SPi 1M = fail
wP 32M = fail
benches that speed up with processing power are transient at best. IMHO both of those benches have had their time.
Printable View
SPi 1M = fail
wP 32M = fail
benches that speed up with processing power are transient at best. IMHO both of those benches have had their time.
lol. Anyone who is a true computer enthusiast will look at more benchmarks than just superpi. That and you'd know that superpi is also dependent on CPU caching. Obvious intel's chips would do better. Look at other benchmarks for a more objective idea of how a chip performs.
Interesting tech article though.
Great reading, and I'm on your side, reading those 4 pages there was VERY little that didn't made sense to me.Quote:
Originally Posted by SparkyJJO
SuperPI is only fun to run just to check your score, and by increasing speeds and/ore decreasing latencies you can quickly check your new score.Quote:
Originally Posted by gallag
It's fun for a personal pov and eventually to see, in this case, how Deneb improved from Agena. Then still the results, and especially the actual context of that result, is very questionable... very.
Or to go short, the program is useless in 99.99% of the times. And of course AMD users use this tool as well, it still ain't a legit way to decide that Intel is any better than AMD or any other stupid comparison. It's almost like NASA benching their server clusters vs IBM with 3DMark01, the result tells nothing of how the actual server clusters perform or what so ever.
Cleaning the thread, re-open for business in a few minutes.
edit - re-opened.
All posts by Chad Boga removed, all replies removed.
I almost forgot what we are talking about here...Back on topic shal we
Thanks, Mr Evil! It kinda wobbled off track.:DQuote:
Originally Posted by STEvil
You're my hero:up:Quote:
Originally Posted by STEvil
Awesome to take a bit of time to clean it up:D