Coolaler 7900GTX 3dmark scores

Printable View

Show 100 post(s) from this thread on one page

03-08-2006, 09:48 AM
kiwi

After such results I am guessing the price
03-08-2006, 11:16 AM
IvanAndreevich

Damn, that core is tiny :clap: Hopefully the price will reflect that.

No surprises here. If the GT yields are good so they can clock to ~650 MHz on stock cooling, it might be a killer deal for 300 USD.

Just sold my 7800GTs so I have to pick something up soon.
03-08-2006, 11:27 AM
zakelwe

Don't forget quad core Sli soon so really the small die size and getting the core cheap is as important to nvidia as single card figures to be honest I would say.

Also, it would be nice to know whether thr 7900GT is like the 7800GT and has 5 quads rather than 6, or whether it has 6. If it has 6 it might overclock well and be the new 4400ti\6800GT bargain.

Regards

Andy
03-08-2006, 11:35 AM
IvanAndreevich

It is known - 7900GT has exact same number of all execution units as 7900GTX as was the case with 6800GT vs 6800U.
03-08-2006, 12:15 PM
SIOUX

Well..here is my XTX stock clocks, and 3ghz single core:)

http://img300.imageshack.us/img300/1...t62nolod9u.jpg
03-08-2006, 12:27 PM
perkam

Quote:

Originally Posted by _JP_

Not True...Have 1.1ns GDDR3.

I said some :) And here's proof: http://global.aopen.com.tw/products/...GTX-DVD512.htm

Plus, if Nvidia isn't guaranteeing 1.1ns on GTX, then same thing will happen as with X1900XT. Early batches may get 1.1ns and later batches will get 1.2ns. Check the link, there are already GTX's that have guaranteed 1.2ns ;)

Perkam
03-08-2006, 12:37 PM
Levish

o_O

I was hoping it'd be 5-10% higher than a x1900xt all things stock but it looks to be about exactly the same scores but with a Nvidia logo.

I'm not sure if there is any benefit of this at all.
03-08-2006, 12:40 PM
Rovtar

Card can be good but the price too :S
03-08-2006, 12:44 PM
SIOUX

Quote:

Originally Posted by Willis

lemme guess..
273 @ 1.5-2-2-5 :slap:

Try again....214 1.5-2-2-5;) :)
03-08-2006, 12:47 PM
SIOUX

Quote:

Originally Posted by Willis

lemme guess...

LOD +3 :slap:

:D

Try ones again...NO LOD. This is my 24/7 setup:) :D
03-08-2006, 12:50 PM
_JP_

Quote:

Originally Posted by perkam

I said some :) And here's proof: http://global.aopen.com.tw/products/...GTX-DVD512.htm

Plus, if Nvidia isn't guaranteeing 1.1ns on GTX, then same thing will happen as with X1900XT. Early batches may get 1.1ns and later batches will get 1.2ns. Check the link, there are already GTX's that have guaranteed 1.2ns ;)

Perkam

The most importante brands like Asus, BFG, XFX, MSI...should come with 1.1ns ;)
03-08-2006, 12:54 PM
metro.cl

i dont trust your scores you might have optimizations, we just have to wait and see 2 rigs with similar config and similar os
03-08-2006, 12:56 PM
Levish

I get 10.5 - 11k with a fx60/x1900xt all stock cat 6.2

is it so hard to believe that he can get 12k with a x1900xtx and a slight oc?
03-08-2006, 01:11 PM
SIOUX

Belive what you want guys. Nothing i can do about that:) i got 11725 with the catalyst from the CD,and now 12k with 6.2

I have no reason for making fake scores guys.

http://img317.imageshack.us/img317/6977/0528kv.jpg
03-08-2006, 01:43 PM
Elfear

Who's to say the guy with the 7900GTX didn't have a tweaked OS? Sioux's scores look about right and like he said, what reason does he have to fabricate scores.

PlatoonSgtElias got 12,575 at stock gpu clocks with a 3.2GHz single core Opteron. That should be somewhere close to 3.0GHz FX60.
03-08-2006, 01:49 PM
Heretic

Quote:

Originally Posted by Marioace

but the card Box shows Albatron 7900GT 256MB
[took out images for quoting]
and is a 7900GTX
24PipeLines
CineFx 4.0 HDTV

WTH?

Same question...if the box and the benches have nothing to do with eachother, I request 7900gt benches :P.
03-08-2006, 02:01 PM
Gorod

Quote:

Originally Posted by metro.cl

i dont trust your scores you might have optimizations, we just have to wait and see 2 rigs with similar config and similar os

Come on guys - 12xxx with Default clocks on X1900XTX is easy :D
Heres my 12406 with 3.15GHz FX57 & Cat 6.2 ;) No LOD just Highest Perf. set in CCC

http://service.futuremark.com/compare?3dm05=1791723
03-08-2006, 02:08 PM
SIOUX

Quote:

Originally Posted by Gorod

Come on guys - 12xxx with Default clocks on X1900XTX is easy :D
Heres my 12406 with 3.15GHz FX57 & Cat 6.2 ;) No LOD just Highest Perf. set in CCC

http://service.futuremark.com/compare?3dm05=1791723

Ecactly:)
03-08-2006, 02:18 PM
nicepun

I guess this will have to come down to price, best bang for you bucks.
03-08-2006, 02:30 PM
PlatoonSgtElias

Quote:

Originally Posted by ahmad

You don't have an FX-60 at 3GHz now do you.

Thats very... unimpressive. I guess thats why these cards are going for so cheap. Hardly worth even considering :slap:

See this score below? Thats with a stock x1900XTX, no OS tweaks, and no driver tweaks. Drivers all default. On top of that, the opteron 170 is running at less than 2.7GHz. Imagine what I could do with a 3GHz FX :rolleyes:

Also, note the 12+ additional processes running in the background. Hardly what I would call tweaked.

DUDE!!!

I got 12,575p with STOCK X1900XTX and my Opteron single core@3200MHz watercooled!!!

http://www.zone.ee/wrc2006/1/X1900XTX_default.JPG?2
03-08-2006, 02:40 PM
kiwi

omg hard to decide, need more 7900 benchies. Was gonna buy 7900 (thought it'd be a bomb) but now I am so confused. I'd like to get one along with Yonah.

BTW, what brand xtx should I get in case I buy ati? I hope 800+ core on water but I see even some BBA can't do that. Haven't had high end ati for a while
03-08-2006, 02:51 PM
nicepun

Quote:

Originally Posted by kiwi

BTW, what brand xtx should I get in case I buy ati? I hope 800+ core on water but I see even some BBA can't do that. Haven't had high end ati for a while

Now you know this is hit or miss, regardless of brand. Unless some one else knows something I don't.
03-08-2006, 03:26 PM
_JP_

Quote:

Originally Posted by Gorod

Come on guys - 12xxx with Default clocks on X1900XTX is easy :D
Heres my 12406 with 3.15GHz FX57 & Cat 6.2 ;) No LOD just Highest Perf. set in CCC

http://service.futuremark.com/compare?3dm05=1791723

Try with REAL default...just like the drivers are when you install them.
The 7900 scores are with high quality in drivers, the default settings that came with drivers ;)
03-08-2006, 03:42 PM
PlatoonSgtElias

Quote:

Originally Posted by _JP_

Try with REAL default...just like the drivers are when you install them.
The 7900 scores are with high quality in drivers, the default settings that came with drivers ;)

My 12,575p was with default quality:rolleyes: ATI OWNS, really :S
03-08-2006, 03:46 PM
hicookie

Quote:

Originally Posted by PlatoonSgtElias

My 12,575p was with default quality:rolleyes: ATI OWNS, really :S

ja!maybe...who knows? maybe new driver and rivatuner comes out , nv will take it back!:stick:

Show 100 post(s) from this thread on one page