Printable View
i dont know if you are trying to seduce me into a trap to get me banned again, but i clearly stated 3.2+GHz, because shintai said there where nehalems much higher clocked then 3.2GHzQuote:
Originally Posted by Donnie27
and this will be my final statement in this thread
I'd hope he learned something, oh well.Quote:
Originally Posted by tiro_uspsss
not a chance by the looks of itQuote:
Originally Posted by Donnie27
Seems that way.Quote:
Originally Posted by tiro_uspsss
Did i miss something?Quote:
Originally Posted by tiro_uspsss
nope, different..Quote:
Originally Posted by tiro_uspsss
:doh:Quote:
Originally Posted by Movieman
nope! ;)Quote:
Originally Posted by BrowncoatGR
'confirmed' ;) :DQuote:
Originally Posted by Donnie27
i hope its a permaban this time
If Gothr3k is unbanned why does it still say banned under his user name?
he *was* unbanned - for a very short time - which he made use of to troll *again* which led to him being banned again *voila*!Quote:
Originally Posted by Kingcarcas
lets move on ;) :up:
Quote:
Originally Posted by tiro_uspsss
god, how can someone be that stupid (sry for that)... just continuing there where he stoped... without a lesson learned :stick: :slapass:...
hey! ur only a few hrs drive away from him right? :D - pay him a visit - for all of us! :devil:Quote:
Originally Posted by Hornet331
:up:
He wasn't banned for that (though it certainly didn't help his case). He was banned for the same reason as his previous ban.
He has threatened to return, so if y'all see him/know a new account of his, we'd appreciate a heads-up :) :bows:
/discussion
*sings* a huntin' we will go, a huntin' we wil go, hey-ho-dairy-oh a huntin' we will goQuote:
Originally Posted by Vapor
:D
This is a few days old, but I didn't see it posted, and perhaps it will get discussion back on track:
New Bloomfield 2.66 GHz Benchmarks from ChipHell:
http://www.techpowerup.com/index.php?65297
- 1M Super PI run at 15.475s
- Vantage CPU score .. 16294
- Cinebench xCPU score .. 12627
Quote:
In the 3DMark Vantage test, the processor secured a CPU score of 16294. It crunched Super Pi 1M in 15.475 seconds. With the Cinebench, it secured 3048 with a single thread, the multi-threaded bench belted out 12627 CB-CPU hinting at the processor's high multi-core efficiency. And finally, Bloomfield takes SANDRA out on a date. You have to look at the red dot compared to a QX9770 yourself.
Sure Face, it is just over-hyping LOL!Quote:
Originally Posted by Face
woot sandra benches! :D
btw. is there a chance that the spec bench suite can run on nehalem on its current state?
So it is 30% faster (aprox) than a QX9770 at least in sabdra that is a lot given the MHz diference. I'm looking forward to Nehalem :)
Wow so far this new toy is looking amazing....but how much of the increase is from a different board me wonders?
..you mean X58?Quote:
Originally Posted by Caveman787
It hardly has any bearing on the performance any more, all the relevant stuff is on the CPU now, northbridge, memory controller, the lot.
Not true.Quote:
Originally Posted by bowman
Lots of the early X58 boards are having trouble running Tri-channel memory, even though Nehalem has an IMC.
This bug WILL be corrected before retail boards ship, however.
I tend to agree. I have no inside info but adding up all I've seen these boards look crippled to me and the memory usage seems to be where the problems are on these pre release boards.Quote:
Originally Posted by mstp2009
Hehe - so the IMC isn't the problem solver it may have appeared at first
And you say this why?Quote:
Originally Posted by Anemone
Some say Bug, Others say it is crippled by Intel. I wonder what's really going on:confused:Quote:
Originally Posted by mstp2009
If that's a mobo teething issue, then you have to conclude that design changes in the mobo can affect the performance of the IMC.Quote:
Lots of the early X58 boards are having trouble running Tri-channel memory, even though Nehalem has an IMC.