HD4850 3x CrossfireX First tried

Some better cooler is coming with vgpu? :D:p: Come on,give us something more :D

nice scores but how come that "masterchorch" beat your 06 score with 2 cards?

So come to update for 4x CrossfireX HD4850 and system on setup same as first time but cpu freq on 2k3 is lower than first time about 100MHz because my room temp higher on testing :) and my memory timing change to 2T from 1T because my cellshock it dead :( , well for GFX link on CF are 16x+4x+16x+4x come to see some impressive results from 4xCF :D

http://www.overclockzone.com/zolkorn...e/IMG_7272.jpg

2k3:eek:
http://www.overclockzone.com/zolkorn...3_4x4850CF.png

2k5
http://www.overclockzone.com/zolkorn...5_4x4850CF.png

2k6
http://www.overclockzone.com/zolkorn...6_4x4850CF.png

Vantage Performance Preset
http://www.overclockzone.com/zolkorn...n_4x4850CF.png

Vantage Entry Preset
http://www.overclockzone.com/zolkorn...n_4x4850CF.png

looking good for price and performance :up:

Oh wow ,,

last update is Great bro, :up:

setup looks really sweet.., nice job and we preciate the effort You put in! keep it up! :-)

That's just great Zol ! :up: Incredible 03 score, 05's looking good too ;)

what i still dont understand is 3d06 scores.

4x4850 665/1060 get 26000 something on a quad @ 4,5ghz

I get :

1x4850 670/1080 - 13000 something on a 6420 @ 3,3ghz


Maybe iam noobish but comapared it really doesnt impress me.

waiting for 4870 quad :)

Very interesting.. this will prove very hard to beat, especially that 03 score. Nice job Zolkorn :up:

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by thomas66

what i still dont understand is 3d06 scores.

4x4850 665/1060 get 26000 something on a quad @ 4,5ghz

I get :

1x4850 670/1080 - 13000 something on a 6420 @ 3,3ghz


Maybe iam noobish but comapared it really doesnt impress me.

---

06 doesn't scale 1:1 with the addition of GPUs. 26k is pretty nice for what is effectively a stock run. Now.. to achieve 30k with 2 cards :cool:

Another problem is the setup is being bottlenecked by PCI-E 4X and will limit the cards that are getting a 16 lane PCI-E. The last 2 PCI-E 16X slots only have 4 lanes to them. What will be better would be 4 PCI-E 16X slots with all haveing 8 lanes.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by SnipingWaste

Another problem is the setup is being bottlenecked by PCI-E 4X and will limit the cards that are getting a 16 lane PCI-E. The last 2 PCI-E 16X slots only have 4 lanes to them. What will be better would be 4 PCI-E 16X slots with all haveing 8 lanes.

---

For this reason a 2x CF system may actually be just as fast or faster han a 3x system.

Heres a review about all that: http://www.tweaktown.com/articles/14...ghz/index.html