:hehe:
:poke: that was even less funny. subambient :confused:
Printable View
I can't post though... The code on my mobo reads "fubar"... Any idea what that means???
that means it needs another 90 deg. turn to work even better, try it ;)
seriously guys, there WILL be some destroyed CPU if we continue with this :yepp:
and this is some kind of spam after all :rolleyes:
EDIT: oh, and eddy when can we expect the 'full performance' plate to be available, I need that one to replace my Storm so my pump wouldn't feel a big shock of having such low restriction :D
sorry guys...
please follow instructions carefully when installing CPUs
Well, I thought what the hell and tried the Supreme block on my new Asus P5K-E and what did I see?
It does fit both ways
So hereby confirmed that the P5K-E is no problem for the block, no matter which way you want to mount it :up:
It fits the "older " Abit QuadGT too, although it was close.
Clearance between plate and the mosfet cooler is about 1mm, maybe even less.
Installed my 6750 and mounted the block with the inlets horizontally.
On thursday, I'll mount the block with the inlets pointed vertically, and see if we get any difference in temps.
It would be nice to see some results with a pump other than an Iwaki .
D5 ,MCP355/DDC3.2 , something more along the line of a commonly used pump would clarify the performance of the block most of us can expect .
I second that suggestion but thats not to say I'm complaining about all the hard work and testings that had been carried out so far.
Also, I would liked to remind everyone that this block is NOT cheaper than the Fuzion (even with the nozzles's cost included) as previously mentioned
Nikhsub1 ,the Iwakis are the best WC pump made,no argument there. But I bet less than 5% of the WC crowd uses them. Dedicated PSU, and high cost of Iwakis are enough to scare all but the most extreme amongst us.
Unless I missed it zbogorgon did not mention the pump voltage used.
The best pump on the market might give skewed performance figure most people might wrongly expect to get from a restrictive block.
Just for reference sake it would be nice to see some numbers majority of us can acheive with commonly used gear...I'm just wondering if the Supreme's awesome performance will still be there or be near a bowed Apogee GTX or a FuZion + washer-nozzle kit.
You should read my results. GTX v Supreme tested with same setup, same ambient, same coolant, thermalpaste etc. A different pump may yield different results, but the supreme should still be consistently cooler. In theory...Quote:
I'm just wondering if the Supreme's awesome performance will still be there or be near a bowed Apogee GTX or a FuZion + washer-nozzle kit.
RLM
Well I also tried the vertical mount, it results in 1, maybe 2 degrees c higher temps... nothing dramatical but for me I'm going back to the horizontal mount :)
Now I'm curious what temps Jupiler will get with his block... hope he lets uw know ASAP :p:
Looks like performance-pcs.com just got all the new EK blocks and accessories in yesterday. Given all the problems you guys are having with this block though, maybe I'll wait until there's a concensus on the fix for the plate/mounting issue. For the $70 asking price this thing should be damn perfect out of the box. Granted, we ARE riders of the bleeding edge with all this extreme overclocking-this and watercooling-that, so I can't get too upset, right? :)
I can't wait for the first EK / Fuzion / GT / GTX shootout!!
http://www.performance-pcs.com/catal...order=6&page=2
Not good news ( live from test ):
- Dtek flow - 258 l/h
- Supreme flow - 158 l/h !!!
With low pump: 2*C worse than dtek
With high pump: 1*C worse than dtek
Test in progress by Jaro ( ShackIT Crew ) ...
dtek huh... bowed/nozzled whatever?
Next results:
- 0,5* on mcp655 #5
- 0,9* on mcp655 #1
D-tek ( non-nozzled non-bowed ) wins :)
Each block was 4 times mount. And this results are delta between best mounts.