Q6600 vs E8400 vs Q9450

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Leeghoofd

Go wolfie Mitra and in case you don't opt for SLI bundle it with a good P35 chipset or X48 depending on ya budget ( you already saved 100 dollars on the CPU )

---

Thanks for the reply :D

So.. X38 is not an option? P35 is always a better solution than X38?

I love the 790i ULtra SLI motherboards, like the EVGA. They are beautifull, but they are also too expensive. 345€ :shocked: :shakes:

I could buy an Asus Rampage (new) or some other motherboard used (cheaper :D ). Is X38 so bad? Because many people are selling them, so it's easy to get one, like the Asus Maximus Formula or the Abit Quad GT.

Evga mobo's have terrible Droop on the mobo so you would have to set about 0.1 over the required voltage... Asus, Gigabyte mobo's and DFI have a calibration there giving a smoother voltage... I wouldn't step on X38 as X48 is an improved version that's has better features in the bios and requires less voltage to get the same perforamnce level and they aren't more expensive then the X38... and you atalking superexpensive DDR3 here... for most users a no go and I held back my P5E3 premium mobo buy for RAM prices to drop...

If you would stick with a single card for a year I wouldn't even consider a Nforce based mobo

Just in case you came down on the Q9450 end of this debate and are looking for one if you go to the Microcenter front page you'll find a deal for the OEM Q9450 at the top of the page. Click on it and you'll get in your cart for $350 and a coupon for -$50 to bring it down to $300.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by gundamit

Just in case you came down on the Q9450 end of this debate and are looking for one if you go to the Microcenter front page you'll find a deal for the OEM Q9450 at the top of the page. Click on it and you'll get in your cart for $350 and a coupon for -$50 to bring it down to $300.

---

Thanks, but that store is from US and I live in Europe ;)

Leeghoofd thanks for the tip. I think I will buy an Asus Rampage... Am I doing a good choice? Or is there anything I should know about this MB?

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by adamsleath

dual now, quad later...for games.

---

Agreed with the above poster.

One year of lifetime estimated, i'd still get a dual.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by DerekT

You have opinions that you state as fact. That is an aborted method of discussion.

Such discussion is best left to the "Special Education Classes" and of which you seem to excel in.

---

Try as you might, you won't be doing any convincing that 3.8 is a good overclock for an e8400, no matter how much sweet talking you do(special ed, heh:)

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Leeghoofd

So you think it's fair to compare a 4.5Ghz E8400 with a 4ghz Quad... it's like Q9300 is faster clock for clock as the Q6600 as some member stated ( I read the X labs review and I think it's totally biassed ) at the start of this thread... yeah it runs 100mhz faster and has higher bandwith due to 333FSB... if you want to compare you have to do it CLOCK for CLOCK so same multi, same FSB... how else would you do it... doesn't sound reasonable at all.

---

It's realistic, and it's the question at hand; go with a higher clocking e8400 or a quad for more cores.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by keiths

Try as you might, you won't be doing any convincing that 3.8 is a good overclock for an e8400, no matter how much sweet talking you do(special ed, heh:)

---

I'm one of those people you were talking about. I'm pissed about my 3.85 because I bought this processor with full intent to run it at 4.0 24/7. As fast as it is like this, I'm still disappointed. I think anyone can run any batch E8400 at 3.8 with a capable board.