OMG congrats !!!Quote:
Originally Posted by Mydog
Printable View
OMG congrats !!!Quote:
Originally Posted by Mydog
a lit bit pushing
SLI GTX680@ 1275/7088
http://3dmark.com/3dm11/3079930;jses...vece7lb2auzdwy
http://img821.imageshack.us/img821/565/tercerak.jpg
me neither i want something like before playing BF3 on def settings the card sometimes uses 1,175 at 1000 core wich is nonsense for me either way they dont heat like othersQuote:
Originally Posted by pakitoesp
Got my EK blocks! Thanks a lot Tiborr for your support!
Temperature are wonderfull 42°c after three hours of gaming, quality is very good and assembly is easier than 7970. But i'm a little disappointed one of my cards is not as good as the other...
http://tof.canardpc.com/preview2/903...4a5c1aa780.jpg
http://tof.canardpc.com/preview2/db8...0c12421357.jpg
http://tof.canardpc.com/preview2/b75...605498bfcd.jpg
great setup mate !!!Quote:
Originally Posted by pinto
well happens i cant give more than +180 maybe one is better than the other but still monsters i luv them
cheers
Sergio
Great result Pinto, I also hope to reach my EK blocks ..... with water is the limit or goes over?
on this tech i dont think u need the WB for go further on OC for what i read we are already unlocked to 1,21 unless u do a voltmod to itQuote:
Originally Posted by pakitoesp
Yes water is only for cooling and silence no more oc headroom, with 7970 there is at leat 50mhz to gain on core. On the 680 the ram only oc more +50mhz. Some more points:
http://tof.canardpc.com/preview2/fd5...0bf4e8c2b5.jpg
Very nice build you got there Pinto and your 680's seem to OC better than mine.:up:
Had some LN2 fun here this evening.
Attachment 124951
I'm not impressed by the scaling with four 680's on any of the benchmarks I've tested.
Attachment 124952
Attachment 124954
Attachment 124953
the cards seems to be improving each day slowly i try not tu punish them now they do perfect +200 on core +540 on mem :)
1259 - 1300 core / 7088 - 7120 mem
http://img141.imageshack.us/img141/499/quintab.jpg
Uploaded with ImageShack.us
damn sergiooooo nice stuff dude overclock or nice on those babies , if i wasnt a ati guy i be on that ship for sure . . . man they run cool also imagine the power with some blocks :) good showQuote:
Originally Posted by andressergio
thanks bud second card wont do +200 +540 at first but every day i test a bit and now both passes fine im very happy now time to up CPU :)Quote:
Originally Posted by the_real_7
my score: done on a 4.9ghz 2500k with 2x4GB at 1833 9-11-9-1T
http://img32.imageshack.us/img32/5579/gpuscore.png
and now CPU up !!!
http://img826.imageshack.us/img826/1351/sexto.jpg
Uploaded with ImageShack.us
I managed to score P9795 with my CPU only running @3.6ghz. Not too shabby for an older i7 860. Also, the one downside of having 16gb ram on a P55 motherboard is that it just doesn't like to run very fast. Oh well...
http://3dmark.com/3dm11/3089360
Quote:
Originally Posted by Andrew LB
Great mate cards are awesome
whats your overclock in that? 3dmark only picks up the ram being 3100mhz, so i know you added 100mhz there, but the core is just reads as 700 for everyone.Quote:
Originally Posted by Andrew LB
any ss max on single ?Quote:
Originally Posted by andressergio
i didnt test more Gaul as im very happy with the results but i will test for ya ;)Quote:
Originally Posted by Gaul
hope single got better / higher OC than SLI
luv this babies :)
http://3dmark.com/3dm11/3105351;jses...b1pqtd7mrhwkfm
http://img205.imageshack.us/img205/8262/septimok.jpg
Uploaded with ImageShack.us
Anyone knows if the PCIE 3.0 is going to be fixed? I wonder if its going to make any difference in performance.
I'm not in a hurry to buy 680s, but it feels wrong to buy those cards and having them running at PCIE 2.0 at x8...
It might make a little difference with up to four GPU's, I've never heard of anyone in the existence of PCIe suffering from performance losses do to a lack of PCIe bandwidth.Quote:
Originally Posted by Defoler