Meh I don't understand NVIDIA, if they want to make sure PhysX will live they should make sure it runs on both NVIDIA and ATI cards, it's just a question about when, another physics standard overtakes PhysX.
Printable View
Meh I don't understand NVIDIA, if they want to make sure PhysX will live they should make sure it runs on both NVIDIA and ATI cards, it's just a question about when, another physics standard overtakes PhysX.
i could see the licensing on that, but this its running on an NV card. should intel stop their nics from working on amd systems or how about amd stops NV gpus from working on NV or maybe better MS bans all non microsoft peripherals from windowsQuote:
Originally Posted by RPGWiZaRD
Quote:
Originally Posted by blindbox
You guys totally missed this part of my post! Everyone is thinking too deep.
Why is nvidia shooting itself in the face?
becouse for phsyX to adopted as an integral game component and not some BS marketing tool it needs a high adoption rate, by deoptimizing the pc and actively stopping their cards from being used as a PPU they are stopping adoption so when people need physics for a game they go for havoc since it has proper cpu support.Quote:
Originally Posted by nsegative
think of it like movies u can use a dvd (no physics or agea style phsyX cpu), an enhanced video dvd (NV phsyX with gpu) or a blu ray (havoc, u need a cpu but it has good adoption)
This is just pathetic. NVIDIA, burn in hell with your infinite idiocy. One more reason to hate them, fu**in' morons. This actually confirms that their PR is being run my chimpanzees and orangutans. No, wait. That's discriminatory to the apes. Their PR is led by retarded amoebas. Yeah, that's more like it.
This is like cutting your leg off to prevent infection instead curing it with antibiotics. They rather cut off a small margin of income created by existing Radeon users than eat their fat pride and let those few users use PhysX. Because no one is stupid enough to sell their HD5850 and wait for (still) non existing GTX 460 just to get dumb PhysX lmao.
It just doesn't compute.
LOL! Gullible to the Xtreme.Quote:
Originally Posted by Andrew LB
With any luck, games will start using the OpenCL supporting Bullet physics engine. Then it will run on all cuda/opencl supporting GPUs, and we can all be happy. I think Havoc is working on OpenCL stuff too?
Essentially, I expect these open platforms to eventually win over PhysX, however much money nV throw at developers to use it.
Bah!! it looks like the bomb already exploded in their own hand :ROTF:
They opened a can of Whoop-ass!
So if i understand correctly, Nvidia doesn't want you to run physics if you buy any Nvidia card and combine it with a 785G mobo? If this is true, it is quite sad....
You bring up a good point! Does this time bomb kick in if you have integrated ATI graphics on your motherboard? Somebody has to have tested this.Quote:
Originally Posted by BoredByLife
This, cant stop laughing at the naivetyQuote:
Originally Posted by Final8ty
Ok, I don't know where to start. First of all, ATI was offered Physx support if they paid licensing fees to nVidia. If they would do that, nVidia would help ATI run Physx on their Radeons. ATI, however, chose not to. Now how is it "theft of their technology" to BUY a nVidia product, which says it supports Physx on the BOX, to actually use it? It's not like the hacks are allowing you to run Physx on the Radeon cards. You are paying nVidia for a card, which supports Physx. Sounds fair to me you actually get to use Physx, no matter what other hardware you might be running in your PC.Quote:
Originally Posted by Andrew LB
They already work together splendidly. This hack shows that. And it was possibly with older drivers without any hack. It not working together is 100% an artificial lock made by nVidia.Quote:
Originally Posted by Andrew LB
You're stating something different here. You are saying in your example "to use with my nV card". That's exactly the point. Ofcourse it's only fair to pay nVidia for using Physx, but people are already doing that by buying their cards. It would be totally unfair and theft of technology if the hack allowed you to use Physx on a Radeon card, but it does not.Quote:
Originally Posted by Andrew LB
Add in the fact that people who bought the original Ageia Physx card can't even use theirs anymore, even though it's 100% possible to still use it by using this hack, and it's very clear nVidia is at fault here. Just think about it.
Why do ATI need to pay for Physx when they arent putting it on their graphics cards? Common sense fail?Quote:
Originally Posted by Andrew LB
If people buy an Nvidia card to use Physx, they have paid in full to use a graphics card with Physx. ATI dont have to pay Nvidia because their customers also want to purchase Nvidia products for Physx.
Its funny though, Nvidia only lose sales and damage their reutaton from this. People using ATI setups arent exactly going to ditch their ATI cards just to use Physx, which is what Nvidia are trying to make them do.
I can live without it. The only game I play that supports Physx is bugged and crashes like crazy with it enabled according to other users (Sacred 2).
IMO Intel and AMD should just stop Nvidia cards from working on their chipsets altogether, and not provide them with the rights to make their own chipsets as Intel already do. Thats pretty much doing the same thing that Nvidia want to do with Physx.
Agree 100%. See how their own medicine tastes. intel basically threw nvidia a bone by allowing sli to work on x58, right? Now make it not work. Or make it so slow its worthless. I think intel can manage a way to make that work. ;)Quote:
Originally Posted by bhavv
I don't know why the ftc is allowing stuff like this if it was obviously against the law for intel to do the same things to AMD.
^^ Is it illegal under fair trading to buy an Nvidia GPU clearly advertised with supporting Physx, that doesnt work if you have hardware from either ATI or Intel?
I would think it is. AMD should definately give Nvidia such a shove and disable support for their cards on AMD motherboards. Let them see exactly what its like.
First off is PissX worth the money?
When I game my eyes are focused looking at my next move or action, not staring at how good a dust cloud looks or the way cans fall off a table, google or photochop is a lot cheaper to use to see the things, like pretty pictures.
Dont get me wrong PissX looks great on a cartoon game like spongebob or maplestory if your into those games.
I would better understand nvidia's move if they were still making chipsets, but for the price of PissX these days they should add a pack of lube with each card and call them FTF* editions*(F*#% the Fan).
i think they should send a eye gouge'in ninja over to anyones house that wants to use phx on any brand card.
but thats just me
Talk about completely missing the point?Quote:
Originally Posted by cowie
People want to buy *NVIDIA* cards to use Physx, not a card by any brand to run it.
Can anyone who doesnt get this care to explain what is wrong with adding an Nvidia card to a PC to use a physx accelerator? People would be using Nvidia hardware for Physx, not just 'any brand'.
i did not miss the point at all
it seems many miss the point by trying to run nv phx with an ati card installed no matter if they have an nv card to do it.
Honestly, after seeing what CPU accelerated Havok physics could do in Just Cause 2, I'm totally unconvinced that GPU accelerated physics should even be on the table anymore. That goes for PhysX, OpenCL apps, etc, etc.
Why would I want the rendering power of my GPU compromised by doing physics calculations while my 4-8 core processor sits there twiddling its thumbs on most of its cores? I don't give two hoots if the GPU can calculate fluid dynamics, rigid body, AI, and so on more efficiently when my processor can do it inefficiently and actually USE the threads it isn't utilizing.
I wonder if Charlie is going to write anything about this one? I get the impression there is more to it then what's told.
Well, potentially a GPU (even an older one) could do way more simultaneous physics objects than a CPU. So if you have a random 8800gt lying around, it would make a way more efficient physics calculator than your new top of the line CPU.Quote:
Originally Posted by SKYMTL
But on the other hand, current implementations of physics features don't really have that many physics objects to make it necessary. I'm guessing it's got something to do with most of the market not having any kind of consistent hardware physics solution. So most will design games in mind with the CPU still being able to do physics. Unless, of course, they don't like money or something.
NVIDIA are just idiots, though this kind of behaviour does not surprise me, considering the past stunts they have pulled.