7016 ha? Interesting
Printable View
7016 ha? Interesting
my 7800gt gets 6850 points on a sanny 4000+. in fact that the fx-55 is slighlty faster than my (not overclocked) 4000+ i think the 7800gt scores around 6900 points on a fx-55. the difference isnt that much, imo.Quote:
Originally Posted by Karma
expected more performance from the r520... :/
So did I. Not reason to upgrade at all to the r520Quote:
expected more performance from the r520... :/
I'm not going to comment till some real benchers get it... Doesn't look good so far though :(
I'm not going to comment on a card I don't care about :D
X1800XT is what I'm waiting for.
This is dragging on for too long, and ever round makes me look forward to the release less and less tbh.
As always, i reservse judgement, but these numbers are noted and the anticipation level is adjusted accordingly.
G
200 mhz would be more than 50 points in 05 for the CPU. They're also running their memory at 2-2-2-5, which between cpu clockspeed and that could easily account for the difference. There's other factors too obviously that you must remember, but those two alone could make the difference.Quote:
Originally Posted by RaZz!
Either way, this does fit right along with what Sanders results were, with it being slightly edged out by the 7800gt... Makes ya wonder, don't it?
Why oh why do you believe this, can't you wait silly 7 days.
Frisch, this time these are real numbers.Quote:
Originally Posted by Frisch
{ part 2, wrong place }
And I still wonder what people were expecting...
the X850XTs CF beating the 7800GTX SLI ?
{ whatever, I decided to leave it here }
X1800XL being about equal to the 7800GT...not bad. X1800XT would then probably be about equal with the 7800GTX. But we'll find out soon enough, just a little while longer. :)
Am I the only one who sees the 7k score for the XL, looks at scores in the high 6000, low 700's with air-OC'ed X850XTPE's and wonders just what all has changed besides the clocks?
In theory if the pipes were more efficent wouldn't the score the substantially high at the same clocks rather than the same ballpark?
I think there are more vertex shaders....LOL
Quote:
Originally Posted by Arkangyl
Ya, also what Ive been pondering myself. But it looks like another chip by ATI on Steroids. Just a 16 pipe card with very high clocks. We ve seen all this talk about the pipes being 1.33 times bigger, but I just dont see it being so.
We can only wait for the official realase. Cuz all these rumors suck ;)
Im the same wait for the release before speculation begins, who knows after a driver update the performance should be a bit closer imo..
Wow these threads are really amusing to read...speculation is running wild.
All I will tell you is that I don't trust any of these preview sites. The truth will be out soon enough.
Does it score 7017 or something?! :D
I want to believe....Quote:
Originally Posted by Grayskull
Thanks Grayskull, I'll buy you a beer one day
Eh gray, I bet at this point you're hating trying to run damage control...
Of course, HKPEC has leaked SEVERAL items during the NDA period, and has never lied about any of them yet. Infact, they even show a picture of the x1800xl in the mobo, attached to the monitor, RUNNING 3dmark05! I don't think we need any more proof than that, now do we?
Also grayskull, going by your comments, YOU don't even know what the x1800's can do, considering you said you don't trust these sites. I *would* think an ATi employee would *EASILY* know if someone was lying, but you seem to not be so sure judging by your comments... So did they not tell you anything or what?
Don't be such a n00b DilTech, the guy works for ATI he can't go around spilling the beans and keep his job. Goading him (Grayskull) is just plain rude.
You are days away from launch. Eveyone will get factual reviews then, for better or for worse.
That is kinda like, well i tie you up, you can't say a word, and then i throw a lot of s... in your head.Quote:
Originally Posted by DilTech
It' reminds me of Monthy Python
in the review the guy also says the final x1800xl should be 5% to 15% faster, and thats not because of drivers he says that the final x1800xl has more power
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ugly n Grey
Ugly, you take my comments the wrong way man...
You see, when you say "I wouldn't trust these preview sites" that makes it seem like he himself doesn't know. Now, he could simply say it's BS, therefore not giving us any info but saying the benchmark score is fake.
Quick and simple, that's not goading him or telling him to spill the beans, nor is it being rude. I was simply pointing out that, going by his statement, they haven't told him anything. There's a few ATi employee's on other forums who haven't been told anything on the R520 at all, so it wouldn't surprise me if they hadn't told him.
Sorry if you misinterpeted what I said, unfortunately it seems to be a common happening on the internet these days.
In that case I apologize DilTech but you gotta understand that saying anything yay or nay about the scores by an ATI employee would result in the statement being sent around the world as gospel in a day :) That also is a fact of life these days. Again, sorry if there was miscommunication,
i like pizza