Wow, I never thought the 350 was going to be more restrictive than a Supreme.
Printable View
Wow, I never thought the 350 was going to be more restrictive than a Supreme.
hmmm i see where your getting at with this statement.
ummmm OP, how is the supreme less restrictive then the D-tek V2 on a dual pump?
:rofl:
I think WL is correct.. You need to pull everything off the loop but the block and pump solo. Your last 2 graphs make no sense..
I have the 655+ EK X top on the loop...will post some numbers
I just added the 655+xtop
wow 2 pumps and it still can't break 1.5GPM w/ 480gtx!!!
that koolance block is hella restrictive, but I wonder at what GPM it reaches it's peak efficiency before diminishing returns.
Needs temperature results
If flowrate is a concern, we also have the CPU-345 available. On our product pages we also supply a flow-rate to pressure drop graphs as well.
http://www.koolance.com/water-coolin...u-350ac_o0.gif
http://www.koolance.com/water-coolin...u-345at_o0.gif
+1. ANY tests such as flow only matter as far as they impact temps. I can make a loop that will blow away anyone's loop here in terms of flow . . .the downside is that it would be a loop of the pump inlet to outlet with one piece of tubing. It would not cool the CPU block ;)
Hats off to the OP. Please add to your great testing bud!
i'll search my emails..then pm you the link, i'll include the fittings that you need also....
oh yeah temps on i7 will come when my i7 comes..newegg says thursday...
Great post, thanks HondaCity...very informative....
I wonder where Swiftech GTZ would fall on this graph (b/n Fuzion and Supreme maybe?)
@anzial yes very close to that..if you interpolate martins data it would be in between the ek supreme and the fusion....
Great post. I would have like to have seen the Aqua Di.
DTek Gfx2 + 355 + xspc top + 480gtx will be added today
DTek Gfx2 + 355 + xspc top + 480gtx added today
+ Dtek fusionv2 + Gfx2 + 480gtx + 355 + xspc top