me too.Quote:
Originally Posted by eva2000
and I can't use Trtw=1 on dfi also.
HARDCORECLOCKER, try adjust your bypass max, async latensy and preamble- this may help lowering latensy.
I get 32,8nsec at 276x10 on winchester with Neo2 and bh5.screen
Printable View
me too.Quote:
Originally Posted by eva2000
and I can't use Trtw=1 on dfi also.
HARDCORECLOCKER, try adjust your bypass max, async latensy and preamble- this may help lowering latensy.
I get 32,8nsec at 276x10 on winchester with Neo2 and bh5.screen
nice, bet your glad to finally get your board ? :D
:D I did, take a look at the fist post - think it's the best setting for BH-5.Quote:
Originally Posted by Jaan
Runs also fine with 4,5 ns read preamble but it's the same performance as 5 ns.
:toast:
:D No, not higher but faster. :toast:Quote:
Originally Posted by eva2000
which bios are you on HCC?
yea cl1.5 is faster then cl2 and appears to be a bit more stable on my winnnie, for BH5. i have other instabilities waiting to be ironed out though, hehe.
edit: woops just saw 331-1.
:D Just saw You use the 331-2 BIOS - read a post from the european G.SKILL guy here testing the new G.SKILL with Winbond UTT and he also used the same, now I wonder which would be best for low latency RAM.Quote:
Originally Posted by pershoot
I remember the 331-1 I use was recommended......., but maybe I'm wrong.
Did You compare -1 to -2 ?
:toast:
im currently testing 331-3. both 1 and 2 cause lockups for me past 240. very wierd.
Nice clocks! You've got some nice stuff there.
woooo-wee wish my sempy would pass 2.6 let alone 3+ lol glad you got it clockin' the way you like good job man :)
:D THX people - I'm really praying that the FX-57 will have no subzero bug, personally I think it won't but some say it might be......
Would be a nice accessoir in my rig at all :p:
:toast:
dude if you got an fx 57 then you would own all, lol seriously look at the damage you do with an fx 55....leavin' me impared lol
:D Could be happen soon or later............ :p:Quote:
Originally Posted by i found nemo
:toast:
Wow man, mad freakin props to that lol. Ridiculous voltages, temps, scores, timings.....EVERYTHINGS JUST RIDICULOUS! :wierd:
Congrats
:D Yeah - THX mate, looks like my user nick becomes reality more and more.......... :pimp:Quote:
Originally Posted by Nubius
:toast:
mad props man, crazy computer you have there, mind swapping it with me? :D
off topic: hmm... should i get a new mobo for my celly and see how far it will go with this TCCD? lol. 5ghz anyone? :p:
wow! thats totally INSANE!!!
25secs in super pi.....droolage
:D UPDATE:
Great board, dropped the voltages, stable so far with:
LDT 1,3
NB/SB 1,6
CPU 1,76 (BIOS 1,475 x 123%)
RAM 3,72
Notice that the same CPU with the same single phase cooling required 1,80V on my NEO2 and the RAM 3,9 even at 275 MHz.......
:toast:
is ur BH5 running at 279mhz 1.5cas?
if so JEEZ!!! thats crazy
i can get my UTT to run 1.5-2-2-5 up to 250mhz but 279 on bh5! man ur insane
Those are some awesome results! Is running 1.5 cas better than 2? I can run mine at 1.5, but I don't see any difference in benches. Am I missing something?
:D Ran my first 3D Mark 2001 ever today - at 12 x 278 and 1,5-2-2-5..... :p:Quote:
Originally Posted by Korpse
Bad score I know - but GPU ran at stock speed, did it only to check system stability.
Maybe I'm going to tweak my GPU a bit........... :banana:
:toast:
He, now you badly need a x8x0xt :D
No, he doesn't ;)Quote:
Originally Posted by LowRun
He's no gamer. :D It would be a shame to waste so much money on a benching card ;) :P
I can understand that as i wouldn't spend so much myself (and i'm a gamer even if not hardcore) but then, for what does he use all this cpu power and bandwidth?Quote:
Originally Posted by SAE
for browsing XS ^^
what else would u do with a 3.3ghz fx???Quote:
Originally Posted by Jort