If you screw it up it can be fixed for RMA with seal string, superglue, and a razor blade........I know, I did it twice!
Printable View
If you screw it up it can be fixed for RMA with seal string, superglue, and a razor blade........I know, I did it twice!
It is better to not have it on at all :slap:Quote:
Originally Posted by Magnj
4-7°c cooler now
oces a little better
needs less vcore for same settings
Quote:
Originally Posted by sabrewolf732
There is also a die size difference- winnies are much much smaller than newcastles or clawhammers and dont touch as much of the IHS.
Exactly how much?! 500mhz better? .1vcore less?Quote:
Originally Posted by TEDY
:stick:
Yea im ........guessing 50Mhz more ??
he told me around 50mhz more then before...
and 0.1-0.2 less vcore need
example
before 310*9 at 1.675v....now at 1.5+11%
you get the idea :=)
I just took mine off a few days ago and I'm getting much better temps -10c and better clocks at lower voltages with watercooling. 2800MHZ which was a little flaky before has been running prime 95 for 24 hours now. So, it improved my overclock from 1.53v@2700Mhz to 1.6v@2800MHZ and it runs -10c cooler.
I did butcher it up quite a bit and knocked off completely two of those surface mount resistors or whatever those are under the spreader... I wish I had taken pics because it looks like it's dead as a door nail but.... I put it back in and it fired right up as usual. :p:
Thats still 1.65vcoreQuote:
Originally Posted by TEDY
;)
i just gave example....nothing more :p
But, wtf does that have to do with how they do under -0 temps????????? That would have no influence IMO, :slap:Quote:
Originally Posted by dippyskoodlez
The spacer on the CPU's are not to transfer heat but to protect the fragile core.
They need to just go back to the original XP style then. Crush pads and an exposed core if people are obviously getting much better temps and OC'ing gains.
is it worth with stock cooling?
doesn't it lower your cpu and so less pressure on the core and so almost no decrease of temps