AMD Bulldozer 16core @ 3ghz benchmarked (EDIT: confirmed fake!)

Shame its a fake. But 28 threads and 16 cores does sound too good to be true.

The AVX instruction set was the first thing that hit my eyes. CPU-Z can't even recognize AES yet.

And then the 28 MBytes Level 3 Cache, as Chri$ch pointed out.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Vozer

The AVX instruction set was the first thing that hit my eyes. CPU-Z can't even recognize AES yet.

And then the 28 MBytes Level 3 Cache, as Chri$ch pointed out.

---

Exactly, CPU-Z doesn't have that capability yet :rofl:.

The 28MB is probably supposed to be due to the probe filter being enabled. Nice guess though.

Also, John Fruehe says this is obviously photoshopped. Of course he can't say what's real and what't not, but I think his response would have been a bit different if it was real, like how he responded to Magny Cours getting out.

24 threads at 3.16GHz? Do want :D You messed up badly with the L1 Data Cache though :p:

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by LOE

cmon people, you all know its real :clap:

---

Only in your wet dreams. :rofl:

Come one people use your brain, 1 1/2 year before rumored release time?

That never was the case, if it would have benn September 2010, it would be far more believable. But not now. :yepp:

franck confirmed its fake... cpuz currently cant detect amd 32nm ;)
plus some other things, but i wont mention them to HELP people make a better fake soon :D

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Hornet331

Only in your wet dreams. :rofl:

Come one people use your brain, 1 1/2 year before rumored release time?

That never was the case, if it would have benn September 2010, it would be far more believable. But not now. :yepp:

---

well originally bulldozer was supposed to be out EARLY 2009...

I hate to see it's fake lol.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by LOE

I was being sarcastic actually

I am amazed it was posted in the first place, it's a joke and not even a well made one

---

really? then how would a real cpuz shot of a bulldozer 16core look like? ;)

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by saaya

really? then how would a real cpuz shot of a bulldozer 16core look like? ;)

---

Who cares!? It definitely needed a check before being posted as news :yepp:

amazing that someone would go to this much trouble to do this lol

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by LowRun

Who cares!? It definitely needed a check before being posted as news :yepp:

---

Fake shot is not the news you are waiting for, but its news nonetheless if it spreads around the net.

Give it a rest people, its fake lets move on.

Not really surprised, it is coming from semiaccurate afterall.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Russian

Not really surprised, it is coming from semiaccurate afterall.

---

No, its from the OCWB forums.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by w0mbat

No, its from the OCWB forums.

---

Why did OP link to Semiaccurate forums? i didnt bother clicking so i didnt know the primary souce.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by cpuz

Hello guys,

cpuz (even version 1.52.3) does not know any 32 nm AMD processor, so it is impossible that it displays "32 nm".
Besides, the cache associativities are missing ... and finally, the program would not display "AVX" in the instructions sets (it reads avx feature but does not display it).

:-(

---

Man ... Some people really like faking your application. May be we can make a CRC system of what is display and avoid anymore of those ... I ll call you tomorrow!
adding a CRC that can be check online out of a screen shot would stop those fake for ever.
It would save some pain for AMD and us to have to answer all of those crazy emails all the time. (For the screens that are not "certified")

Francois

yeah, something like the SPI validator :D

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Drwho?

Man ... Some people really like faking your application. May be we can make a CRC system of what is display and avoid anymore of those ... I ll call you tomorrow!
adding a CRC that can be check online out of a screen shot would stop those fake for ever.
It would save some pain for AMD and us to have to answer all of those crazy emails all the time. (For the screens that are not "certified")

Francois

---

Hello François,
This is what validation is made for.
Serious screenshots include the validation ID :up:

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by saaya

really? then how would a real cpuz shot of a bulldozer 16core look like? ;)

---

If your connections would be good enough you can just fly to dresden and do whatever testing needed on Bulldozer :up:

with enough paper signs off course :D