Ghz 6x first slow run done
http://i168.photobucket.com/albums/u...sierra/3D5.png
8150 6C test on ss
http://img10.imageshack.us/img10/652...nshot036rx.jpg
Charged: wtf?:-D.....
charged, that is one killer result. How did you do it? Or shall I ask how the FX CPU was able to give such a great result?Quote:
Originally Posted by charged3800z24
He's just joking...
u can get this result by going to your cinebench folder : CINEBENCH_11.529\cb_ranking
next, you can improvise...
And so I learn.... Thanks for explaining. Just thought that maybe someone was able to unlock a huge amount of extra performance out of this "not so great" chip. Having said that, I'm waiting for them to be available in SA to buy one with a UD7.
Guys, I didn't do any of the such. It just gave that result. I have no idea why lol.... I ran a test again and it gave me a normal result. It is obvious a glitch though...
http://3800z24.info/CHVF/uber-eh.jpg
lol...and i thought that you just did it for joke...my bad, sorry...
Charged, you trully unlocked FX CPU!
This is how they were planned to perform, but due to agreement with Intel AMD had to throttle them down a lot ;)
Charged: or maybe...you found the true power of FX chip :-).
Did you check to see if your system clock was still showing the correct time of day?
I recall running a bench on an old machine, ages ago. It had a turbo button in it, but the machine design was stupid - the real-time clock update frequency was tied to the CPU frequency. So when you used turbo to make things faster, you couldn't measure the difference using the PC's clock, because it had counted faster as well.
More commonly, I've run into systems where a chunk of assembly code will disable interrupts while running a critical section; then the system clock loses updates and the benchmark measures much faster completion because very little time passed, according to the clock.
quick test for my fx-8150
http://img.techpowerup.org/111025/cinebench.jpg