65nm presler 950es oc test on rad watercooling, 4.9G done !

Printable View

Show 100 post(s) from this thread on one page

11-26-2005, 12:35 PM
gloatlizard

victor great job, a very interesting topic my friend
11-26-2005, 01:23 PM
kappa2001

now i'm interested :D

get on to game benchmarks ;)

good job :thumbsup:
11-26-2005, 02:26 PM
[cTx]Philosophy

I wanna see some 3d action
Whats ur 24\7 clocks looking @?
Or are you still figuring it out?
11-26-2005, 05:13 PM
PcCI2iminal

nice chip u got there and great job
Intel @ 65nm is the way to go

and im with the others 3dbenchs with norton runnin,need some real dual core power
:toast:
11-26-2005, 05:59 PM
iboomalot

Quote:

Originally Posted by 187(V)URD@

I'll wait for benches before saying that :stick:

going off the slight improvements by these benches I don't think AMD has much to worry about.

http://www.tomshardware.com/cpu/20051010/

Quote:

Originally Posted by anandtech

Barring a miracle, the new Presler chips would need to have some new feature not listed on the roadmap to really make them outshine the existing Smithfield and Athlon 64 X2 chips. The smaller process might allow them to run slightly cooler, and we might even see 4.0GHz chips at some point, but that's about the only changes

would be nice to see Intel get over that 4ghz hump they have been avoiding for awhile
11-26-2005, 06:08 PM
Piotrsama

Quote:

Originally Posted by afireinside

3 cores? :woot:

:confused:

Presler is dual core...

Quote:

Originally Posted by don_vercetti

run PCMARK!!! with three cores, it should ace that.

Same, 2 cores.

Where did you get the 3 cores stuff from?
11-26-2005, 06:16 PM
VictorWang

Quote:

Originally Posted by k|ngp|n

Great stuff victor...these chips look strong. :toast:

65nm is really good !
11-26-2005, 06:17 PM
VictorWang

Quote:

Originally Posted by gloatlizard

victor great job, a very interesting topic my friend

aha~~~~~you can hit over 7.5Ghz with 65nm core soon , my friend :toast:
11-27-2005, 12:05 AM
don_vercetti

Quote:

Originally Posted by Piotrsama

:confused:

Presler is dual core...

Same, 2 cores.

Where did you get the 3 cores stuff from?

From afireinside......sorry. Also, if you look in the second picture of the first post, he has run 3 instances of SuperPI. In retrospect, it was probably demonstrating that it had HT. My bad.
11-27-2005, 12:27 AM
Xassius

Why not lower that divider to 1:1 for some 3-2-2-1 timing action! :D
11-27-2005, 12:38 AM
LexDiamonds

Nice clocks to be sure...

AMD is in no real trouble..

It makes me smile to see Opties@3ghz just spanking a 4.6Ghz next genP4 core at Super Pi. Granted SPi isnt the be all end all, but its a good indication of general performance.
11-27-2005, 01:06 AM
VictorWang

Quote:

Originally Posted by Xassius

Why not lower that divider to 1:1 for some 3-2-2-1 timing action! :D

I've test for 3-2-2-4 333mhz vs 5-3-3-8 500mhz, seems the latter runs faster :clap:
11-27-2005, 01:33 AM
IluvIntel

VictorWang, what bios version are you using on P5WD2 ?
11-27-2005, 01:52 AM
VictorWang

Quote:

Originally Posted by IluvIntel

VictorWang, what bios version are you using on P5WD2 ?

0606 ;)
11-27-2005, 02:59 AM
RoyaL

Quote:

Originally Posted by iboomalot

going off the slight improvements by these benches I don't think AMD has much to worry about.

http://www.tomshardware.com/cpu/20051010/

well I think AMD is in big trouble.
obviously with this new 0,065 chips Intel cpus will go even higher
going over 7.5ghz@1M getting 16" or 15" who knows :)
FX is stucked at 21" .. that's a shame :)

Victor:put some dry ice on that baby!
11-27-2005, 03:38 AM
VictorWang

Quote:

Originally Posted by RoyaL

well I think AMD is in big trouble.
obviously with this new 0,065 chips Intel cpus will go even higher
going over 7.5ghz@1M getting 16" or 15" who knows :)
FX is stucked at 21" .. that's a shame :)

Victor:put some dry ice on that baby!

:banana: I think... 65nm single core can hit over 8.5Ghz for 1m benching :clap:
11-27-2005, 04:08 AM
perry_78

Quote:

Originally Posted by VictorWang

:banana: I think... 65nm single core can hit over 8.5Ghz for 1m benching :clap:

If that would indeed be the case I think I better fire up them old DI containers and start saving ;)
11-27-2005, 04:39 AM
Master_G

Quote:

Originally Posted by Supertim0r

they run colder than the prescott ?
nice stuff :cool:

If they didnt i think Intel should pretty much give up and go home tbh lol.
What waterblock is being used?
Nice results, should be interesting in 06, might have to start paying attention to intel again!

G
11-27-2005, 04:51 AM
VictorWang

Quote:

Originally Posted by perry_78

If that would indeed be the case I think I better fire up them old DI containers and start saving ;)

I thinks LN2 is much preffered :woot:
11-27-2005, 04:52 AM
VictorWang

Quote:

Originally Posted by Master_G

If they didnt i think Intel should pretty much give up and go home tbh lol.
What waterblock is being used?
Nice results, should be interesting in 06, might have to start paying attention to intel again!

G

very common waterblock with 12*12cm rad and 1225 1700rpm fan :p:
room temp = 22c
11-27-2005, 05:11 AM
shuRe

thank god your using water with that, i dont even want to think about the temps on air.

IMO AMD arnt in any real trouble, im willing to bet money on it :eek:
11-27-2005, 05:12 AM
crotale

I thought they didn't work on 955X boards. Very interesting! :cool:
11-27-2005, 06:37 AM
iboomalot

8.5 ghz i doubt thats going to happen even on LN2

Yes Intel on LN2 does a great superpi run but I use mine to game with and encode DVDs

Intel won't be winning much on the gaming front until a better design of the CPU happens.

PCMark05 Users Top 10

1. 8513 DINOS-MIKE GREECE -- AMD

2. 8456 Maverick -- AMD

3. 8165 by D. Karetsos) - Intel

4. 7928 Skywaver -- AMD

5. 7800 hyperasus - Intel

6. 7689 eva2000 -- AMD

7. 7678 *XtremeSystems 3D Team* -- AMD

8. 7653 TuKo - AMD

9. 7614 BigStan -- Intel

10. 7465 ElDuderino -- AMD

PCMark04 Users Top 10

1. 10089 OPB Taiwan -- AMD

2. 9518 Sucka -- AMD

3. 9364 Sampsa & Kamu – AMD

4. 9326 FUGGER -- Intel

5. 9298 FROG -- AMD

6. 9158 maverik -- AMD

7. 9123 Project Octane -- AMD

8. 9078 by D. Karetsos) - Intel

9. 8878 Fletch -- AMD

10. 8821 Iboomalot XS -- AMD

3DMark05 Users Top 20

ALL --AMD

3DMark03 Users Top 20

ALL -- AMD

Intel a threath hummm don't think so

atleast they are improving there products competition is good :D
11-27-2005, 06:47 AM
The Stilt

Quote:

Originally Posted by VictorWang

:banana: I think... 65nm single core can hit over 8.5Ghz for 1m benching :clap:

You might be able to get a Cedar Mill running at 8.5GHz speed (which I doubt), but Intel isn´t going to release a chipset anytime soon that can hit ~450MHz FSB with desent memory speed and timings. 975X isn´t going to bring much difference compared to 955X.
11-27-2005, 06:47 AM
VictorWang

Quote:

Originally Posted by iboomalot

8.5 ghz i doubt thats going to happen even on LN2

Yes Intel on LN2 does a great superpi run but I use mine to game with and encode DVDs

Intel won't be winning much on the gaming front until a better design of the CPU happens.
ALL -- AMD

Intel a threath hummm don't think so

atleast they are improving there products competition is good :D

when yonah comes.........AMD maybe lost in all the game ;)

PCMark05, 4.2G 955xe easily got a score=7377 cpu score :p:

http://www.ocparty.com.cn/uploads/po...1133096431.jpg

Show 100 post(s) from this thread on one page