Intel's First Nehalem Cpu-Z Pic.

Printable View

Show 100 post(s) from this thread on one page

02-02-2008, 05:18 PM
kiwi

Lol since when cpuz says core VID? :p:
02-02-2008, 05:21 PM
Spawne32

Quote:

Originally Posted by kiwi

Lol since when cpuz says core VID? :p:

Windows 7 version :rofl: :rofl: :rofl:
02-02-2008, 05:24 PM
Gautam

Try CPU-Z 1.43...
02-02-2008, 05:25 PM
grimREEFER

windows xp lol?
i think its fake.
02-02-2008, 05:26 PM
Warboy

Quote:

Originally Posted by Spawne32

Windows 7 version :rofl: :rofl: :rofl:

I hate so much its not even funny.

*OnTopic*

But the lvl2 cache seems too small to believe
02-02-2008, 05:29 PM
Shintai

Quote:

Originally Posted by Shadowmage

Why do you always pretend you know everything?

It's pretty obvious to anyone who actually does that you do not.

You are often helpful for those who don't know anything, but please keep in mind that just because you read some speculation off the internet, doesn't mean it's actually true.

Nehalem comes in two flavors: one uses the old FSB, and one uses QuickPath (CSI). This one seems to be the one using the old FSB.

LOL, this seems to bother you alot.

No, Bloomsfield dont use an FSB. It uses a DMI/CSI link to a northbridge that handles PCIe. No nehalem CPUs got FSB, its dead. The only difference is 2 versions uses onboard PCIe and the other version dont.

Do you know everything? You seem to correct me so are you any better? :p:

2GB memory, the green grid boxes is not the same size in memory and cpus. Plus a hellajua of other things that just dont add up.
02-02-2008, 05:38 PM
mak1skav

Graps popcorn and wait for more infos.
02-02-2008, 05:44 PM
adamsleath

i heard rumour of a socket H LGA715 that is supposedly ddr2 compatible and has no CSI...though i think it's unlikely.

http://www.beyond3d.com/content/news/540

anyway there must be some nehalem prototypes or somesuch floating around by now; if only internal to intel dudes :confused:

particularly if Bloomfield is on track for H2/Q4 08 release
:slobber:
what time interval between yorkfields and first nehalems? 6 months?, 9+?:)
02-02-2008, 05:44 PM
Tony

And how do you guys all know CPU-Z is coded right to detect the CPU correctly.

it makes me laugh how much you guys depend on applications that may not have the correct code yet. I still have a mobile prescott that shows its running 6GHZ on air ;) LOL
02-02-2008, 05:46 PM
ChaosMinionX

Quote:

Originally Posted by Shintai

100euro on its fake...

There would be no FSB, No L3 etc. And I dont think CPU-z even got the Nehalem word...but could be wrong.

L1 would also be 2x32KB or more.

And i´m sure a 2 socket Nelahem system would have more than 2GB memory...

Also why are these screenshots always in so poor quality...to hide the photoshop marks? :p:

Nehalem has an IMC version, and one thats still going to use a NB as far as I have read.
02-02-2008, 05:50 PM
Movieman

Quote:

Originally Posted by Tony

And how do you guys all know CPU-Z is coded right to detect the CPU correctly.

it makes me laugh how much you guys depend on applications that may not have the correct code yet. I still have a mobile prescott that shows its running 6GHZ on air ;) LOL

Thank you:up:
CPU-Z just up till 1.4.3 showedmy clovers as having 3.34v to the cpu's and that chips been out more than a year.
02-02-2008, 05:51 PM
M.Beier

Quote:

Originally Posted by ChaosMinionX

Nehalem has an IMC version, and one thats still going to use a NB as far as I have read.

I'd really like to read that...
Basicly my statement was based on the FSB mainly, as I dont see such on the upcoming CPUs?
Further L2 seems very wrong...

But IMC is the main thing that'll make nehalem awesome...
02-02-2008, 05:54 PM
Kunaak

I will not comment any further.
but from what I know.
this comes from a good source.
02-02-2008, 05:57 PM
ChaosMinionX

Quote:

Originally Posted by M.Beier

I'd really like to read that...
Basicly my statement was based on the FSB mainly, as I dont see such on the upcoming CPUs?
Further L2 seems very wrong...

But IMC is the main thing that'll make nehalem awesome...

http://www.beyond3d.com/content/news/540

There was another article as well done by Xbit, and I believe one on Anand... I will dig them up.
02-02-2008, 05:59 PM
EnJoY

Shintai, since no one else has claimed it, I'll take that 100 euros. ;)
02-02-2008, 05:59 PM
disruptfam

wasnt this chips sposed to be on a 32nm process?
02-02-2008, 06:02 PM
M.Beier

I've started reading on that URL :)

Quote:

Originally Posted by disruptfam

wasnt this chips sposed to be on a 32nm process?

no

EDIT:
Socket 1366: 3xDDR3, External PCI Express, 1-2xQuickPath (Optional 2S?), Q408.
Socket 1160: 2xDDR3, 16xPCI Express Gen2, DMI (to southbridge, slower than FSB), 1H09.
Hmm... 3x DDR3 2x DDR3... Now, are we talking interleave here or..? Im a bit confused already
02-02-2008, 06:12 PM
adamsleath

32nm is a 'future' shrink of nehalem (an Intel "tick")
and then a 32nm "tock" will bring new architecture - some bollox like that anyway....:hehe:

going by the marketing "tick tock" spiel
penryns are 45nm tick and first 45nm nehalems are the tock

which in my mind seems to indicate that a shrink is attempted without much mod to the basic architecture of the chip then a more significant arch change is introduced at the new fab/process level.

then they shrink it again...

http://www.xbitlabs.com/news/cpu/dis...Necessity.html
http://pc.watch.impress.co.jp/docs/2...igai411_03.pdf - this looks like integrated gpu (Havendale?) also shown to be LGA1160

http://forum.ragezone.com/f337/all-n...-equal-331251/
basically three new cpu platforms :eek::
Bloomfield core ->Tylersburg chipset with QPI and triple channel ddr3
Lynnfield core with Ibexpeak chipset "using Intel's ageing DMI chipset interconnect"
& Havendale core, also using Ibexpeak PCH - "platform controller hub"
02-02-2008, 06:22 PM
Spawne32

Quote:

Originally Posted by adamsleath

32nm is a 'future' shrink of nehalem (an Intel "tick")
and then a 32nm "tock" will bring new architecture - some bollox like that anyway....:hehe:

going by the marketing "tick tock" spiel
penryns are 45nm tick and first 45nm nehalems are the tock

which in my mind seems to indicate that a shrink is attempted without much mod to the basic architecture of the chip then a more significant arch change is introduced at the new fab/process level.

then they shrink it again...

but im also wondering whether the LGA1160 socket will be better than the 1366 socket design, and also whether 1160 will have triple channel ddr3 or if 1366 socket is the only one to have triple channel?

What happens when we are done with the nanometers?
02-02-2008, 06:23 PM
NapalmV5

if its indeed real.. why such a low fsb?
02-02-2008, 06:26 PM
EnJoY

Quote:

Originally Posted by NapalmV5

if its indeed real.. why such a low fsb?

Very early ES, and again...do you know that it's being reported correctly? :rolleyes:
02-02-2008, 06:30 PM
NapalmV5

Quote:

Originally Posted by EnJoY

Very early ES, and again...do you know that it's being reported correctly? :rolleyes:

goodness gracious if the damn thing reports everything incorrectly why the heck do we use it :rolleyes:

abolish it!
02-02-2008, 06:33 PM
Kingcarcas

Quote:

Originally Posted by Spawne32

What happens when we are done with the nanometers?

The internet collapses into a black hole.
02-02-2008, 06:42 PM
Spawne32

Quote:

Originally Posted by Kingcarcas

The internet collapses into a black hole.

:ROTF:
02-02-2008, 06:43 PM
EnJoY

Quote:

Originally Posted by NapalmV5

goodness gracious if the damn thing reports everything incorrectly why the heck do we use it :rolleyes:

abolish it!

If by everything you mean unreleased and virtually unobtainable engineering sample parts, then sure. :rolleyes:

Show 100 post(s) from this thread on one page