****Blender Ryzen render battle benchmark****

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by ReKcOlNu

I try make chart, ;)
http://i.imgur.com/6AD441R.png

---

My Phenomenon II runs at 3200MHz during the blender. Thanks for making the chart for easy comparison.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Dr_Swizz

Well, there is not much more to tell, except that for some reason CnQ works despite using a 22.5 multiplier.
I am sure there are other Deneb CPUs out there equally capable though, especially those of later production (I got this one just weeks before they completely disappeared from the market).

---

Interesting, might also be MB related. I also got mine in amazon when they were clearing them out, but CnQ goes away over 18.5x as with my old C0. Only tried it in the ancient sig 790FX with a 09' bios. Next month I'll be able to confirm the year/week, as I took note of it somewhere.

3 runs on a real daily driver PC. Closed case mid tower water cooled. 7+year old operating system.

Conservative 4.2
http://i1253.photobucket.com/albums/...psw6bhyjqn.jpg

Gaming 4.5
http://i1253.photobucket.com/albums/...psigvvmlnx.jpg

Extreme 5.0
http://i1253.photobucket.com/albums/...psjcbu3rdf.jpg

Athlon 64 LE-1600 (single core) @ 3.6GHz 13:51

http://www.xtremesystems.org/forums/...4&d=1485628696

Attachment 132214

http://imagizer.imageshack.us/v2/160...923/Lbm1FQ.png

http://www.xtremesystems.org/forums/...7&d=1485799844

FX-8350@5.1GHz 1:40

Attachment 132217

Interesting, why is FX Vishera worse than Thuban in this benchamrk...

Because as stilt proved on overclockers forums....this application is poorly coded. He added avx and a few other things in his version....both newer intel and amd performed 40% better.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by haylui

My Phenomenon II runs at 3200MHz during the blender. Thanks for making the chart for easy comparison.

---

OK :)

http://i.imgur.com/wjji1UG.png

22.70 @ 150

My rig in sig w/ HOF

http://www.xtremesystems.org/fugger/ryzn3.jpg

So about 27.24 seconds @ 5g with 16 threads hypothetically.

Vs my sandy @ 5g with a hypothetical 16 threads doing 32.16.

Guess they have squeezed some gains out over past few years.

Theoretical ballpark results fixxed.

To bad no other speeds done on ryzen. I could come up with a close guesstimate @ same clocks.

20.01s 150 samples on slow ass dual 2680 v4 es @ 1.9GHz

Why does lightmans 4790k look like it would kick the crap out of your chip charles?

Eta @ 16 thread 4.4 gig is 29.99. Surely 600 mhz would catch and surpass your chip core for core thread for thread. Is it a very early ES?

My chip is QS

I will find a slower screen to show scaling

https://c1.staticflickr.com/4/3801/3...13eb0e1b_b.jpg

5150 MHz i7-7700K 45.83s

37.56 for my humble broadwell-e can't wait to see some more numbers from AMD, they 6c/12t stuff looks like a steal if the benchmarks hold true.

http://img.techpowerup.org/170217/ryzen4554.jpg

Took my lil 3770k @ 4.6ghz 1:06.28.
Tempted to ramp it up to 4.8+ to see if I can get it under a minute, but it doesn't really matter at this point. My ass is already kicked so bad.
Really happy AMD is doing something again. I hate intel for their premium priced K series chips and premium chipsets required to overclock. Rather than catering to overclockers, they exploit them. Next build will definitely be red.