i think this CPU is "golden sample"
Printable View
i think this CPU is "golden sample"
It will be a golden sample, if we see some SPi runs ... ;) Till then, it's more like a BS sample ;)
very nice cpu from AMD
If more people would start overclocking AMD now, sure we would see more records. 95% of overclockers here are using Intel, so most AMD chips with great overclocking potential will never see any overclocking at all.Quote:
Originally Posted by George_o/c
thisQuote:
Originally Posted by Kasparz
considering I had an ES Phenom I which clocked remarkable better than most retails I somehow doubt the score...not to mention that no matter what I tried I could never validate the phenom with 4GHZ+ on CPUz even it was fine in windows idling. All my validations where corrupted and I tried it more than 20 times :( So this does look like some bug (maybe).
When you were overclocking, was the RAM on single channel?:rolleyes:Quote:
Originally Posted by SoF
didn't made a big difference while I was testing back in the days so I used DC. But still 500MHZ+ seems like an impossible gain with SC. and just to make it clear: i don't want to call it a wrong result without further information but it should be allowed to question some things ;)
Couldnt agree more, that results looks way to high to be true, its almost 400mhz higher than most known valid 9950 clocksQuote:
Originally Posted by SoF
Any news on that chip ?
Quote:
Originally Posted by SoF
If there is no benchmarks, and no news of any kind I'd say it's a bugged validation:DQuote:
Originally Posted by George_o/c
This is like getting a 7.2ghz E8600... I bet people would wonder if a validation was all you'd get:p:
AMD CPU-Z record from China and no any other benches = 95% fake for me. Those guys months ago did exacly the same with 6400+, cheating.
No prizes for guessing why you posted :p:Quote:
Athlon X2 6400+ @ 4299MHz - AMD FREQUENCY WORLD RECORD
I've got question, can I see some pictures from this party or screens with lower mhz ?
I mean, even in times when intel is much better than amd, if you do high mhz or good pi on amd probably you'll show it. I have seen nothing which can be link together with it. Show it, prove it and than I'll believe it :D
look here, you have got all what you want and what you want to know about the fastest k8 [;
http://forum.purepc.pl/Ekstremalne-P...d-t261938.html
you don't have to understand polish language, only look at screens :D
If I don't even had any amd cpu that wasn't funny for me. Ask ripping.org crew about it.Quote:
Originally Posted by Oj101
I really don't think that Masell posted because he felt intimidated as far as his WR is concerned ;)Quote:
Originally Posted by Oj101
We should just, play fair :)
Never thought it`s possible. Well done massman.
Wow.. amazing speed. Got to bring out my 9950 and try on some LN2. If I can get a suicide at 4+, that would be good to me :)
Ton
This craaaaaaaaazy overclock is not Pieter's, he just created a thread about it ;) A chinese guy did that ...Quote:
Originally Posted by WaterFlex
Quote:
Originally Posted by MaSell
Hey hey hey, note the :p: I used? It was said as a joke:yepp:Quote:
Originally Posted by George_o/c
I can't believe it =.=
This the world recorder sets record in E8600.
Because the information of this person is not found, I am interested very much.
I think we have a cheater among us: http://valid.x86-secret.com/show_oc.php?id=454936 :mad:
Yes me too , but it's possible my ex E8600 (dead now) a make 6801mhz (i have see but not valid) maybe better with my Golden Chips Q822A435 (i wait the good Biostar Tpower i45 now :) )Quote:
Originally Posted by Donbe
World Record :D
Who is that? I wouldn't call cheat yet... How did you find it? Was it posted anywhere? It might be a bug which he uploaded to see if it would validate?