would love to see graphics tests w/ ram like that!
hypothetically speaking ;) , if BD clocks ram similarly, what are the best kits to get?
edit: found a set of gskill 2133 8.9.8 for a good price, couldnt pass them up :D
Printable View
would love to see graphics tests w/ ram like that!
hypothetically speaking ;) , if BD clocks ram similarly, what are the best kits to get?
edit: found a set of gskill 2133 8.9.8 for a good price, couldnt pass them up :D
A couple of FM1 boards show up on NewEgg....
http://www.newegg.com/Product/Produc...eId=1&name=FM1
Where's my A8-3850? I'm ready to order! :D
Those 4,2+ GHz results from OBR are all BS. CPU-Z doesn't show the real multi.
1.58 show it OK ,-)...but this is not retail 3850...but 3850 ES
No, it still doesn't.
show me 1.58 screen and hwinfo screen in one printscreen
You know I can't do that yet :)
Instead ask OBR to post two pictures showing proper performance scaling from stock clocks to 4,3 GHz.
heh, or watch at Coolaler. Ok, few days to complete end of NDA :). But oficially, I watched much Gigabytes videos of Llano
30th JUNE not too long
SuperBiiz has a couple Processors listed in stock.Quote:
Originally Posted by Daveburt714
http://www.superbiiz.com/query.php?c...&s=fm1&x=0&y=0
Woo, finally we can spill the beans!
http://pclab.pl/zdjecia/artykuly/mbr...11_maxoced.png
Gigabyte video (A75-UD2H) with Llano and Crysis 2.
http://www.legitreviews.com/news/10998/
Can ir run Crysis?
--> Yeah baby.
Llano OC
CPU 2.9Ghz --> 3.64Ghz
GPU 600Mhz --> 840Mhz
DDR3 2240Mhz
3DMark Vantage performance --> P6136 / GPU 5226
For comparison:
Crysis 2 --> 40FPS+Quote:
HD6570 GPU 7314
HD5670 GPU 6466
GT240 GPU 5645
HD5570 GPU 4559
HD4670 GPU 4055
intel HD3000 GPU 1295 (i5 2500K)
HD5450 GPU 909
*Done in a i7 920 @3.6Ghz
http://www.neoseeker.com/Articles/Ha...70_6570/4.html
Reviews:
http://www.pcper.com/reviews/Graphic...e-Sandy-Bridge
http://www.guru3d.com/article/amd-a8-3850-apu-review/
http://www.tomshardware.com/reviews/...lano,2975.html
http://www.anandtech.com/show/4478/a...-overclocking]
wait for some more info/pics
Finally!
Reading them all :)
Its great to finally see some performance from these APUs, I've been watching them with interest and waiting.
However I also really like the idea of crossfiring the APU with the HD6670 as a cheap boost to the gaming performance.
This can be seen in the review here:
http://www.eteknix.com/motherboards/...d-review-1414/
I don't think I've read any other reviews which have crossfired the internal APU.
Also compared to other reviews gets a better overclock than most on the Asus board although too many volts.
AMD Liano A8-3850 + ASUS F1A75-M Pro @ 5.0 GHz (40*125MHz) On Air ambient 26c HyperPi32M 4Threads stable.
http://www.vmodtech.com/main/article...pro-review/11/
Attachment 116978
Gross mistake :))
Ooh, that's the board I ordered. Hopefully the ram will go higher than that. 40x multi though?Quote:
Originally Posted by Venom-Crusher
--Matt
That result is most probably wrong, as current bioses allow for changing multis upward, but it doesnt REALLY change them, only software reads it as higher, but real frequency is still the highest multi, so 29x.Quote:
Originally Posted by Venom-Crusher
lol, only 125x29 in real :)...no 5 GHz :)
It's a really mistake. I'm sorry for all.
seriously there are many many BS results out there.
Using some unorthodox means I tested with unlocked parts beyond the 47 limit at ref clock......
preety much LLanos limit was 5200 on ln2, voltage scaling was poor.
Anything far off from 5200 is BS
Not only is there multiplier bugs there is ref clock bugs........ref clock thinks it's changed but it's really not so some of those uber ram clocks and WR's some are claiming are BS. The program is being tricked.
Going to have to wait till software reads these parts correctly.
Avg clocks on air/water = 3600-3700 all at stock volts to.
Phase IIRC i tested around -40 on ln2, got you to 4.2 ish stock volts.
Avg ln2 clocks = 5000-5200 at 1.7v........higher pissed off chips also the jump in volts was only to gain 200 mhz.......cold scaled more than volts.
Avg ref clocks are much lower on many boards for boot making some of the speeds people are posting unrealistic for a 24/7 bootable rig.
Max avg ref clocks are 125ish unless we some some great strides in bios's, symptoms you will find booting high, lost HD in boot.
I could boot up to 185, but with no HDDs and no USB. That 160 result is bootable with Corsair Force but not with OCZ Agility :shrug:
I guess observing the performance is the only way to make sure you're running high.
http://www.tomshardware.co.uk/amd-a8...w-32222-7.html
Black Edition chips will be needed to see real potential I guess.
NICE one !!Quote:
Originally Posted by Venom-Crusher
I wish the local ASUS vendor have the board in stock earlier :(