hmm. it's been way more than 10 minutes. what's goin on? :stick:Quote:
Originally Posted by irev210
Printable View
hmm. it's been way more than 10 minutes. what's goin on? :stick:Quote:
Originally Posted by irev210
well xs went down for me for a few minutes... and i've been playing :)
x1900xtx at stock speed scored 7219 with my T2600 at 3100
now taking out the physx ppu
brb
okay, i actually scored 7282 or somethign
without the agiea, i scored 7303
so it does nothing at this point, but let me play with the demo lol
what was the FPS on the CPU scores?
Quote:
Originally Posted by ex2cib
same with and without...
2613 vs 2612
ill put some screenshots up tomorrow
depressing :(
Wow, maybe there needs to be some tweaking.
Do you have to have the full 3dmark for Physx support?
as far as i know 3dmark uses the ageia physx software physics libraries, but the PPU hardware wasn't available at the time for futuremark to enable support in 3dmark06
it may just get a patch sometime in the (hopefully near) future
Any games currently supported by the physx?
http://physx.ageia.com/titles.html
there's a list for ya.
Quote:
Originally Posted by pik-ard v1.1
watch the trailers, looks good
trying pcmark 2005 now
Wow, I overlooked the trailors before. That explosion looks awesome. :)Quote:
Originally Posted by irev210
yea their tight as :banana::banana::banana::banana:Quote:
Originally Posted by bigboi86
my xp-m 2500+ could do that.. forget the name of the program but it had a whole bunch of physics tests in it.Quote:
Originally Posted by irev210
Where are you from?
128mb
Looks like a Patch may enable the actual utilisation of PPU in 3D06...
Damn, one more thing to throw money for :s
check out the AVI i just uploaded with my crappy video camera
the cubes were falling so fast, the camera couldnt focus :(
06 uses the AGEIA sofware SDK but this does not mean it applies it to the AGEIA hardware, in fact it does not. It's a cpu test only, whether Futuremark will release a patch to support it I doubt very much as 06 is very much an imporved intermediate bench until the next big 3dmark for the next Microsoft DX10 / WGF / D310.11 or whatever it is called. I guess then AGEIA, nvidia's havoc and Ati's physics processing power may all be benched so we can see which is the best one.
If 4 gpu's are getting more mainstream by then I would guess it would be nice to have 3 gpu's doing the graphics and one doing the physics. If you could stop the bench between tests a la 2001 then you assign the gpu's as you wish of course ! That would make it a very interesting bench to compete in :D
Regards
Andy
I ran that demo without the card :p:Quote:
Originally Posted by irev210
Where did you buy it? I want one too.
i wish i could find the old demo. The old block demo was a lot better than that one i thought.
funny that everybody was screaming for benches at the very beginng not knowing they will not affect the scores in any way.
I think you all should calm down for the moment - maybe this is a nice to have but completely useless imo for now.
wow you can run pcmark faster...I think it is worth waiting another 3 or 4 month until software is there to fire this piece up.
but I am wondering as well how fast they're out now ^^
price for one of these?
if you download the drivers for this and install them you can run this demo
I know this sounds stupid, but would this possibly help in folding output?
I know therte not physics or anything, but isnt this kind of an aid th processing?
Sorry for being a pain but could you comment on fan noise and heat output of this thing? I take it there is probably not a temp sensor that we can monitor so we will never really know how hot it gets but I am concerned of adding more whine and noise to my case with that fan. Thanks.
BTW, what manufacturer did you get?