the gpu are the same of 470? with cutted shader/bus?
Printable View
the gpu are the same of 470? with cutted shader/bus?
3DMark Vantage Performance
ASUS GTX 285 TOP
http://forum.amtech.com.vn/attachmen...1&d=1275042224
ASUS GTX 465 default
http://forum.amtech.com.vn/attachmen...1&d=1275042224
ASUS GTX 465 @ 650/840
http://forum.amtech.com.vn/attachmen...1&d=1275042224
ASUS GTX 465 @ 700/925
http://forum.amtech.com.vn/attachmen...1&d=1275042224
Devil May Cry 4 DX10. 1680*1050, AA=4X, Super High
ASUS GTX 285 TOP
http://forum.amtech.com.vn/attachmen...1&d=1275042224
ASUS GTX 465 default
http://forum.amtech.com.vn/attachmen...1&d=1275042224
ASUS GTX 465 @ 650/840
http://forum.amtech.com.vn/attachmen...1&d=1275042224
ASUS GTX 465 @ 700/925
http://forum.amtech.com.vn/attachmen...1&d=1275042224
Resident Evil 5 DX10. 1680*1050, AA=4X, Max Settings
ASUS GTX 285 TOP
http://forum.amtech.com.vn/attachmen...1&d=1275042224
ASUS GTX 465 default
http://forum.amtech.com.vn/attachmen...1&d=1275042224
ASUS GTX 465 @ 650/840
http://forum.amtech.com.vn/attachmen...1&d=1275042224
ASUS GTX 465 @ 700/925
http://forum.amtech.com.vn/attachmen...1&d=1275042224
Heaven Demo benchmark DX11. 1680*1050, AA=4X, AF=16X, Tessellation=OFF, Max Settings
ASUS GTX 285 TOP
http://forum.amtech.com.vn/attachmen...1&d=1275100815
ASUS GTX 465 default
http://forum.amtech.com.vn/attachmen...1&d=1275100815
ASUS GTX 465 @ 650/840
http://forum.amtech.com.vn/attachmen...1&d=1275100815
ASUS GTX 465 @ 700/925
http://forum.amtech.com.vn/attachmen...1&d=1275100815
Heaven Demo benchmark DX11. 1680*1050, AA=4X, AF=16X, Tessellation=moderate, Max Settings
ASUS GTX 465 default
http://forum.amtech.com.vn/attachmen...1&d=1275100815
ASUS GTX 465 @ 650/840
http://forum.amtech.com.vn/attachmen...1&d=1275100815
ASUS GTX 465 @ 700/925
http://forum.amtech.com.vn/attachmen...1&d=1275100815
Power consumption of the system includes GTX465 default and Core i7 965 @ 3.6GHz
idle
http://forum.amtech.com.vn/attachmen...1&d=1275100936
full load with Furmark
http://forum.amtech.com.vn/attachmen...1&d=1275100936
When the full load, power consumption of GTX465 is the same of HD5870.
thx bakalu :) awsome job! :D
I do not have HD5850, so I used ASUS Maxtrix HD 5870 to emulator HD5850, driver ATI 104a Preview.
...to be continued
At least GTX 465 will have a very good custom quiet cooler from the begining but i think that 239$-249$ , 5830' price should have been more realistic.
Gigabyte GTX 465
http://images10.newegg.com/NeweggIma...125-332-02.jpg
great job w/ the review!
You want to compare the performance of GTX465 and HD5850, I do not have HD5850, so I used ASUS Maxtrix HD 5870 to emulator HD5850, driver ATI 104a Preview. Some benchmark results are as follows
3DMark Vantage Performance
ASUS Maxtrix HD 5870 @ 725/1000
http://forum.amtech.com.vn/attachmen...1&d=1275215018
ASUS GTX 465 @ 700/925
http://forum.amtech.com.vn/attachmen...65-700-925.jpg
Crysis Warhead. 1680*1050, NoAA, Enthusiast DX10, ambush map
ASUS Maxtrix HD 5870 @ 725/1000
http://forum.amtech.com.vn/attachmen...cryis-5850.jpg
ASUS GTX 465 @ 700/925
http://forum.amtech.com.vn/attachmen...65-700-925.jpg
Call of Juarez DX10. 1680*1050, AA=4X Multi_sampling, Max Settings
ASUS Maxtrix HD 5870 @ 725/1000
http://forum.amtech.com.vn/attachmen...5-coj_5850.jpg
ASUS GTX 465 @ 700/925
http://forum.amtech.com.vn/attachmen...65-700-925.jpg
S.T.A.L.K.E.R Call of Pripyat DX11. 1680*1050, AA=4X, Max Settings, Tessellation=ON
ASUS Maxtrix HD 5870 @ 725/1000
http://forum.amtech.com.vn/attachmen...1&d=1275215363
ASUS GTX 465 @ 700/925
http://forum.amtech.com.vn/attachmen...65-700-925.jpg
Demo benchmark Dirt 2 DX11. 1680*1050, AA=4X, Ultra Settings. POST PROCESS=MEDIUM
ASUS Maxtrix HD 5870 @ 725/1000, DirectX 11
http://forum.amtech.com.vn/attachmen...dirt2-5850.jpg
ASUS GTX 465 @ 700/925, DirectX 11
http://forum.amtech.com.vn/attachmen...65-700-925.jpg
Benchmark Bad Company 2 DX11. I play the first scene. Use Fraps. 1680*1050, AA=4X, AF=16X, Max Settings
ASUS Maxtrix HD 5870 @ 725/1000
ASUS GTX 465 @ 700/925Quote:
2010-05-30 15:18:03 - BFBC2Game
Frames: 9722 - Time: 153999ms - Avg: 63.130 - Min: 46 - Max: 89
Benchmark Metro 2033. I play the first scene. Use Fraps. 1680*1050, NoAA, AF=16X, Very High, PhysX=ONQuote:
2010-05-28 1458 - BFBC2Game
Frames: 9406 - Time: 159798ms - Avg: 58.862 - Min: 44 - Max: 81
ASUS Maxtrix HD 5870 @ 725/1000, DirectX 9
ASUS GTX 465 @ 700/925, DirectX 9Quote:
2010-05-30 15:23:41 - metro2033
Frames: 10975 - Time: 246314ms - Avg: 44.557 - Min: 16 - Max: 89
ASUS Maxtrix HD 5870 @ 725/1000, DirectX 10Quote:
2010-05-28 1453 - metro2033
Frames: 8827 - Time: 235842ms - Avg: 37.428 - Min: 17 - Max: 76
ASUS GTX 465 @ 700/925, DirectX 10Quote:
2010-05-30 15:43:12 - metro2033
Frames: 8245 - Time: 230943ms - Avg: 35.701 - Min: 15 - Max: 72
ASUS Maxtrix HD 5870 @ 725/1000, DirectX 11Quote:
2010-05-28 1409 - metro2033
Frames: 7585 - Time: 228995ms - Avg: 33.123 - Min: 16 - Max: 70
ASUS GTX 465 @ 700/925, DirectX 11Quote:
2010-05-30 16:14:37 - metro2033
Frames: 5383 - Time: 242625ms - Avg: 22.187 - Min: 12 - Max: 38
Devil May Cry 4 DX10. 1680*1050, AA=4X, Super HighQuote:
2010-05-28 1406 - metro2033
Frames: 5128 - Time: 231864ms - Avg: 22.116 - Min: 13 - Max: 38
ASUS Maxtrix HD 5870 @ 725/1000
http://forum.amtech.com.vn/attachmen...1&d=1275216070
ASUS GTX 465 @ 700/925
http://forum.amtech.com.vn/attachmen...65-700-925.jpg
Resident Evil 5 DX10. 1680*1050, AA=4X, Max Settings
ASUS Maxtrix HD 5870 @ 725/1000
http://forum.amtech.com.vn/attachmen...1&d=1275216070
ASUS GTX 465 @ 700/925
http://forum.amtech.com.vn/attachmen...65-700-925.jpg
Heaven Demo benchmark DX11. 1680*1050, AA=4X, AF=16X, Tessellation=moderate, Max Settings
ASUS Maxtrix HD 5870 @ 725/1000
http://forum.amtech.com.vn/attachmen...1&d=1275216070
ASUS GTX 465 @ 700/925
http://forum.amtech.com.vn/attachmen...65-700-925.jpg
Aliens vs. Predator DirectX 11 Benchmark. 1680*1050, AA=4X, AF=16X, Tessellation=ON, Max Settings
ASUS Maxtrix HD 5870 @ 725/1000
ASUS GTX 465 @ 700/925Quote:
*DX11 Hardware Detected*
Using Video Settings from file <AvP_Benchmark_Config.txt>:
Resolution: 1680 x 1050
Texture Quality: 3
Shadow Quality: 3
Anisotropic Filtering: 16
SSAO: ON
Vertical Sync: OFF
DX11 Tessellation: ON
DX11 Advanced Shadows: ON
DX11 MSAA Samples: 4
Benchmark Summary:
Number of frames: 3258
Average Frame Time: 32.2ms
Average FPS: 31.1
Tomorrow I may have HD5850 and I will test all the games again.Quote:
*DX11 Hardware Detected*
Using Video Settings from file <AvP_Benchmark_Config.txt>:
Resolution: 1680 x 1050
Texture Quality: 3
Shadow Quality: 3
Anisotropic Filtering: 16
SSAO: ON
Vertical Sync: OFF
DX11 Tessellation: ON
DX11 Advanced Shadows: ON
DX11 MSAA Samples: 4
Benchmark Summary:
Number of frames: 3034
Average Frame Time: 34.6ms
Average FPS: 28.9
awesome review is awesome
Wow, I almost thought the GTX465 was POS, but after this review.... I might just sack F it and get me one if I can find it cheaply! I only game on an 20" LCD anyway. :D
nice review!
some thumbnails would have been nice instead of all those huge pics that somehow load very slowly... :D
mhhh the fact alone that you compare it to a gtx285 and have to mention that it DOES perform better is really all there is to say, isnt it? i mean yeah, it is faster, but the performance gain is so low that you have to point out its faster... :D
if somebody would switch your rig from a 285 to a 465 i dont think youd notice the difference at all...
and a 465 costs 300$... isnt that close to what gtx285 cards sold for a year ago? so basically you spend 300$ to get dx11 and be able to bench unigine and play 3 or 4 games with some additional special effects that are so minimal its hard to tell if they are enabled or not... now THIS is progress! :clap:
seriously... 300$ is way too high for this level of performance...
it should be 200$... and even then it wouldnt be all that great as a 5770 isnt exactly slow and costs 150$...
sorry for the threadcrap :P
very nice review, thanks a lot for all the time and effort! :toast:
move the piccies to another ftp man, it's taking aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaages to load :)
To compare the performance of ASUS GTX 465 @ 700/925 and ASUS HD 5850 @ 800/1150, GTX465 and HD5850 run stable at that clock without having to increase voltage, driver ATI 10.5a hotfix. Some benchmark results are as follows :
3DMark Vantage Performance
ASUS HD 5850 @ 800/1150
http://forum.amtech.com.vn/attachmen...1&d=1275356635
ASUS GTX 465 @ 700/925
http://forum.amtech.com.vn/attachmen...65-700-925.jpg
Crysis Warhead. 1680*1050, NoAA, Enthusiast DX10, ambush map
ASUS HD 5850 @ 800/1150
http://forum.amtech.com.vn/attachmen...1&d=1275356635
ASUS GTX 465 @ 700/925
http://forum.amtech.com.vn/attachmen...65-700-925.jpg
Call of Juarez DX10. 1680*1050, AA=4X Multi_sampling, Max Settings
ASUS HD 5850 @ 800/1150
http://forum.amtech.com.vn/attachmen...1&d=1275356635
ASUS GTX 465 @ 700/925
http://forum.amtech.com.vn/attachmen...65-700-925.jpg
S.T.A.L.K.E.R Call of Pripyat DX11. 1680*1050, AA=4X, Max Settings, Tessellation=ON
ASUS HD 5850 @ 800/1150
http://forum.amtech.com.vn/attachmen...1&d=1275356635
ASUS GTX 465 @ 700/925
http://forum.amtech.com.vn/attachmen...65-700-925.jpg
Demo benchmark Dirt 2 DX11. 1680*1050, AA=4X, Ultra Settings. POST PROCESS=MEDIUM
ASUS HD 5850 @ 800/1150, DirectX 11
http://forum.amtech.com.vn/attachmen...1&d=1275356635
ASUS GTX 465 @ 700/925, DirectX 11
http://forum.amtech.com.vn/attachmen...65-700-925.jpg
Benchmark Bad Company 2 DX11. I play the first scene. Use Fraps. 1680*1050, AA=4X, AF=16X, Max Settings
ASUS HD 5850 @ 800/1150
ASUS GTX 465 @ 700/925Quote:
2010-05-31 16:13:00 - BFBC2Game
Frames: 10247 - Time: 151026ms - Avg: 67.849 - Min: 44 - Max: 95
Benchmark Metro 2033. I play the first scene. Use Fraps. 1680*1050, NoAA, AF=16X, Very High, PhysX=ONQuote:
2010-05-28 1458 - BFBC2Game
Frames: 9406 - Time: 159798ms - Avg: 58.862 - Min: 44 - Max: 81
ASUS HD 5850 @ 800/1150, DirectX 9
ASUS GTX 465 @ 700/925, DirectX 9Quote:
2010-05-31 16:34:46 - metro2033
Frames: 10943 - Time: 228982ms - Avg: 47.790 - Min: 18 - Max: 95
ASUS HD 5850 @ 800/1150, DirectX 10Quote:
2010-05-28 1453 - metro2033
Frames: 8827 - Time: 235842ms - Avg: 37.428 - Min: 17 - Max: 76
ASUS GTX 465 @ 700/925, DirectX 10Quote:
2010-05-31 16:28:21 - metro2033
Frames: 8433 - Time: 225717ms - Avg: 37.361 - Min: 18 - Max: 80
ASUS HD 5850 @ 800/1150, DirectX 11Quote:
2010-05-28 1409 - metro2033
Frames: 7585 - Time: 228995ms - Avg: 33.123 - Min: 16 - Max: 70
ASUS GTX 465 @ 700/925, DirectX 11Quote:
2010-05-31 16:21:28 - metro2033
Frames: 5452 - Time: 229603ms - Avg: 23.745 - Min: 14 - Max: 37
Devil May Cry 4 DX10. 1680*1050, AA=4X, Super HighQuote:
2010-05-28 1406 - metro2033
Frames: 5128 - Time: 231864ms - Avg: 22.116 - Min: 13 - Max: 38
ASUS HD 5850 @ 800/1150
http://forum.amtech.com.vn/attachmen...1&d=1275356635
ASUS GTX 465 @ 700/925
http://forum.amtech.com.vn/attachmen...65-700-925.jpg
Resident Evil 5 DX10. 1680*1050, AA=4X, Max Settings
ASUS HD 5850 @ 800/1150
http://forum.amtech.com.vn/attachmen...1&d=1275356635
ASUS GTX 465 @ 700/925
http://forum.amtech.com.vn/attachmen...65-700-925.jpg
Heaven Demo benchmark DX11. 1680*1050, AA=4X, AF=16X, Tessellation=moderate, Max Settings
ASUS HD 5850 @ 800/1150
http://forum.amtech.com.vn/attachmen...1&d=1275356635
ASUS GTX 465 @ 700/925
http://forum.amtech.com.vn/attachmen...65-700-925.jpg
Aliens vs. Predator DirectX 11 Benchmark. 1680*1050, AA=4X, AF=16X, Tessellation=ON, Max Settings
ASUS HD 5850 @ 800/1150
ASUS GTX 465 @ 700/925Quote:
*DX11 Hardware Detected*
Using Video Settings from file <AvP_Benchmark_Config.txt>:
Resolution: 1680 x 1050
Texture Quality: 3
Shadow Quality: 3
Anisotropic Filtering: 16
SSAO: ON
Vertical Sync: OFF
DX11 Tessellation: ON
DX11 Advanced Shadows: ON
DX11 MSAA Samples: 4
Benchmark Summary:
Number of frames: 3589
Average Frame Time: 29.2ms
Average FPS: 34.2
HD5850 @ 800/1150 is much stronger than GTX465 @ 700/925, however HD5850 @ 800/1150 can not play DX11 Metro 2033 at resolution 1680*1050 .Quote:
*DX11 Hardware Detected*
Using Video Settings from file <AvP_Benchmark_Config.txt>:
Resolution: 1680 x 1050
Texture Quality: 3
Shadow Quality: 3
Anisotropic Filtering: 16
SSAO: ON
Vertical Sync: OFF
DX11 Tessellation: ON
DX11 Advanced Shadows: ON
DX11 MSAA Samples: 4
Benchmark Summary:
Number of frames: 3034
Average Frame Time: 34.6ms
Average FPS: 28.9
Some Asus GTX 465 can use accompanying software to unlock diabled cores and it performs very close to 470:eek::eek::eek:
http://www.chiphell.com/data/attachm...svcsxxvusn.gif
http://www.chiphell.com/data/attachm...dlxfvrm2rd.png
wow sooooo much info in this thread I had to take a break haha ... keep up the massive testing i had no idea the 465 was gonna put out those types of numbers
do you reach this settings by increasing voltage right?how much did you increase?with the asus software^Quote:
Originally Posted by bakalu
probably a stupid question, but will i get similar overclockability if I buy an EVGA GTX 465 instead of a ASUS GTX 465?
Probably, I have tested an INNO and an ASUS GTX465 (as used here) and found overclcoking performance to be similar to what has been posted here and other reviews on both (reference) cards.Quote:
Originally Posted by txtsd
http://farm5.static.flickr.com/4029/...b52578bc_b.jpg
I tried using the ASUS unlock tool on both of these cards and it hasn't worked on either. Perhaps ASUS is holding it back for a Matrix Version or something.
there are lot of informational channels which are providing the knowledge and information, but i was just visiting to this "web site" which is very informative and interested, so i like to visit as like the sites.