crap there's vl4s...:shakes:
Printable View
crap there's vl4s...:shakes:
Good article on Colder NS6 flow rates. LINK
Mine dont look like the NS6's.
As i said you can get a very large inner chamber version, only problems is its not threaded, and as i said it looks uber ugly:
http://i125.photobucket.com/albums/p...a/IMG_1321.jpg
http://i125.photobucket.com/albums/p...a/IMG_1322.jpg
http://i125.photobucket.com/albums/p...a/IMG_1323.jpg
so who has got VL4's??
I've got one set of VL4's. Would have two sets, if P-PC's didn't screw my order up and send me two more females. :shakes: They're freakin' beasts. Like a big roll of nickels, and almost the same weight. Here's a side-by-side with a BP 1/2" fitting. :D
Edit: About 8.5cm long, when coupled like that. Although you need a couple extra cm to make room for them to be pulled apart.
Attachment 96469
That is BIG! What is the overall length of that Q/D?
We didn't release VL4s with g1/4 treading initially because the largest ID g1/4 can handle is ~3/8 so it seemed a bit contradictory to put g1/4 thread on a 5/8 shutoff valve.
Would you prefer g3/8 threading on the shutoff valve if we made g3/8 to g1/4 adapter available, or just g1/4 on the nozzles even though it would reduce the performance?
Just about everyone here uses G1/4 and 1/2" to 3/8" ID tubing so g3/8 adapters would just add extra cost for users.
Dean do you have VL4s with 3/8,5/8 compression fittings (have not found them) as that solution would work for me . . . .and I will be needing it in a next couple months. If not then I need a threaded solution be it G 3/8 or G 1/4. Will you guys be able to help me in that time frame?
I understand... but its like putting 1" exhaust on a 5.0. :confused: We can do it and we may, but it kind of confuses me personally.
I don't think 3/8ID VL4s will be available. If you're using 3/8 then you should see little to no restriction with the VL3s. I would bet that we will have some kind of threaded option available within the next couple months. :)Quote:
Originally Posted by DarthBeavis
By offering them with the compression fittings attached alread aren't you doing the same thing? Don't the compression fitting get narrower than 1/2" ID themselves?
Also, it's not the smallest diameter that defines flow rate by temselves, but for how long water has to flow through small diameters which defines how much pressure drop there is.
So even if the fitting has a lower diameter than the QD, the larger ID on the QD will still help flow, especially since the QD does have more restriction than a comparable piece of tubing with the same diameter (due to the QD having a shutoff mechanism which hinders flow). So even though the ID of the VL4 is 1/2" it's still not the same as havin a comparable piece of tubing in there, it will cause about the same pressure drop as putting a piece of 3/8"-7/16" tubing inside a loop that otherwise uses 1/2" tubing. So the ID of the QD would have to be even larger than the tubing for it to not cause a pressure drop (compared to a piece of tubing ofequal length).
PS: I like the VL3s very much and if you decide to make VL4s with female G1/4 threading you can be sure that I'm gonna buy them, and I bet a lot of other people will too. In fact, I'm pretty sure that those will sell better than any other of your quick disconnects. People have always been complaining that there are no good QDs with female G1/4 threading, and if the best QDs (pressure drop wise) out there would be available with G1/4 threading no one would buy NS6 CPCs anymore.
wahahaha... look at the Quick Discconect fever i caused on this forum.
I'll be putting a pair of vl4s on each of my loops over the weekend when i switch back to my evga board. The only issue i have noticed is that even though i can get the tubing over the 1/2" barb, the tube is too thin walled for the compression cap to actually work, so i'll end up having to use clamps. I'm using 7/16ID/5/8OD masterklear tubing.