OH YEAH!!!! 2x256MB BH-5 @ DDR552 6-2-2-2.0-1T on Neo2 / Winchester 3200+

Printable View

Show 100 post(s) from this thread on one page

02-08-2005, 02:42 PM
cpulloverclock

Quote:

Originally Posted by bachus_anonym

@cpuoverclock...

so it's more like DDR564 (2800/10), not DDR572...

Sandra seems a bit low though... What else can you run at this speed?

9x multiplier not 1/2

317.87*0.9 = 286.08

sandra score isnt low cuz 9x multiplier is bad, 8x, 7x, 6x... are worse

try a memory bench with a 3000+, u'll see I'm right
02-08-2005, 02:46 PM
Rabbi_NZ

on 183 divider, multiply the HTT speed by 11/12... 313x(11/12)=286-287 MHz = DDR 572-574
02-08-2005, 02:46 PM
HARDCORECLOCKER

Quote:

Originally Posted by bachus_anonym

I don't get it, HARDCORECLOCKER :confused:
That screenie you just showed doesn't even come close to showing BH-5 ability. SuperPi 1M is VERY cpu clock- cpu L2 cache dependant, as well as Pifast4.1.
The only reason it's 25s is that that BH-5 is paired with FX that runs north of 3.3Ghz ;). If you were on 2750Mhz Winnie instead of 3.3GHz FX you could only dream of below 30s result.

:D Yep - that's what I tried to say - sure 25sec is depending on CPU speed and max. tweaks with the A64 tweaker but that for I've posted that I do NOT want to compare a FX to a Winnie - only show the "normal" ability of BH-5 to go 275 or even more at higher voltages.

Don't mess around with that screenie - took it with all the settings.... :toast:
02-08-2005, 02:46 PM
bachus_anonym

Quote:

Originally Posted by cpulloverclock

9x multiplier not 1/2

317.87*0.9 = 286.08

at 9.5x it would be at DDR540 and at 8.5x that would be DDR533...

EDIT: my bad, I looked at bottom screenie.... 313x9
02-08-2005, 02:49 PM
bachus_anonym

Quote:

Originally Posted by HARDCORECLOCKER

:D Yep - that's what I tried to say - sure 25sec is depending on CPU speed and max. tweaks with the A64 tweaker but that for I've posted that I do NOT want to compare a FX to a Winnie - only show the "normal" ability of BH-5 to go 275 or even more at higher voltages.

Don't mess around with that screenie - took it with all the settings.... :toast:

sorry for double post, again....

show me some 3D benches at that DDR550 and SuperPi 16M and then I will believe that DDR550 is normal achievement for BH-5... ;)
there's bunch of screenies floating around here with BH-5 @ > DDR560 but only benches I see are either Sandra or SuperPi 1M. That's all....

I encourage everyone to run just a little bit more benches once they hit some high clocks... We should all walk away from this silly trend of showing only SuperPi 1M and Sandra as a proof of "what that mem can do"...

EDIT: At the moment, I have four sets of 2x256MB BH-5 memory (PC3200 LvL II, PC3500 LvL II, PC3200 KHX and PC3500 KHX)... all of them are memtest stable for about 1hr @ 265-270 but only this set of Mushkins is benchable at 276....
02-08-2005, 02:51 PM
cpulloverclock

My BH-5s are stable at DDR545

I hope more in a few days with my 9NDA3+ rev2
02-08-2005, 03:05 PM
HARDCORECLOCKER

Quote:

Originally Posted by bachus_anonym

sorry for double post, again....

show me some 3D benches at that DDR550 and SuperPi 16M and then I will believe that DDR550 is normal achievement for BH-5... ;)
there's bunch of screenies floating around here with BH-5 @ > DDR560 but only benches I see are either Sandra or SuperPi 1M. That's all....

I encourage everyone to run just a little bit more benches once they hit some high clocks... We should all walk away fro mthis trend of showing only SuperPi 1M and Sandra as a proof of "what that mem can do"...

:D O.K. mate - looks like You're a real analyst........, You won't believe but I never ever ran a 3D mark in my whole life because I'm still the "proud" owner of a FX 5200 video card....... :eek: - but I'll do it soon, my LEADTEK 6600 GT Extreme has still arrived and maybe my DFI NF4 comes tomorrow.
But this has nothin' to do with BH-5, here You have another example:

http://img232.exs.cx/img232/3690/mushkin2757kx.jpg

This is done with MUSHKIN - the bandwith is not as high as done with the CORSAIR shown in first screenie because I was not able to tweak the MUSHKIN as much as the CORSAIR with the A64 tweaker.

But also a good result in the "normal" range for BH-5 with high Vdimm.

:toast:
02-08-2005, 03:11 PM
bachus_anonym

@HARDCORECLOCKER....

Don't get me wrong, but you see, I just don't know how should I lay out more clearly....
There's bunch of other benchmarks than just SuperPi 1M that will crap out on "not-so-stable" mem overclock. SuperPi 1M will let that slide...
Can you run at least SuperPi 16M - that (with your FX) should be no more that 10min of your time.... That would be an indicator that this DDR550 will most likely pass 3DM01 or 3DM03....
That's just all I want to see.... I would love to see more people starting threads like that.... Not just "oh, I got my BH-5 up to, say, DDR560 but it's only good for SuperPi 1M and Sandra" threads....
02-08-2005, 03:51 PM
bachus_anonym

I promise, last time I double post.... :D

Just a little something to show you what I mean... Did it 10 mins ago - multi x9 because Winnie won't take 2.84Ghz... No tweaking from A64 Tweaker...

284x9 - DDR568 6-2-2-2.0-1T

http://www.clockmehigh.com/xtreme/Ne..._SPi1M_8x6.jpg
02-08-2005, 04:53 PM
cpulloverclock

U can do a memory bench and Everest at 9*278 please
02-08-2005, 05:01 PM
bachus_anonym

Quote:

Originally Posted by cpulloverclock

U can do a memory bench and Everest at 9*278 please

I attached Sandra and Everest benches @ 276x10.... Just add about 40-50Mb/s to it and you will have an idea what 278x10 will look like....
I'm going out soon so I won't be able to do that anytime soon - I need couple shots to celebrate ;)
I can tell you one thing though... I'm not exactly sure if this is Server2003 problem but at anything north of 280 I cannot run Sandra Memory Benchmark... It finishes it but instead of results and bars I get "Not enough resources error" in the fileds where results should be seen :(
02-08-2005, 05:08 PM
cpulloverclock

Quote:

Originally Posted by bachus_anonym

I attached Sandra and Everest benches @ 276x10.... Just add about 40-50Mb/s to it and you will have an idea what 278x10 will look like....
I'm going out soon so I won't be able to do that anytime soon - I need couple shots to celebrate ;)
I can tell you one thing though... I'm not exactly sure if this is Server2003 problem but at anything north of 280 I cannot run Sandra Memory Benchmark... It finishes it but instead of results and bars I get "Not enough resources error" in the fileds where results should be seen :(

nope, I want an everest and memory bench at 9*278 to see if my scores are correct

a comparison with u
02-08-2005, 06:38 PM
bachus_anonym

3 Attachment(s)

Quote:

Originally Posted by cpulloverclock

nope, I want an everest and memory bench at 9*278 to see if my scores are correct

a comparison with u

damn... vodka is waiting, bud :D but there you go...

http://www.xtremesystems.org/forums/...id=24301&stc=1

http://www.xtremesystems.org/forums/...id=24302&stc=1

http://www.xtremesystems.org/forums/...id=24303&stc=1
02-08-2005, 10:21 PM
cpulloverclock

thx a lot

I'm sleeping :sleep:
02-09-2005, 03:42 PM
Da_BoKa

what vdimm do you need for 284 mhz?
02-09-2005, 04:38 PM
cpulloverclock

new scores with a K8nS 939

better but limited by the fsb

http://membres.lycos.fr/cpulloverclo...ue/cpumark.gif
DDR569.72
http://membres.lycos.fr/cpulloverclo...que/sandra.gif

Show 100 post(s) from this thread on one page