Printable View
So.. they are running 4 apps at the same time? But.. the 4800+ is only dual core.. while the 840 EE is dual core and has Hyper threading.... To me it sounds like this test was set up biased towards intel to begin with...
It's just like comparing a single core A64 vs a P4 with HT running 2 threads of something.
I don't think the A64 likes this test, and who will ever run 4 cpu demanding tasks at the same time? How about they just run farcry and Divx only.. see who wins DivX then!
better they show amd dual core is far better than intel dual core even with 4 intensive cpu usage programs
ok this is wierd. yesterday when i looked it said AMD had one reboot and intel 2. now it says AMD has 0 reboots? wtf is up with that. anyone got any idea.
its from when it first started, it was a reboot and it got counted for both, ive been watching since the beggining.Quote:
Originally Posted by MaxxxRacer
oh ok. gotcha.. i thought it was pretty wierd especially when i looked at the readouts and they all looked good with no hitchesl ike the intel rig.
Well I don't really think it matters that the intel rig is a bit faster at the decoding, with all the crashed i'm sure the amd has caught up. I rather have a 1% slower system then a intelcrashalot system.
Crashed again ... iNTEL is down ...
now thier claiming 1 reboot for intel?
and online, with a blue screen?
what the hell?
should be #4 right ? They'll probably fix it ...
:rofl: Funny stuff :D
On a serious note... I can find no write-up on how/where they are instrumenting the systems... surely they aren't using the MB monitoring :stick:
gotta love their numbering system for number of downtimes... when from 3 to 1... magical isnt it!
I know DualCore and SLi is heavy stuff, but a 25min bootup ? C'mon ... ;)
To half-quote HELLFiRE: "if your X2 is still running after 86 h and 9 min, ya ain't well overclocked yet ..." :banana:
intel is still blue screened, 40 min boot up?
hmm, is it just me or are the "live charts" not so live ?
EDiT: seems like just the DiVX test is the one that's not moving ... :stick:
I hope so, for intel's sake at least, or maybe it fried another mobo. :D
it looks like they are on the desktop with the intel machine but not doing anythign with it.
at least it'll stay up that way. :D
Maybe they are trying little blue pills on that Intel setup now :p:Quote:
Originally Posted by fatfreepork
Intel blue screen of death is on but the system is online?
Intel crash counter was 3 now it is 1?
Clearly the power supply is 200W less than it used to be, perhaps ths video cards are fried?
What the hell is going on at tom hardware?
Kobe Tai is such a sexy Asian hottie!
This is fun to watch, probably not as much fun for intel and there fanboys tho...
O well :D im having fun.
both are @ desktop as of now.
has anyone noticed, the temps for the amd are kina ... high compared to usual amd's, but i guess they are running under stress, but none the less, im pretty sure those are still a lil high for amd
Why is the Intel 24 hour overview showing an entirely different time frame from the AMD one? ( I see 1 - 7 AM for AMD and 5 - 11pm for Intel at this point in time)? With the AMD one seemingly correct going by German time zone.
Also the one week overview for Intel has no temperature measurement whereas the AMD one has a clear red line starting 3rd June?
The other thing the camshot of the Intel at the moment seems to shows the fan over the cpu as stationery suggesting the system is down? Could just be the way I am looking at the picture though.
Hahaha... Intel seems to have a problem eh ? :D . 4 hours uptime for Intel and 90 hours for AMD...lol