i've managed 464fsb out of my 680i and q6600.. i think it needs more fsb voltage... but it only goes to 1.5! gay... :(
i've managed 464fsb out of my 680i and q6600.. i think it needs more fsb voltage... but it only goes to 1.5! gay... :(
3Dmark01 score at 4.05Ghz
auto:
http://bbs.unihw.com/attachments/for...JCaat3QPkz.jpg
overclk to 864/1323
http://bbs.unihw.com/attachments/for...i751C3iLO8.jpg
is the 9800GTS 2gb a dual chip card aswell as the GX2?
I want one!
Are these cards released on the 18th of march together with 790i ? Nvidia better catch up in that case with it's drivers.... but I'm kindda liking the 2300mhz on the ram of the 9800GTX...
Btw, VR-Zone has the new drivers for XP and Vista on their website for the GX2 and GTX, Driver Version 174.40 and 174.51 i think, Once someone mods the inf, I'm going to make a public news post.
New Forceware 174.40 & 174.51 For GeForce 9800 GX2 & 9800 GTX :
http://vr-zone.com/articles/Forcewar..._GTX/5646.html
:p: .
Well specs are not everything you know. Look at the 9600. These cards will probably surprise everyone.
Well, they sure surprised many with the sneaky "overclocking-via-the-PCIe-bus-without-reflecting-it-in-drivers-or-tools"-function it incorporated which caused many review cards to be unstable and fail even simple overclocks (since they were already overclocked by 10-15% depending on the current PCIe-clock). In essense they're shrunk, overclocked and very slightly tweaked 8600GTS's (or practically half a G92 8800GTS). If they hadn't cheated with that PCIe-bus clock trick the 9600GT would be a compelling mid-range card right below the 8800GT. As it is it feels shoddy to me. In fact, the whole 9-series feels kind of unnecessary since they're essentially G92's. They should've used a different nomenclature like 8900GT/GTS/GTX or something, not jumped to series-9 because they're not a generation ahead, just slight updates (shrinks, higher clocks) of G92's.