When I say fake I don't mean he's trying to pass it off as real. I mean it's a bugged or not real score.
Printable View
When I say fake I don't mean he's trying to pass it off as real. I mean it's a bugged or not real score.
This is not a bug. This is a cheat. The ones who use this jolly well know they are cheating.
Aquamark gets a big boost as well. I do not consider this legit score, this is with just old drivers, 560/1260, but by nulling PS 1 and 2, the scores get boosted by 8-9K. My 100225 score was with full settings, but if you look at the ARC you can guess how some can easily hit 80K with 3.4C and air-cooled 6800 GT
http://www.vr-zone.com.sg/Shamino/6800/aqmcheat1.JPG
http://arc.aquamark3.com/arc/arc_vie...run=1487769217
These tricks can increase AQM scores by +/- 9K and 3D mark 2003 scores by 6-7K.
With this trick and running 61.36 + 600/1265 I should be quite close to the 120K milestone, but of course it can be considered a "cheat".
I can'r find these Boxes were you cann klick to get the PS off.
Can you post a Screen.
I want to test how far my scores are pushed with this cheat/bug ..!
Don´t bother, it´s like cheating in games online... Eventually you´ll use it all the time out of habit. The ppl who use this to boost their internet-penises deserve to be taken out and shot. This is NOT meant to flame Lardarse/shamino but the 80 K aquamark dudes.
its like this, if u think u should run 3dmark03 with it off, then you deserve to play all ur pretty games like far cry with it off... you'd find urself crying because its so ugly... dont do it. :D
Shamino, u should get Nvidia 6800 SLI, i'm sure 120k in A3 will be easily broken without any cheats.
uhh, of course , u will need a Xeon mobo with dual PCIe slots.
If AQM is even remotely CPU limited, the Xeon will kill the scores.Quote:
Originally posted by Kanavit
Shamino, u should get Nvidia 6800 SLI, i'm sure 120k in A3 will be easily broken without any cheats.
uhh, of course , u will need a Xeon mobo with dual PCIe slots.
Lardarse, have you asked Futuremark whether this is why they have put a stop on scores being published and if you have , or do, can you also ask them if they can put a stop on it ?
Regards
Andy
/I have, and its been a few weeks but I have no response from them. I'm doubtful they can stop this unless they come up with a new patch, which they probably are working on already.
man...tricky tricky...its so stupid for nyone to cheat ona benchmark...wats the point...everyone knows u cheated
120K will surely fall under this "cheat" demo
http://www.vr-zone.com.sg/Shamino/6800/119aqm.JPG
Even 3dmark 2001 gets a nice boost, 20+ fps in Drag low and even 2-3 fps in system limited test like lobby high. I can easily break 35K with Intel using this.
I think you are forgetting the P4EE is a Xeon processor running on a higher bus speed. And in fact the Xeons are now available with even more cache than the EE...Quote:
Originally posted by Hallowed
If AQM is even remotely CPU limited, the Xeon will kill the scores.
But this Xeons are very expensive :(Quote:
Originally posted by Soulburner
I think you are forgetting the P4EE is a Xeon processor running on a higher bus speed. And in fact the Xeons are now available with even more cache than the EE...
But would AquaMark benefit from a dual cpu setup?
I don't think so.
I thought I just read about a chipset that will support two PCIe x16 slots, for a desktop cpu (forgot if it was intle or amd, probably intel)
the nForce4 will support dual PCIe I think...
maybe this is a cheat like the lod bias settings?
does it spoil the image? so does lod do...and everybody uses it..
_zZz_
not if it breaks 20k in 3dmark03.Quote:
Originally posted by Hallowed
If AQM is even remotely CPU limited, the Xeon will kill the scores.