Well actually, NC's are total crap in 2001Se in my opinion :p:Quote:
Originally Posted by misteroadster
http://service.futuremark.com/compare?2k1=8167236
Printable View
Well actually, NC's are total crap in 2001Se in my opinion :p:Quote:
Originally Posted by misteroadster
http://service.futuremark.com/compare?2k1=8167236
yes, i think both are interesting ;) thx macci :toast:
I'm not totally agree with you , i think there's a 200Mhz lack ok , but not so much.Quote:
Originally Posted by =STE=BloodAngel
here's an old run with NC 939 0,13 :
http://service.futuremark.com/compare?2k1=8066437
if have it today i could have 1000-1300 pts more , so 34K probably.
Yes they perform a lot better on S939 (DC makes up for the lack of cache). But just compare my 1Mb and 512kb scores. The 1Mb scores almost 3K more, while the NC is clocked 200Mhz higher and it has more memory bandwith.
As you can see I used exactly the same Catalyst drivers 2 :)
time will tell us. ;)
I'll be back when I get my new stuff together :cool:
Will hopefully arrive friday:
Asus A8V Deluxe S939 Rev2
AMD 64 3200+ 90nm Winchester
Already in my hands :banana: :
1024MB G.Skill PC4400
Club3D X800Pro Vivo @ XT PE, Air cooled 560/1200Mhz
Tagan 480W Psu
héhé, i hope you will be be happy with your winnie :banana:
Here is mine :) 3400@2520@1.6v XT@607/614 Mem = Default all stock cooled and no Mods i think its pretty good im able to do 2530 but dont have a PS also very stable :)
http://imagens.foruns.org/godmyster/XT.JPG http://imagens.foruns.org/godmyster/CPU.JPG
:confused:
Where is the score ?
The rules are 600/600 or 520/560. :stick: :D
My (temporary) best 520/560 run
http://service.futuremark.com/compare?2k1=8237254
Any challenger's ? :)
I can get just over 30k with 2500 MHz., give me a little time. ;) Edited out the WRONG compare. :rolleyes:Quote:
Originally Posted by misteroadster
You're welcome ;)Quote:
Originally Posted by spaceman
:toast:
Here's the one I thought I had, I'm pretty sure I can improve it. Stock 520/560, BTW. http://service.futuremark.com/compare?2k1=8236821
can you give me the specs required : Cpu, Ram, FSB, Mobo, drivers.....
I got the score here.. http://imagens.foruns.org/godmyster/30.3k.JPG dont have a link because i dont have net in the other system :\
what was your settings ? and Cpu, ram ..........?
If it's not a 520/560 or 600/600 run i can't accept this , sorry . :(
It was with 600/600 on the card and 2520mhz on the CPU.. ram was default. :)
:confused:Quote:
Originally Posted by Godmyster
I can't accept your result , a link is required.
That was the Max that i could do on my card without artefacts i thought the thread was about that.. but i dont have a link because i dont have net in the other system :( and im using 56k atm and my modem doesnt work in w2k.. oh we..
Gomdmyster , this thread is made for compare the results of differents setup at same GPU frequency.
If you can't give me a link (i 'll include them in the table) your score is interestless :/
There's not so much rules , but i have to be strict.
Here's one stock card. 8 x 279.76 acpi tweaked. Nice round number too.
http://service.futuremark.com/compare?2k1=8238968
wow , congratz dude ;) , great performance !!!!! :toast:
Good Job, Perfect run. :slobber:
i tried a 280 run with 560/520 too but i could only get 29K6 , i'll retry later with W2K :toast:
your car low is very impressive :eek:
Thanks, you should be able to beat it with win2k. The only tweak I used was the acpi, so there's room for a better score
Very happy to see you there :)
Very interesting compare already. :toast:
Phil can you tell me your timings please for the table ? ,and catalysts are 4.10 official ? ;)
I was using the beta 8.07 drivers. The timings were 2225715. Good luck with win2k