OCZ PC5000 back in October 2004...
Printable View
Perhaps few selected TCC5 (and just because TCCD are finished) because actually I don't think TCC5 can perform like that in general.Quote:
Originally Posted by xgman
Watch your tone mate!Quote:
Originally Posted by Punisher!
I was told by OCZ it was TCC5 so do with that info as you please....
i'm suprised an OCZ rep hasnt been on yet to confirm / deny this
They are Samsung, period. Everyone from Ryan on down at OCZ has told me this.
When you order 4800 or 5000 you get either all TCC5 (latest die/rev) or All TCCD (latest die/rev) TCCD ic's are spec'ed to ddr500 where TCC5 ic's are spec'ed to 466 theoretically, but as OCZ tests and bins the ic's, they are finding that a good percentage of each make the cut. The yields are improving. I wouldn't be surprised if they both come off the same run at Samsung and are just marked arbitrarily. Bottom line is that once they are put on a stick of ram, they are all the same ic as they would be also in dual packs. They don't mix tcc5 and tccd on the same set.
I already reviewed TCC5 (although I cant link to the review....), they were on normal PCB and were pratically as good as TCCD on BP.... I have three pairs of TCC5 BTW;).
all 5 as good?
I'm really looking forward to seeing how these sticks do, OCZ's high-end offerings are almost always something to write home about ;).
OCZ has so many stages of binned TCCx right now, that this stuff is likely to be the cream of the cream of the cream. Should be very good stuff paired with a good processor (or rather, a good memory controller).
They were pretty much within 3MHz +/-... So they were not varying much compared to all other RAM's I tested (thats a lot;) :p: )
TCCD comes and goes, i told you all this weeks ago. TCC5 is just as good as long as its binned properly.
We use both and yes the 5000 could be TCC5.