Nice result to Jeff :D
Just behind MrIcee, you can take him :p
So wheres your score [N8]??? :confused:
Printable View
Nice result to Jeff :D
Just behind MrIcee, you can take him :p
So wheres your score [N8]??? :confused:
Cheers :).
Working on a sub 59 now. Got it a bit lower so far, not gonna bother sticking the result up until im under 59s though :).
Cmon pedro - dont tell me youve given up already? :D.
You as well Opp - no excuse, it only takes 60 seconds (or less :p) and I know damn well you can beat me :D.
Nice result with that nforce2 board rys - shame about the FSB options though. Which particular board was that on? Asus by any chance?
PiLsY.
Got it in one I believe PiLsY on the ASUS I believe :p
Rys and N8:)
Thanks guys...I believe only better is yet to come from the AMD guys:D
Randi:D
EDIT: You AMD guys running WinXP are handicapping yourselves, XP has a tendency on an AMD system to suck the bandwidth down severly. Witness Car and Lobby in 3DMark2001, in which an identical system and settings running XP, 98 and 2000 put Win 2000/SP2 ahead of the other 2 in FPS. Just an observation on my part but the switch made a tremendous difference for me in bandwidth.
Thanks for the tip Mr. Icee. I'm installing Win2k on one of my systems right now to see if it helps with this PiFast benchmark as well as my SETI@home benchmark.
:toast:
The more people posting the better :D
Yeah, A7N8X. I had 180fsb working for a morning the day after I got the board, 2333MHz and 180MHz mem @ CL2.0, 2-2-2 would have flown.Quote:
Originally posted by PiLsY
Cheers :).
Nice result with that nforce2 board rys - shame about the FSB options though. Which particular board was that on? Asus by any chance?
PiLsY.
Ah well, I'll pester AMD for another system to play with for a wee while, hopefully they'll oblige :)
Should be someone else under 60s soon I think too ;)
Rys
EDIT: MrIcee, thanks for the tip about Win2K :) I'll be sure to install it if AMD let me have another CPU or box for a while! Fingers crossed :D
:doh: :DQuote:
Originally posted by KAIN
Nice result to Jeff :D
Just behind MrIcee, you can take him :p
I added your new result this morning :p
KAIN,Quote:
Originally posted by KAIN
So wheres your score [N8]??? :confused:
Hehe :)
I've actually never run that bench before. I'm smack in the middle of working out any bugs in my new H2O setup, as well as unlocking a new 1600+ that I purchased and was able to hit 2100MHz w/ on air(not stable). I've got my original 1600+ clocking higher than it ever has now w/ the water, so I'm very confident in the clocks I'll be able to hit w/ this new chip once its unlocked. When I'm finished w/ all this stuff I've been doing in the past couple weeks PC-wise(been hectic) I definitely need to do some benching as I haven't run 3DMark since the 29.17 Detonators, and I've got better cooling on both my CPU & GPU now :)
P.S. Also been folding 24/7 for our team as it appears we are in a fierce 3-way battle to the top :D
So, I've sorta been doing my part...slacking nonetheless tho ;)
Great job Jeff..congrats:toast:
I'll attempt to move up once I get some new hardware in my hands someday:)
Randi:D
It will be a pleasure getting "smacked down" by someone like yourself. ;) Considering it took me a 2400 to squeek by your 2200 I look forward to your new hardware too.Quote:
Originally posted by MrIcee
Great job Jeff..congrats:toast:
I'll attempt to move up once I get some new hardware in my hands someday:)
Randi:D
Ran the best I could aircooled... 2322mhz @ 154mhz fsb.
Now I wanna see your TEC result :D
Sure... just need a new power supply! I still have it all set up and rarrin to go ;)Quote:
Originally posted by KAIN
Now I wanna see your TEC result :D
Hi everybody,
this is using 2400+@2400(201*12)
edit: change a new picture, with better result
Mulling over the ##'s it looks like it will take an amd @ 200fsb about 2.75 ghz of speed to over run a p4 running pilsy's 3.6 p4 and memory. sysfailur is the closest.. erm was :) (2.6+)
Well zteve is now #1 AMD system :D
I edited your score zteve to put that time in :)
I'd agree around 2.7-2.8gig is gonna beat the 3.6gig P4's
Well , I top the table. If you are Australian and looking at it upside down of course. :)
I just did my home machine and got my XP1600@1660MHz to 96.00 seconds.
My friend at work has a 2.53GHz P4 running in a Dell ( presumably a 845 motherboard ) and he took 141 seconds. This seems awfully slow ...
Interestingly, he thinks it's pretty fast, as I told him the score of the PIII at 650Mhz. :eek:
Regards
Andy
Hehe, P4's stock with memory at 133mhz are not the fastest machines ever ;)
Just got 66.96 @ 2.5ghz... will post later...
http://www.adventurevision.com/somepictures/6655.gif
Little bit cooler tonight so I could push just a little harder. ;)
Heh, well here's my next two best... Funny thing, out of no where my multiplier changed to 7.... so I was like... ehh, wtf? And I tried changing it and it worked!!!! So apparently my cpu is unlocked now! hahah Anyway, the first pic is before unlock, and the 2nd one is after. Notice that I'm like 35mhz slower, but my fsb is juiced up, and the scores are about the same. This tells you that the overall score is more strictly mhz it seems....
EDIT: KAIN, please delete my other score and slap the one I just submitted up instead ;)
http://www.maximumoc.com/img/hardwar...z_hexus_pi.jpg
http://www.maximumoc.com/img/hardwar...us_pi_6696.jpg
Hey sysfailur, try running the benchmark two times in a row, one right after the other. For some reason when I do this my second score gets better.
Well big fight going on for #1 AMD spot :D
Jeff's taken it again hehe