Quote:
Originally Posted by Vapor
Your not good enough LOL
Printable View
Quote:
Originally Posted by Vapor
Your not good enough LOL
and I was hoping for it to suck my [censored]Quote:
Originally Posted by Vapor
seriously dude, don't you dream of the perfect overclocking chip?
Actually, I tend to dream about what is going to happen the next day.....life's kinda DejaVu everyday for me.Quote:
Originally Posted by nn_step
Back to the chip, it's still very impressive--dual cores can use the bandwidth, IMO.
Ego was a typo :p:Quote:
Originally Posted by Pinnacle
Do you thing it will come out with quad core options right out of the gate?
Ummmm, I suppose it should....no reason for it not to, IMO.Quote:
Originally Posted by nn_step
I think we will see prices going down sooner then later, AMD has had a major fan following becoz of this in first place. Secondly they will be having their second Fab rolling wafers soon. If Intel does not have a good chip on their hands I think we will see current scenario repeating. But if Intel have a good one then Amd has to offer prices just a bit lower then Intel's part to keep its chip selling well.
I don't think prices will go down....they don't need to lower prices.
You dream about computer parts? Whats wrong with you :slap:Quote:
Originally Posted by nn_step
Its all about the :banana::banana::banana::banana::banana: Cat LOL
Well why dream about girls when you have a sexy one in the bed next to you?Quote:
Originally Posted by Pinnacle
Guys, guys.....just because you have to inflate them quite a bit just to become useful in bed doesn't mean they're real....sheesh :D
I very much doubt that. Just look at the size of the dual core dies, a quad core would be insanely huge and thus expensive. No quad cores before switching to 65 nm imho.Quote:
Originally Posted by nn_step
Yes and I can 100% confirm that for you. Micron has stopped production of the *entire* D9 series :shakes: The only decent stuff left makes 4-4-4-10 look like low-latencyQuote:
Originally Posted by Vapor
Now why's that? The same as with old BH-5 saga?Quote:
Originally Posted by Sentential
me want... me want...
Me to, disapointing. Surely we all know mhz is king for A64's, X2's, FX's, and i suspect M2's as well. Is DDR-2 support really worth it, with other tinys optimizations?Quote:
Originally Posted by Pinnacle
I have no idea what your talking about dude...Quote:
Originally Posted by Bloody_Sorcerer
how did you go from saying cas latency of DDR2 is too slow, in which I pretty much said thats not true... now your talking about the cold bug of some CPU's... which has nothing to do with DDR2 latencies... :confused:
Bloody_Sorcerer: do you think that AMD 65nm's CPU won't have cold bug because of being made by proper factory?
How should we know?
No way to know without testing a few chips...Quote:
Originally Posted by Ref
lol is all I can say to you bloody.. lol.. that statment you made has no basis in fact..
There are several reasons for the cold bug, but that isnt one of them.. most of them have to do with the funy way the mem controller works...
I bet independent voltage control of the mem controller could likely help that out? maybe?
i think so vapor if there is a way to heat the mem controller a beat it should over ride the cold bug
No idea. :(Quote:
Originally Posted by mrlobber
Exactally. What he is refering to was a conversation I had with him discussing why 90nm yeilds were so poor. However that isnt going to be the case for too much longer as Dresden has been re-tooled if I remember rightQuote:
Originally Posted by MaxxxRacer