Ahhh... I see.Quote:
Originally Posted by OBR
Nnice edit though.
Printable View
Ahhh... I see.Quote:
Originally Posted by OBR
Nnice edit though.
That should be about right, considering this:Quote:
Originally Posted by OBR
http://hwbot.org/searchResults.do?di...inTotalPoints=
Perkam
:rolleyes:Quote:
Originally Posted by OBR
What did you do....copy paste several screens from the web and put it all together.
OBR:its really 4890 or only simulation HD4870 OC?(i read some about 13% up in 3dmark )
try extreme preset.
You know something, aren't you :p:Quote:
Originally Posted by Sampsa
Is your NDA prohibiting you from disclosing how this card clocks? Lets say a range of clocks like 1000-1300MHz?
RV670 build on 55GT process could do 1300MHz+ with proper cooling, I wonder how far this one will go!
:rofl::ROTF::rofl::ROTF::rofl:Quote:
Originally Posted by SNiiPE_DoGG
Its early sample of HD4890 (one month old), with first PCB (9450 instead 9460), this card has 6+8 PSU pins, retail has 6+6 ... THIS IS REAL HD4890, ... but drivers arrivedy yestarday.Quote:
Originally Posted by FlanK3r
next step ...
http://i41.tinypic.com/20f6g05.jpg
18594 for the engineering sample then?
Out of curiosity with an i7 920 what does a 4870x2 and a GTX 285 score on average to compare?
i will test GTX 260 + 280 today against, on the same machine
Now OBR, good posts to reclaim "some" lost cred you've had in this forum, keep it coming sir. :)
I will wait for results from someone who knows how to use hardware.
1. Dont be envious LowERun, that i have everything HOT HW and you nothing ...
2. Its time for reality for ATi Dreamers ...
http://i39.tinypic.com/1zg9sg1.jpg
http://i44.tinypic.com/2uj5s8o.jpg
http://i43.tinypic.com/24gm98z.jpg
Welcome AMDus Rebrandus, ONE year of waiting for Oced HD4870! Great success (okay, tested with no official and oddity drivers - results are not final)!
Performance is really between GTX 260 (216) and GTX 280 - ideal for GTX 275!
PS. Not tested by me, but friend!
Tnx for the benches OBR !
I know now what my next card is.
HD4890 & HD4890 CrossFire benchmarks
http://www.overclockers.com.ua/news/...hd-4890-01.png
http://www.overclockers.com.ua/news/...-03-19/103501/
Translated
By "HOT HW" you mean your HD4870 is hot because you overclocked it? :shrug:Quote:
Originally Posted by OBR
And the masses see 3dmark first :shakes: 1280 x 1024 is definitely the measure of how good a GPU is !!!!!! NOT
that extreme preset result is VERY promising though....
With all the Radeon bashing OBR is doing I would take those results with a grain of salt. :ROTF:
1. 1280x1024 is simply to low
2. Rumors are surfacing of a GTX 275 to compete with the 4890
3. Vantage incorporates the use of physx in the cpu benchmarks which does effect the overall score
1- Your position as reviewer should be impartial.Quote:
Originally Posted by OBR
2- You are a Nv fanboy.
3- Looks like tests where from friend and without drivers.
4- AMDus Rebrandus? You need some reality check. Cut the crap and go buy one 8800GTS 512Mb or 9800GTX or 9800GTX+ or GTS250 in it's four consecutive rebranding.
Lay off the fanboy-calling m8. It only makes things worse.Quote:
Originally Posted by v_rr
@ OBR, we don't need posts like that from you either.
I will say what I have been saying for weeks now.
WAIT FOR APRIL 6TH.
Perkam
Let the price war begin, I sold my 9800GTX+ and will need a new card mid april ! we got plenty of power coming it seems in the 250 buck market !
Dude trust me, there's nothing you've ever done here on XS that would make me envious :slapass:Quote:
Originally Posted by OBR
i see no sign of enabled PhysX here. The CPU-Score would be much higher :shrug:Quote:
Originally Posted by Eastcoasthandle
Darn, after i thought he has somehow got some sanity, OBR proved me wrong yet again with another trolling, attention seeking post of his, what a shame.