Nice results guys keep 'em coming! 5ghz vapochill is awsome :D
Printable View
Nice results guys keep 'em coming! 5ghz vapochill is awsome :D
Agreed ! I thought I was the only one who did'nt like 0606, too many reboots when pushed with O/C. 0519 my favourite untill I can get my hands on Cedarmill. :) then see what hapens ?Quote:
Originally Posted by FUGGER
Quote:
Originally Posted by dinos22
http://i28.photobucket.com/albums/c2...0mhzpi32mb.jpg
http://img367.imageshack.us/img367/5...00mhzpi5dz.jpg
Presler @ WC + 1.45v
P5WD2
XMS2 Pro
bios 0606
using that bios and 301 @ fsb = reboot 4 me.....Quote:
Originally Posted by FUGGER
Very nice, I want one but I can't afford it :(
I also edited the first post a little.
hum..not sure if this is only for the proggies mentioned, but ill post what i got :D
super pi to come..
http://img78.imageshack.us/img78/736...dmark014tb.jpg
http://img78.imageshack.us/img78/649...03214448ad.jpg
http://img78.imageshack.us/img78/378...k0597010fi.jpg
http://img78.imageshack.us/img78/1760/4400stable3js.jpg
http://img78.imageshack.us/img78/705...cmark058dg.jpg
well done NiCKE^ :toast:Quote:
Originally Posted by NiCKE^
Sticky!!!!
well doneQuote:
Originally Posted by PcCI2iminal
you need to push it more until you see one of the two cores failing......normally one is a weaker one.......looking forward to some more results from you and other blokes here......good results so far
I assume it's watercooling you use?Quote:
Originally Posted by d94
roger that :)Quote:
Originally Posted by NiCKE^
and here's my best superpi:
http://img413.imageshack.us/img413/8373/4606pi1uo.jpg
d94, is it stable there?
what mem timings u using and divider?
Cheers
unfortunatly not, if i want it to be stable @ 4.6 id have to run the cpu @ 1.65v which may kill it lolQuote:
Originally Posted by Byron
but from the route this chips goin im certain it would run..
4.1ghz 1.3v
4.2ghz 1.35v
4.3ghz 1.4v
4.4ghz 1.45v
those are all stable speeds
that screeni of prime was @ 1.45v
sexeh :cool:
mem timings/divider?
humm 5-4-4-15 1:1Quote:
Originally Posted by Byron
a buddy of mine is tellin me to go 1.5v and see if my oc still goes up :D
should i do it? i'd like to get some re-assurance before i try and end up frying my chip lol
i cannot assure you as i dont own one, but i recon 0.2v above stock on water for these would be the maximum for 24/7 as i've seen some others running 1.45 on air.
Sentential:
4,1Ghz SuperPi 1m = 27 sek.
PcCI2iminal:
4,5Ghz SuperPi 1m = 29,2 sek.
D94:
4,6Ghz SuperPi 1m = 28,5 sek.
why's that? i dont understand this...lol
am i stupid or why is 4,1Ghz faster than 4,6???
btw.
are those presslers getting so hot@1,5V?? i thought
because of the 65nm they would be colder:confused:
my cpu is now stable @ 1.5v 4.5ghz..this speed however will only be used for benchies, 4.4 1.45v is my 24/7 speed hehe
http://img232.imageshack.us/img232/6...0stable9bh.jpg
http://img238.imageshack.us/img238/653/yippi2iq.jpg
http://img238.imageshack.us/img238/653/yippi2iq.jpg
still default vapo ls....will be modded in this month, then the real fun begins ;)
d94 those are some very pretty numbers. If I ever had a doubt you just wiped it away... Thanks for the posting. It didn't take you 20 pages to show what it could do!!
WZ
I wonder about the high fsb for the smallest 920. I tried 2 930 ES with my brother and both are not able to go stable over 300MHz fsb, even for benching.
So it´s good to see that the newer retail chips will clock better than earlier samples.
really nice there d94 . what cooling u using . i should be getting my 940 on monday . best 920 ive seen so far . keep em comming .
Sen was using the standard version. If he was using 1.4 mod anti-cheat, it would be around 30.xx depending on his mem.Quote:
Sentential:
4,1Ghz SuperPi 1m = 27 sek.
PcCI2iminal:
4,5Ghz SuperPi 1m = 29,2 sek.
D94:
4,6Ghz SuperPi 1m = 28,5 sek.
OK, I'll put mine up, but they are nothing special. Presler 930/x1600XTs/Mushkin XP6400. Sorry, no suicide shots, but I've seen only 4.8GHz (1.50Vc max) on phase anyway :( d94 is kicking my ass on that one, but my PCMark04 rocks anyway :) 661 will be here tomorrow, so these are likely all you'll see of Presler benches from me.
http://i10.photobucket.com/albums/a1...o/930/pc05.gif
http://i10.photobucket.com/albums/a1...o/930/pc04.gif
http://i10.photobucket.com/albums/a1...0fsb-600cf.gif
http://i10.photobucket.com/albums/a1...-290fsb-cf.gif
http://i10.photobucket.com/albums/a1.../930/spi1m.gif
Quote:
Originally Posted by dinos22
thats my best result ,1 core failed @ Pi32mb @ 6 loop and 4.330mhz @ 1.45v and no help with more vcore ,i will try older bios to push the fsb to run Pi1mb
d94
nice chip u got there and great job
d94, Nice scores and I don't like putting a damper on your triumphs but you and everybody else who is running Preslers or Cedar Mills with Asus mobos should check out this thread:Quote:
Originally Posted by d94
http://www.xtremesystems.org/forums/...&postcount=121
Discussion in there about Asus PLL bugs going "out of order" to give false results in this benchy PCMark05.
An example would be my lowly 630 achieving this score in PCMark05:
http://service.futuremark.com/compare?pcm05=133909
7351 from only air cooled 630 @ 14 x 293mhz FSB & X800 XT at stock ! remember this is only with a single core cpu !
You fellas be the judge, just thought the above links might be interesting. Personally if I were you guys, run the PCMark05 tests a few times and then see if you get approximately the same score. :)
interesting stuffs, but i got about 7500..so id be fairly sure i dondt have the bug :)