What is the cache subsystem of Nehalem ? ( L1 size ? and is there an 8MB shared L2? )
Printable View
No it is for all :rolleyes:
Let me remind you of a Nehalem board for normal people.
http://img219.imageshack.us/img219/4...6356598xy6.jpg
This thread will be closed... pr0n isnt allowed on XS...
qpi sounds stupid...
massive package... looks impressive :slobber:
looks nice i hope it will overclock great
Considering theres only 6 weeks to the spring IDF we can expect to see a good few leaks from partners in the upcoming weeks before we get an in depth presentation at the big show.
its rather simple, instead of intel manufacturing non QP and non triple channel ddr3 they will just use the chips that "fail" which takes time to accumulate enough to supply the market. It always works that way, all manufacturers will spin for the best silicon and parts that don't meet the cut will trickle down to supply the mainstream........nvidia,ati and amd all do this.....
Right now I'm willing to bet that intel is only manufacturing QX quads, failed cache's = regular quads, failed cores = core 2 Xtremes, failed cache and cores = c2d, failed c2d cache = c2 celerons, failed c2d cores = single core celerons..............It's just a big domino effect, $hit rolls down hill.............
triple channel :O
Interesting. I'd like to see the pricing and clock speeds--I highly doubt that this'll be a "Phenom" type of launch, as Intel has these samples that seem to be doing very well and running smoothly. I think it's likely that we won't get much OC out of these things in first and second steppings, though it'll get better like the Core 2 chips did.
Okay TriChannel DDR, since it'll have enough bandwith maybe they now make an effort to lower latencies?!
And about the boy or girl discussion, well the board may be the boy here but it's sort of senseless anyway since the chip package has no sockets, so it's actually neuterly or whatchamacallit...
But back to topic, wow! Me wants!
Looks like Photoshop :shrug:
Where can i buy one?:shrug:
No way for Q4 2008. Do you believe that? Intel is winning the game right now. There's no need to rush.
Q4 2008 for very few chips, real availability (you'll still have to coordinate NewEgg raids) in Q1 2009. Good timing, I think. I'll be due for a new system in Q3 or Q4 2009--though I'll probably go DP for that system.
http://sunnytalkstech.blogspot.com/2...ls-leaked.html
sums everything up nicely
Lynnfield and Havendale have no QPI because they have nothing to talk to with it. The memory controller and northbridge are all integrated on die. The only external things that the chips talk to is the memory and the Ibex Peak PCH that does all the normal southbridge tasks.
1. Intel makes much more money and creates more orders of following products by making a strong showing in the server market and the enthusiast market. It also takes a bit longer to validate to the server market and that process will drive most of the changes in prodruct revisions as it is the most sensitive to errata.
2. DDR2 can do dual channel, triple channel or any numbers of channels. the recent change is not due to the shift to DDR3, but the limitation of the current memory controller architecture. The new IMC's have been setup to deal with more channels.
Havendale is dual core. No 775 support, and only one i know of is MP servers with FB-DDR2
nope all of them have IMC, some only have 2 channels, and not all of them need QPI
Not reallly, for nehalem everything is pretty much it's own product just binned to run at different speeds. Sure some of the failed quad chips may end up down lower, but we would much rather make 200 quality dual cores on a wafer as a seperate product, then count on having a product that only has 100 on a wafer to have lots of bad chips. wafer space is expensive real estate.
No, Americans don't just name stuff like that after Women. But they are just as in old English are gender specific. Tanks aren't named after Women but former Generals.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Patton_tank
Even older tanks like the first was the Stuart, Next Grant before Pershing. I was an Armor Crewman in the Army 19 Echo.
Ships are name after either Admirals, Presidents or folks important to the Navy. ALMOST None have strictly Female names. Most Aircraft get their names from creatures either Birds or Prey, are Mean Cats 90%. Helos are name from American Indian tribes like Apache, Arapaho, Sioux and others like Ranger. By gender a ship is Female though, like she was a good ship.
I think, or at least what I understood, was more the pronoun (as you touched on near the end with mention of gender). Re-reading my post, I see I was unclear in that.
Example.
North American
"Hey, nice benching rig!"
"Yup, she's a beaut."
Russian
"The Red October will be central to our plans to defect."
"Yes, he will need to be run optimally for us to succeed."
To rephrase my question, do Russians "predominantly" use the pronoun "he" to describe "man toys" as outlined in the Red October novel?
so big CPU...
OK Gender Specific my bad too. We have Germans here who can go into a lot of Detail like Kids being neutral, ship, bridge being feminine and so on, it affects their articles like; is, a, an and etc.. it came from from old English like the and thou, Die, Der, Den and so on. Maybe a Processor would be Male while the Whole computer might might be Female?
.......too confusing!
We need language benchmarks.........stat! ;)
Oh, and I think 3 different sockets is cr@ppy.......no matter how the Intel PR tries to spin it.