65nm Pentium D 950 with 4MB L2

Printable View

Show 100 post(s) from this thread on one page

11-07-2005, 02:46 PM
n00b 0f l337

WOOT! WOOT! YES!
*bow*

I can't wait.... I so can't wait....
People you have no idea how happy i am.
11-07-2005, 04:26 PM
16floz470ml

I bet this chip could run like at least 4 video cards with no bottle neck :slobber:
11-07-2005, 04:47 PM
vanovich

cmon dude test the mother .
11-07-2005, 09:23 PM
railer

yea should be intresting results. But what i'm realy waiting for is merom and conroe. Those have new tech. But who knows what this litle monster cpu can do. We will wait for you hicookie, complete your training soon. I hope i will like the results as much as i like the chick with a sword on your avatar ;)
11-07-2005, 09:30 PM
Welz

this is gonna be sweet!!
:banana: :banana: :banana: :banana: :banana: :banana:
11-07-2005, 11:50 PM
Kjaks

Quote:

Originally Posted by 16floz470ml

I bet this chip could run like at least 4 video cards with no bottle neck :slobber:

yep, but then there would be no power left to calculate physics
11-07-2005, 11:53 PM
Kjaks

Quote:

Originally Posted by hicookie

Kjaks< i'll prepare liquid nitrogen if it's needed, and forget the coldbug.

soo, its got a cold bug? I didn't know that.. :confused:
11-08-2005, 12:03 AM
Aphex_Tom_9

whoa! 65nm already? I JUST GOT a 90nm chip! oy, behind the times.... lol
11-08-2005, 12:25 AM
Martijn

I want one :slobber: :D
11-08-2005, 01:19 AM
LarsK

Quote:

Originally Posted by Martijn

I want one :slobber: :D

We all do..... :D
11-08-2005, 05:42 AM
Xassius

Nice job acquiring one :D
11-08-2005, 07:25 AM
[KoG]^weaZel

Quote:

Originally Posted by Martijn

I want one :slobber: :D

Put me down for two or three. :slobber:
11-13-2005, 03:35 PM
Mesce

Quote:

Originally Posted by Kadaj

presler is the single core 65nm processor, Cedar Mill is the Dual core 65nm processor.

Presler is dual core Cedar Mill is single core both 65nm. Cedar Mill is 2mb cache and Presler is 4mb Cache (2 per core)
11-13-2005, 03:45 PM
zir_blazer

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mesce

Presler is dual core Cedar Mill is single core both 65nm. Cedar Mill is 2mb cache and Presler is 4mb Cache (2 per core)

Actually, Presler isn't Dual Core, is MCM. It got two Cedar Mill Cores on the same Package but they aren't physically in the same piece of silicon like Smithfield, Manchester or Toledo.
11-13-2005, 07:05 PM
PkG.1337

i hope intel dont dissapoint me again
11-13-2005, 08:58 PM
metro.cl

bench it!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
11-14-2005, 08:43 AM
speed bump

Come one you have go to be back by know so you can bech his sucker.
11-14-2005, 09:09 AM
Kadaj

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mesce

Presler is dual core Cedar Mill is single core both 65nm. Cedar Mill is 2mb cache and Presler is 4mb Cache (2 per core)

I suppose I got the two mixed up, thank-you.

Quote:

Actually, Presler isn't Dual Core, is MCM. It got two Cedar Mill Cores on the same Package but they aren't physically in the same piece of silicon like Smithfield, Manchester or Toledo.

if that's not attention to minor details idk what is. Where in his post was he refering to how Presler is packaged? Dual is synomus with 2, not " two execution cores pacakged on the same piece of silicon "
11-14-2005, 09:54 AM
Kitaps

I want see benchmark results :slobber: I think 65nm will be good...
11-14-2005, 10:49 AM
Kadaj

Quote:

Originally Posted by Kitaps

I want see benchmark results :slobber: I think 65nm will be good...

you shouldn't expect gold out of lead, Presler and Cedar Mill perform no better than Prescott and Smithfield, all the 65nm process serves is to decrease power consumption and TDP. They do overclock slightly better however than the 90nm counterparts, iirc, according to a preview I saw average overclock of a Cedar Mill was in the 4.3-4.5ghz range and on a Presler in the 3.9-4ghz range on stock Intel heatsinks.
11-14-2005, 11:31 AM
Nosfer@tu

Quote:

Originally Posted by PkG.1337

i hope intel dont dissapoint me again

How did they leet you down :p??
11-14-2005, 09:42 PM
PkG.1337

Quote:

Originally Posted by Nosfer@tu

How did they leet you down :p??

pentium D's design could be a lot better if intel didnt rush the design and production :rolleyes:
11-15-2005, 08:09 AM
Kadaj

Quote:

Originally Posted by PkG.1337

pentium D's design could be a lot better if intel didnt rush the design and production :rolleyes:

it wasent rushed, it is as possibly good as they could achieve without any major chipset re-designs.
11-15-2005, 09:13 AM
Vapor

It was rushed, they said it themselves.....this still isn't ideal but should certainly turn out better yields at the high end.

This certainly is one beast if it doesn't have a problem with the cold (it shouldn't--no on-die mem controller).
11-15-2005, 09:44 AM
Kadaj

Quote:

Originally Posted by Vapor

It was rushed, they said it themselves.....this still isn't ideal but should certainly turn out better yields at the high end.

This certainly is one beast if it doesn't have a problem with the cold (it shouldn't--no on-die mem controller).

nine months isn't exactly years of development, but it's not something they just threw together(now, I will admit, they did say they rushed it, however I think this to be a tad over-exaggeration). There were special on-die thermal diodes, and Over head management components that needed to be added, they even orginaly wanted to use indpendent busses for each core, however that now won't appear until paxville. I don't think the cold will be a problem, presler isn't widly different from Smithfield, it uses the packaging system that they orginaly prefered in smithfield, but were unable to integrate because of time contraints.

Show 100 post(s) from this thread on one page