"05xx" Winchesters - How are they clocking?

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Ein0

Even if your cpu does crap oc'ing can you still get good ram mhz's by just lowering the multi, and have low cpu voltage and stable?

---

lowering multi still cant make it handle 260+fsb

Oh that sucks even more then

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by SPQQKY

Here is a screeny that shows the voltages. I am going to post my full results in the GA-K8NS Ultra-939 section.

---

Is that stable? :slobber: :slobber: :slobber:

ADA3200DIK4BI
CBBID 0501CPMW
1126655A50101

10x260 1.45V stable

Anything higher then 260 .. garbage in BIOS (E_NAME.BIN word everywhere), random boots, etc.
Didnt tried 3x HTT over 260FSB yet.

I hope this isn't a sign of the new FX-55's that are coming in the next couple weeks.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by |3ourne

Anakin I LOVE YOU avatar. She is sooo pruuuuuuuuuuuty :smileysex: :buddies:

now about the topic .
I have had a week 50 and 51 and both could not break 2.6 ghz
50 topped out at a paltry 2.5 ghz while the 51 steamed on till about 2.6 .
cbbfd 0450 tpfw and cbbid 0451 epaw.

for 0448 the spaw stepping seems to be the best. 0448 Spaw is the golden winchester.

---

I know, she's my wife for god's sake! :banana: :banana: :banana:

Now on topic, generally it's the lack of the draw when it comes to the potential each cpu has. Some would do 2.6 (which is not bad if you keep in mind that they are 1.8G and 2.0G initially for 3000+ and 3200+ respectively), some others would do 2.7 (even better).

I'm still waiting for Venice though ;)

Anyone have any cbbid 0451 epaw's? and how was the oc on it?

I can't remember if my 0451 was a epaw but I think it was and it was total crap. :rolleyes:

sorry i meant fpaw(like it makes a difference :slobber: )

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by speedstream5621

Is that stable? :slobber: :slobber: :slobber:

---

Yes, it is.