Attachment 121132
Printable View
cause coretemp seems to be calibrated just like thuban. no way minimum temp is 14c, yet thats exactly what we see with current generationQuote:
Originally Posted by Stukov
and if thats the case then 71c load is well past the thermal limit (from the ozeros review).
Contact surface I'd guess^^Quote:
Originally Posted by Stukov
Contact surface I'd guess^^Quote:
Originally Posted by Stukov
I think we will not see JF here for the next six months...:p:
AMD Bulldozer / FX-8150 Desktop Performance Review @ [H]ardOCP
http://hardforum.com/showthread.php?t=1642860
AMD Bulldozer / FX-8150 Gameplay Performance Review @ HardOCP
http://hardforum.com/showthread.php?t=1642861
To be perfectly fair, JF is a server guy, far as we know BD could be great in servers *shrugs*Quote:
Originally Posted by Dimitriman
I don't know whether to laugh or cry,all the hype, 32nm, I've had a 990FX MB waiting for the past god knows how many months... I guess I'll have to upgrade back to the Phenom II x2(@4) 4GHz :rofl:
I'll wait for more reviews, hopefully there is some light in the end of the tunnel.
I suspect that light is only the train, seconds before rolling you over.Quote:
Originally Posted by JkS
To be honest, JF spent months feeding everyone bullsh*t about this processor and you guys are cool with it?Quote:
Originally Posted by Stukov
The second thing they teach you in business school (profits come first) is to NEVER EVER EVER deceive your customers. It is far better to just keep your mouth shut and say nothing about an upcoming product than to have your comments turn out to be inaccurate or flat out dishonest. Nothing is ever gained by giving misinformation either. Especially when customers realize they've been played for the fool the entire time.
http://www.guru3d.com/article/amd-fx...cessor-review/
http://www.legionhardware.com/articl...fx_4170,1.html
http://hothardware.com/Reviews/AMD-F...er-Has-Landed/
http://www.pcper.com/reviews/Process...th-AMD-Victory
http://hexus.net/tech/reviews/cpu/32...dozer-fx-8150/
http://www.legitreviews.com/article/1741/1/
http://www.hardocp.com/article/2011/...ormance_review
http://www.bit-tech.net/hardware/cpu...-8150-review/1
http://benchmarkreviews.com/index.ph...=831&Itemid=63
http://www.computerbase.de/artikel/p...amd-bulldozer/
http://www.lostcircuits.com/mambo//i...d=102&Itemid=1
http://www.bjorn3d.com/articles/AMD_...ozer/2125.html
http://www.techspot.com/review/452-a...dozer-fx-cpus/
http://www.vortez.net/articles_pages..._review,1.html
If AMD released it during i920 era , it would be pretty good , but with sand today :shakes:
Our servers are getting hammered guys so some images / charts may not be available. Working on the issue now. :(
Remind me to talk to you about hosting services. ;)Quote:
Originally Posted by SKYMTL
So..
OBR was right
Terrace was right
What a day...
Guess I should pick up a 2600k while they are still "only" 315$
SKYMTL: This page is broken. http://www.hardwarecanucks.com/forum...review-11.html
I hate AMD because it NEVER releases their products on time.... and, when it releases the product... is pretty dissapointing or bugged :D
And this is why won't be an octa-core from Intel this year, I just can't believe it.
Bleh, disappointing, going phenom II x6 seems like it'd be about as good as getting a bulldozer =/
OK in the sea of all this stuff, the main thing I'm waiting for is Movieman's WCG testing. I want to see what it does there.
There are some bright spots for BD, but for the most part, I am extremely disappointed. Gaming is my major focus, and unless PD brings a rabbit out of the hat, I'm pretty sure my next build will be Intel...sigh.
I was wrong 1½ years ago when I stated Bulldozer would be worthy competition for Gulftown...
On it. Will be up in a few seconds. :)Quote:
Originally Posted by blindbox