FX-57 with DI --> 4m06s

Printable View

Show 100 post(s) from this thread on one page

02-19-2006, 07:28 PM
s7e9h3n

Quote:

Originally Posted by Dani

Next time I'll try SP32M too, cant be difficult to go under 20m:cool:

I was thinking that too with my first run on my Opty 154, and wouldn't you know it, lol? :rolleyes: :

http://www.cryo-laboratory.com/uploa.../14x26432m.jpg
02-19-2006, 10:49 PM
Dani

Was that a good 32M run or bad run:p:
Ok, that's great info from where I gonna start (CPU GHz)
02-19-2006, 11:07 PM
s7e9h3n

Quote:

Originally Posted by Dani

Was that a good 32M run or bad run:p:
Ok, that's great info from where I gonna start (CPU GHz)

I'm not quite sure, but I thought it would be at least under 20min since I've completed 32m with my FX57 @ 14x262 in 20:04 :confused:
02-20-2006, 02:23 AM
Zebbo

Nice work Dani :toast:
02-20-2006, 02:50 AM
Pontus

Nice clocks and SPI time. :toast:
Good work Dani =)
02-21-2006, 08:21 AM
Dani

Ilkkahy's brazed container:
3570MHz IDLE
3570MHz LOAD

..did'nt remember to take photos of ~3.8GHz IDLE vs. LOAD temps:slap:
02-21-2006, 11:04 AM
Dani

..and here is some 1M running @ low CPU speed
I have apparently tested multi 14, did'nt remember that:confused: :p:

http://koti.mbnet.fi/dani69/DFI%20nF...1M_22.891s.gif
02-21-2006, 11:21 AM
TaPaKaH

HOW ? :slobber:
We have FX-57 @ 3.92 and it manages SuperPi1M only in 23s !!! :(
02-21-2006, 11:31 AM
Dani

Yes, I checked your SP1M time @3.91GHz, there is something upside down :wth:
SP1M @ 3.91GHz with 2*512mb @ 280FSB tight should give nice time around 20s. (if it is a error less run;) )
02-21-2006, 12:00 PM
s7e9h3n

Quote:

Originally Posted by TaPaKaH

HOW ? :slobber:
We have FX-57 @ 3.92 and it manages SuperPi1M only in 23s !!! :(

Yup, you guys are WAAAY off...something's wrong big time:

http://www.cryo-laboratory.com/uploa...4/14x2721m.jpg
02-21-2006, 12:05 PM
Gautam

Quote:

2x512MB OCZ EL PC4800DC Platinum @ 3.4V

Isn't that stuff TCCD or something? No way it could run 280 2-2-2...

And if that's a typo, 3.4v sounds very very low for BH5 at 280MHz...

2T, or otherwise very relaxed timings maybe?
02-21-2006, 12:08 PM
bachus_anonym

Good job clocking that FX, Dani :up: Do you have any good 32M for me, please? :D

Also, why do you guys keep using "your" version of SPi? What's up with that? Can't you bench what now most of SPi benchers use?
02-21-2006, 12:31 PM
s7e9h3n

Quote:

Originally Posted by Gautam

Isn't that stuff TCCD or something? No way it could run 280 2-2-2...

And if that's a typo, 3.4v sounds very very low for BH5 at 280MHz...

2T, or otherwise very relaxed timings maybe?

Wow...good call there Gautam...didn't even notice that....
02-21-2006, 12:51 PM
TaPaKaH

The actual DDR voltage was 3.5V.
About the chips: don`t know about `em myself (didn`t look unter the heatspreader...yet (don`t want to lose warranty because i`ve broken two kits of this mem already)).
Timings: 2-2-2-5 2T no performance modes whatsoever. It isn`t stable at these timings. (can hold no more than a couple of minutes then system freezes).
02-21-2006, 12:56 PM
Gautam

Looks like you have some derivative of BH5 in that case...and 2T and default timings would be the reason your pi score is so much higher than expected. Running pi at a very unstable speed never helps times either.
02-21-2006, 01:02 PM
TaPaKaH

Thanks guys !
Now i know why my SuperPi is so slow.
I would never thought that it is the DDR.
Going to order some more DDR... tomorrow.
But don`t know which manufacturer. I thought that OCZ PC4800 is the best.
Was wrong. Very wrong. Is GeIL ONE BH any good in OCing ? If it`s not, what is?
02-21-2006, 01:25 PM
Dani

Quote:

Originally Posted by bachus_anonym

Good job clocking that FX, Dani :up: Do you have any good 32M for me, please? :D

Also, why do you guys keep using "your" version of SPi? What's up with that? Can't you bench what now most of SPi benchers use?

Thanks BA!
"Our" version of SPi is the version we in Finland challenge in SPi, but should not be a problem to me to run SPimod 1.4:toast:
Will do that next time, 32M too:fact:

..but it will take a while, because I gonna test DI next time with solid container

http://koti.mbnet.fi/dani69/Kuparikipot/Kuparitanko.JPG

http://koti.mbnet.fi/dani69/Kupariki...paritanko1.JPG

Here is one of my container's, I noted it has 2.38" high solid bottom and 3" outer diagonal.
3mm thick wall and base thickness is around 10mm

Should it work "well" or better than brazed container:confused: :slobber:

http://koti.mbnet.fi/dani69/Kupariki...hja_sis%e4.JPG
http://koti.mbnet.fi/dani69/Kuparikipot/61mm_solid.JPG
02-21-2006, 03:30 PM
s7e9h3n

Quote:

Originally Posted by Gautam

Looks like you have some derivative of BH5 in that case...and 2T and default timings would be the reason your pi score is so much higher than expected. Running pi at a very unstable speed never helps times either.

It's TCCD, and no wonder he's already killed 2 kits already :D

Show 100 post(s) from this thread on one page