:woot:
Very great run on P4 + ATI hardware.
Prescott is still good processor.
:clap:
Printable View
:woot:
Very great run on P4 + ATI hardware.
Prescott is still good processor.
:clap:
If u wait long enough before booting up u will have a insulated tube too :DQuote:
Originally Posted by GoriLLakoS
I think macci has something to remove also... ;)
http://img465.imageshack.us/img465/2281/119rh.jpg
Yeah, bugged Nature there. Otherwise I'd think his Drago low would be much higher as well.
Congrats on the amazing P4 run Ky :D
macci's run isn't bugged but it seems he knows something about benching a CF setup that no one else does. Maybe a driver/registry tweak. He got Pedro to share, I wonder if we can coax him into doing the same :)
Too bad Jason didn't mention his card clocks, it's really pretty important when comparing ORB results that don't have them by default.
this shows the true class of an overclocker like kyosen :toast:Quote:
Originally Posted by kyosen
I still just love the thought of Macci waking up in the morning, driving to work and benching :)Quote:
Originally Posted by G H Z
Insane gfx clocks I guess...
Nothing out of the ordinary about Macci's score...other than that he's the only person out there who bothered do an optimized A64 dual core + crossfire run...now for how long will he be? ;)Quote:
Originally Posted by G H Z
nice score...57K....but like u said its bugged so guess its too bad...but 55K aint bad either..lol..
If it's not bugged then why would every test be lower except nature? Regardless of CPU bottlenecking on other tests, I would think Drago Low would be a lot higher as well... Doesn't seem right still
I was thinking same as well, all are lower except for nature..
Im not saying its bugged or anything, just seems wierd to me as well..
But its macci hes da man, if he thought it was bugged im sure hed do the same as kyo and take it down also..
.6599 Ati2dvag.dll same as everyone else.Quote:
Originally Posted by Willis
Unless the is some trickery with the version which is highly unlikely macci's run was using the same public version of Cat 6.2.
I asked Jason about his run,
860/840, RD580, 3689Mhz FX60 LOD +3 = 676FPS Nature.
macci's run
774/870, ES RD580, 3443Mhz FX60 LOD +? = 766FPS
Now you tell me whats happening here if it's the same driver. +4 might give a few more FPS but no where near enough to make 90FPS ;)
Jason's run is interesting...if he had the same clock for clock power as Macci, I don't think anyone could deny that he'd be at 56k at least, probably past 57k. He might need to try different Cat AI settings. No offense to him, but his single card 01 is definitely lagging too...
u are right ghz there must be a tweak or something :D
Jason hit 50.2k last night isangle card "mastercard" at 890/810 only wiht a dualcore.Quote:
Originally Posted by Gautam
If Macci has some sort of special tweak thats fine. Would be nice if he shared it ;)
Should be closer to 51-52k with that sort of CPU/GPU power IMHO. Then again, if he used WinXP again it wouldn't be a surprise. His 05 score is amazing, would be nice to see him go for more. :D