Ummm... It will be sad when A64's catch Prescotts in clockspeed. :P
Printable View
Ummm... It will be sad when A64's catch Prescotts in clockspeed. :P
? explain to me as well.. ?
OK, WWM, with all due respect, how do you tell the difference between your cpu and my "FX57" ;) :
http://img167.echo.cx/img167/4749/579ob.jpg
http://img285.echo.cx/img285/2503/cp...ated3205tn.jpg
BTW, disregard the fact that it says fx-25. If I use a more current bios (i.e. 510-3) CPU-Z will recognize it as a FX57.
I have no idea why some people just don’t wanna believe the truth..
It’s just a new CPU testing and I am glad that I have a chance to share with friends here.
I start wondering should I share my next E6 version report; someone at this site just get on my nerve.
You don’t believe your eyes or AMD’s quality?
3G test
200X15 DDR400 2 2-2-5
PI 8M 5m20s
CPUMARK 386
300X10 DDR500 2 2-2-5
PI 8M 5m20s
CPUMARK 389
http://img102.echo.cx/img102/8629/3g24ot.jpg
judging by the marking s on the cpu and your reputation so im not doubting you at all. I always love reading your threads.
gotta go will comment more later.
Hun.. i see AMD at Intel speed very soom... damn that getting too fast.. just thinking that my first computer was a p100 with 16mb edoram and it was the fastest around my neighborhoud... and know i see people with 3000 and 1g+ of ram... just thinking what application for normal purpouse will botteneck this fx57 of yours... im mean will longhorn be so performance hungry??? Ok doom3 and other will love this power... and that´s the public for the fx... but this speed will be avaible for costumers in general ... but what will be the user for that at home/office???
I think that my sempron 2.2+ its already too much power, soon ill probably be seing price range CPU at 2.5 minimum specs... dan... crazy world...
but... I WANT ONE OF THOSE... JUST TO SEE HOW FAR MY VOODOO3 WOULD GO AT 3DMARK2001 EHHEEH :banana:
And congratulation´s on your cpu... :clap:
Well to me the picture of the processor looks fake.
I think the only way to tell if this is real or not is to take a picture of it in your hand. Why mark out the week? I could really care about your serial number too lol
i dont really get it
Lets see multiple pics of the cpu and maybe a movie of the actual bench running. I mean im not trying to be a Ahole but to really get everyone off your back you should do this. I mean come on , you seem like a big time AMD rep or person getting ahold of these cpus before anyone else. So why dont you do yourself a favor and go buy a digital camara for 200 bucks and make a movie. This should be pocket change for you anyway tight? Your a big time AMD rep tester???? Or are you just a janitor that works at amd ?
Lets see a movie that shows a live bench or a CPU Z
This reminds me of those Area 51 websites and alien crap.
LOL
lets not get the old intel "faster is better" yea its better comparing 2 of the same breed speed for speed
but can we see if there is any clock for clock improvment?
if the cpu isn't real, at least i want his RAM ... 3.18v 250 2-2-2-5 Spi 8M seems good :) , Redlines ?
WWM, mmaybe cpuz validation for a start ;)
fake or not, that is not the main issue for me anyway .
the fx-57 soon will be available, and that for sure :toast:
His RAM is more than likely Gskill GH and he already has shown a cpuzvalidation ;) . Hey WWM, I'm not trying to argue with you, it's just that I just want to compare "notes". If your 57 is the "real deal" I just wanted to see if there were any differences in cpuids with my cpu compared to yours.Quote:
Originally Posted by setyotomo
@WWM
Thanks for sharing some screenies of this new FX-57 chip :) I understand the reason behind covering SERIAL NUMBER, but why also WEEK and packaging info (WAFER's part) ???
as with sites like genmay, if a chick posts a pick of herself no one believes it, so someone tends to say, write " blah blah blah, etc," on a piece of paper and take a pic of the person with paper with think writen on it. so someone says to someone on xtreme, take pic of cpu with something saying, jesus is a sucker, or whatever. simply way to prove where pic came from.
i belive windwithme, he's had excellent sneak previews in the past i doubt he would lie and ruin his credibility, good job wind
Jeez...Quote:
Originally Posted by windwithme
well it isnt like its that much of an OC in this case (not that its not an insane CPU, but anything that can't OC that much on air is a dud)Quote:
Originally Posted by Sentential
I beleive u windwithme. Now, get that crunching 24/7. What is the dbench on that system. Try 200*15 and 300*10.
Apparently these chips don't need extensive (and expensive) cooling sollutions to break 20sec 1mb SP.
... then again this is Xtreme Systems. :D
Quote:
Originally Posted by furyfax
I really don't get you people. So what if it's a "fake" fx-57 ? It's not like he murdered someone.
Heh...really don`t understand what`s all the fuzz about ??? Just some nice SD core under remarked heatspreader (I don`t mean it`s fake:heatspreaders are the same-marking different :) ). Of course 2.8GHZ on stock voltage is great. But haven`t you seen SD doing that ???
I'm not saying he BS'ed us, but even if he did ... what's the big deal ? I don't regard the fx-57 as a major step forward anyways :) (DC's are another story)
Camera Make: PENTAX Corporation
Camera Model: PENTAX Optio 550
Image Date: 2005:06:16 22:36:11
Flash Used: Yes (Manual)
Focal Length: 20.4mm (35mm equivalent: 98mm)
Exposure Time: 0.015 s (1/67)
Aperture: f/3.8
White Balance: Auto
Metering Mode: Matrix
WWM digicamera :D
So those white blocks were part of the original "photo" too? ;)Quote:
Originally Posted by Dani
YOu guys kill me :ROTF:
ASS: Hairy
CRACK: wide clean
HEMEROIDS: none
CARE FACTOR: zero